site banner
PaperclipPerfector  11mo ago (text post)   3847 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for May 14, 2023

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, if you're defining power so generally, why do you feel that as a project manager you get less power but just as much responsibility? Can you indicate the context for what you mean by that? What sort of responsibility are you referring to?

There's a difference between being the manager of a mission-critical project that directly reports to a C-level exec and the manager of a project that is one of many projects your company runs to categorize capital expenses better.

The former has a lot of power, because it's basically a "Head of X" position that you can transform into a real "Head of X" position when the project is over. He or she can yank the best people from existing teams to work on the project full time and doesn't have to worry about their compensation or covering their absence.

The latter doesn't even get his own personal fief like any line manager does. He or she has to go to existing teams and beg for estimates, resources, commitments and results. Any piddling team lead or section head can brush him or her off, "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that by Friday. We've been fixing a production incident and you know Barry knows the system better than anyone, that why he's been assigned to your project, but this incident means he's busy until next Tuesday. Oh, and the vendor we've sourced the driver from has raised its prices, so we'll need you to approve additional $15k. No, how can I negotiate with them? I'm not procurement. And you might want to take it up with Larry if you want Barry to work on your project instead of fixing production issues, Dave. I'm just following the priorities I've been given."

So poor Dave goes to Larry, who explains he's the fifth PM he's seen today. No, there are no resources. Look, here's the meeting minutes from March when the resources were assigned to projects. It's written right here under "Risks": overbooking likely if system stability doesn't improve. And guess what, Dave? We're overbooked. Yes, I can tell Harry to ask Barry to work overtime. Can you pay for it from your budget? Oh, it was the first line item that was slashed? Guess what, HR has slashed our overtime budget, too."

What do you mean? I'm using the standard definition of power.

the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behaviour of others or the course of events.

I'm just asking for specifics. Keep it specific to what power and responsibility a project manager would have or want. Or not want, and have forced upon them.

I'm not going to do that this deep in a thread no-one is going to read. I'm done.

What on earth? So you don't actually care about sharing your viewpoints with others? It's all just about trying to score some kind of points by getting people to read what you write? How bizarre. You seem very hostile for some reason.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats