This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Contra Greer, I like Asian-Americans, find that they are on average excellent American citizens and net contributors, and the extent to which their politics leans Democrat seems heavily driven by continued wignat sentiments. I don't actually think I need to "remember that identity will always remain paramount" to find common cause with Asian-Americans in battles against affirmative action or other racial spoils systems.
'Asian American' is far too broad a category. Indian-Americans and Chinese-Americans are about as different to each other as either is to European-Americans. In general on the 'new right' we see (and have long seen, see Dinesh D'Souza in the 1990s) quite a substantial number of South Asians (including even a few Pakistanis and Bengalis here and there), but very, very few East Asian Americans, who are more uniformly progressive.
This doesn't track with personal experience or with any polling I've ever seen. Indian Americans are the Asian American group that is usually most consistently supportive of Democrats (e.g. 2020 and 2012). It's possible that East Asian Americans are just less likely to engage deeply in politics overall, so your observations may just be a variance effect.
More options
Context Copy link
Too broad for what, exactly? We surely can drill down even further and note that Hmong-Americans aren't socioeconomically advantaged, or that Korean-Americans do tend towards more conservative affiliations (see Michelle Steel and Young Kim, see also the relationship of Korean immigrants to the LA riots), and I think that makes sense at times. I agree with the obvious statement that South Asians and East Asians aren't very similar. Nonetheless, my statement above seems true for the aggregated group that includes both South Asians and East Asians. Most importantly in the context of the Greer article, I reject the idea of my racial identity being highly salient when it comes to whether I should regard people of both South Asian and East Asian as both good Americans and potential allies across many political dimensions.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link