site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 21, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I had a similar experience when I was in grad school, I’m a white guy with middle/lower middle class parents. invariably the people whom were getting (I assume, i didn’t see their records) affirmative action benefits were overwhelmingly attractive women from more privileged backgrounds. It was one of the lived experiences which completely turned me off on the left and on academia more generally

This is what got me in law school. I was one of the poorest students in the class, had never met a lawyer until college, and really struggled to keep my head above water, but received essentially zero institutional support. Meanwhile I had to watch the privileged children of biglaw attorneys and Wall Street bankers get handed cushy paid internships, specialized career counseling, additional academic support, and special access to important alumni because of their "underprivileged" minority status. It's really hard to have positive feelings about social justice when you're watching your friends who are already richer, better educated, and better connected than you get literally tens of thousands of dollars worth of free shit because of the color of their skin, and then still have the audacity to ask for (and receive) extensions on their final exams because they were traumatized by some cop being an asshole a thousand miles away.

I've seen too many children of Yale graduates benefit from affirmative action to support affirmative action.

I’m curious. Why do you think they were getting AA, rather than benefiting from elite backgrounds?

I went to a not-terribly-selective school in the Midwest. There were two big contingents that suggested “privileged background”: Greek life and foreign exchange. You could see either wearing branded clothes, throwing around money, and generally not taking the school part as seriously. But I’d have a harder time picking out anyone I’d assume was getting AA.

Well, unless you count sports.

Because people who benefit from elite backgrounds generally have the benefits that make them deserve it.

When your parent is able to homeschool you and groom you into an elite, you generally end up with the skills to get where you need to without any direct support from them.

But I suppose my definition of elite is the genuine American Aristocracy rather than someone's dad owning a car dealership.

If you had to ballpark...how large a percentage of the American population is the aristocracy?

Depends on where you are, the truly idle rich in my area are probably the top 2 % , but they are clustered here so likely less than 1‰ globally.

So - as a rough ballpark estimate - around the top 0.1 percent in America? That makes sense. Doctor tier salary is doing very well, but you wouldn't call them straight-up aristocrats...maybe either jumped-up tradesmen or managers or very bushleague aristocrats, not the real deal. IMHO you're not rich until you've got $15 million in the bank (and so don't have to work unless you want to) and you're not rich rich 'till you're making five million a year.

I put it more at around 3 million invested so it throws out a good yearly salary in returns. Otherwise unburdened and you can do whatever you want without too much hardship, at least enough to get free housing from someone who matters.