This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
He is in a position to make it care about his Jewish identity and protect it.
How on earth would your observation smooth my concerns rather than justify them? The only real controversial thing would be to say that these companies are going to put particular emphasis on consciously making sure the AI is aligned to Jewish interests in how it responds to prompts and generates creative output. Tapping Aaronson is the exact sort of thing that would follow from that conclusion.
How? Is it going to put on a virtual kippah and tallit and respond in a heavy Yiddish accent: "Oy vey, why you not supporting Israel?" if I ask it about dukkah?
It's going to be optimized for giving really good critiques of white identity, history, and culture and lock up when it comes to any sort of prompts that would invite criticism of Jewish identity and culture. It's going to be so good at doing this, it will oftentimes be imperceptible. This going to influence its creative output as well which is going to generate art, film, and advertisements.
It's the most pure, mathematical form of Kevin MacDonald's thesis in Culture of Critique.
Is giving really good critiques of whatever that term signifies really in line with "Jewish interests" in any putative interethnic zero-sum game? The way it seems to me, the status of the memetically menopausal middle American cultural hobo stew that "white" usually denotes is already so low that its legendary powers of attraction hardly function anymore, and everyone who has the slightest claim to something else has switched to holding on to it for dear life. This seems likely to result in the emergence of more functioning ethnic coalitions that would be actively opposed to "Jewish interests". In concrete terms, a Joseph Anthony Buttigieg II immigrating to the US nowadays may well issue children who would march against Israel with the Arab student union, not generic gay white guys.
Yes, it is. You in fact say "whatever that term signifies", implying doubt that there is such a thing as white people- no doubt when there is talk about black people you don't feign ignorance. You can split hairs and argue for "social construct", that's what Chat-GPT does (but not for Jews or black people, only for white people). Of course, if I had my way, then the term Aryan should be used in order to denote non-Jewish European-descended, but we can't use the term Aryan because, well you know... let's ask GPT about the existence of an Aryan people:
Oops- you can word the prompt to ellicit some sort of response but it's just denunciations of term. But it does a good job of explaining:
So it goes.
How did it get to that point, specifically? With our culture, right?
Edit: Of course, Chat-GPT knows that "Aryan" is verboten but "Indo-European" gives a more accurate response (despite the fact they are synonymous terms):
No, "black people" is exactly the same sort of weird concept. It makes some sense to denote a cultural group inside of the US ("African-Americans" and "Caucasian-Americans", if you want), but the people who feel loyalty to it always unilaterally want to increase its legitimacy by extending it to other groups that are nothing like them and not even like each other. "White identity, history and culture", as held by most of those who would actually use those terms, starts in or around 17th century America, as does "black identity, history and culture"; and Jews in my European countr(y/ies) seem clearly more aligned to me (in terms of culture, history, interests, probably even genetics) than the typical American White Nationalist.
No it isn't, at least according to Chat GPT. There's the answer to your question. You live in your own little world where you declare racial categories that people identify with to be not real- that's fine, but Chat GPT will identify one as real and emphasize that it should be treated with respect and cultural sensitivity, while the other racial category is questionable at best- its entire existence is doubtful it should be regarded with suspicion because of all its negative associations.
I suppose that would depend on your interests and concerns- that is true for a large portion of white people in the United States as well who take your position that there is no such thing as white people who would have any ethnic interests. There are plenty of Europeans who would be happy to see themselves become minorities in their own countries, and they would obviously not be aligned with American white nationalists. Your position isn't novel, it sounds like you've learned your lessons.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link