This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Not it is incompatible, even when intelligence isn't equal between groups. You seem to be operating with a model of colonization that is hypothetical and not how it ends up applying in practice, and how it worked historically.
On net colonization was good. Your trying to make me own anything that was bad during the process which I do disagree with.
Most of the ex colonized world is doing better without colonization so no. Also, the benefits of colonizations relate to things that can be done without colonization, like the spread of institutions and technology. Funnilly enough, some places on net benefited from colonization and then also on net benefited from kicking the colonizers out which set up extractive institutions.
Things are quite different in a world which is already interconnected. At the end of the day you are proposing something much worse.
And Japanese imperialism and nazi and Soviet imperialism is part of the history of colonization.
Also colonization is incompatible with democracy for the colonized. You do own the bad things about colonization since you support it.
I do think there are certain areas of the world that are so badly governed and incompetent that they would benefit if they let competent foreigners run more things. But colonization includes in it quite more than that, and a framework of being dominated by a foreign empire which does tend to relate to abuses of the native population. That is different from eing self determinant but hiring competent foreigners to build things and run but still loyal to your nation state. Such arrangements are probably better off for various african countries than trying to make it so blacks run everything. What is happening with China building things there for example.
I don't think you disagree with the bad aspects of colonialism in the way you expressed yourself.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link