naraburns nihil supernum
1yr ago
(text post)
29876 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #1
This is a megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
Before genociding the whole Palestinian population, Israel must first genocide one-half of it.
Before genociding one-half of the whole Palestination, Israel must first genocide one-half of it.
Before genociding onaf of the onaf wholstination, Is'rl must first genocide one-half of it.
...
Therefore genocide [of the Palestinian population] is impossible.
If Israel were to physically remove say all of a given members of a certain generation of the Palestination, say the 50+ years olds,
but that population, was, over the next or 5 next years, replenished by virtue of the previous generation aging into it,
and so on and so forth for every generation, would it still be the same Palestination?
Genocide is the destruction of a group. The cide of a genos. Obviously killing 1 person, however motivated, isn't genocide. Obviously killing every single person in that group is genocide. Where you draw the lines in the middle is the question, I don't see what your little word games have to do with it.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Before genociding the whole Palestinian population, Israel must first genocide one-half of it.
Before genociding one-half of the whole Palestination, Israel must first genocide one-half of it.
Before genociding onaf of the onaf wholstination, Is'rl must first genocide one-half of it. ...
Therefore genocide [of the Palestinian population] is impossible.
If Israel were to physically remove say all of a given members of a certain generation of the Palestination, say the 50+ years olds, but that population, was, over the next or 5 next years, replenished by virtue of the previous generation aging into it, and so on and so forth for every generation, would it still be the same Palestination?
I'm really not understanding your point.
Genocide is the destruction of a group. The cide of a genos. Obviously killing 1 person, however motivated, isn't genocide. Obviously killing every single person in that group is genocide. Where you draw the lines in the middle is the question, I don't see what your little word games have to do with it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link