site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 10, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think you hit the nail on the head but not in so many words about the bud light controversy.

Bud light is, well, not a beer that any reasonable person would associate with the sort of people who get into woke stuff. The advertising campaign featuring a z-list celebrity weirdo in a dress(and lets be real, that’s what Dylan mulvaney is- even by MTF standards he’s pretty deeply odd and he’s pure culture war fodder because he’s so weird and annoying) wasn’t served to me(beer ads seem to think of me as a right wing Hispanic beer snob) but it did uniquely offend me because, well, who did they think it was going to appeal to? I mean gay pride cans in June are obviously for sale to gay bars but does any bud light drinker have much sympathy for trans? And I’m so enthusiastic about not drinking any Budweiser product(of which there are many, and of which some are drinkable) because this feels like my demographic(blue collar males) exercising cultural power. This is the one time we get to hit back, and it feels good. Honestly that last bit probably makes all the difference in the world.

Anyways I’ll be drinking shiner after yard work.

Damn it, after all my intentions to stay gone, this is what drags me back in?

Dylan Mulvaney is not MTF, and I'll tell you why: no tits. Look at any picture of him, and he's flat as a board. Real MTF transgender women can't wait to grow a pair of Real Girl Boobs (hence the jokes about "titty skittles"). (I'm also suspicious about the hair; in several photos it looks like a wig. Could be a wig, could be extensions, could be he grew his hair out. Also the crow's feet wrinkles. Those make him look older than 26 and are the kind of thing that could be fixed up by cosmetic surgery if he's really serious about being a girl). Allegedly he's had facial surgery, I don't know. His face is still very masculine and doesn't do him any favours in some pictures.

Mulvaney is a gay guy who did drag and has now managed to wangle a gimmick stunt of "my year as a girl" into being 'trans' and the face of some dumb campaign.

I believe the higher-ups at Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV when they say they had no idea about this. It does seem to be the brainchild of that marketing lady who wanted to lose the "fratty" image. Well congrats on that girl, I hope you have similar success in your next job because I have a feeling this campaign means you get handed your P45 (or whatever the American equivalent is).

Mulvaney isn't trans, he's a femme gay guy who will slip back to whatever acting/comedy/drag act he was doing once the trans craze dies down.

And that's it, this time I really am gone and staying gone.

And that's it, this time I really am gone and staying gone.

I enjoyed having you back around! Hopefully you don't stay gone forever. :)

Honestly he’s always struck me as a gay man in a dress more than a genuine MTF, but he’s clearly attempting to milk the MTF thing so that’s what I’m calling him.

Allegedly he's had facial surgery, I don't know. His face is still very masculine and doesn't do him any favours in some pictures.

I don't think Mulvaney comes anywhere close to passing, but when I look at that picture in particular, the face doesn't stand out to me as particularly masculine. Perhaps it's because it's an exaggerated facial expression that distorts the shape quite a bit, but if I didn't know who I was looking at, I could be convinced it's an older cis woman (though my 1st guess would be trans woman).