This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'd say that I entirely sympathise with these concerns, even as a non-white immigrant to a Western country myself. It's not even about "a country that's not yours", at this point. There are more pressing considerations at hand.
Let's go best case scenario. Even if these immigrants do end up integrating into Western society and adopting their values - I'd say that's definitely still something one should be worried about. Western culture itself seems absolutely intent on stirring up racial animosity between the groups, as well as creating and maintaining a threat narrative that paints whites as being deserving of contempt regardless of whether they actually did anything or not.
The current culture in the west is one of blame, shame and hatred towards whites (just as it is towards every other group that wokes target). They are described as creating a system that oppresses all other groups to their benefit, and they are maligned as being complicit in this oppression by simply existing as a white person and thus unjustly benefiting from the system. They are falsely thought of as being uniquely monstrous in historical terms, uniquely capable of inflicting harm, and uniquely deserving of retribution enacted against them.
The news cycle and the entertainment that gets produced regularly stirs up animosity towards whites, and celebrates open demonstrations of dehumanisation and hatred towards them as merely being righteous anti-racism. Even incitements to violence against whites as a group are tolerated in a way it isn't against non-whites. Meanwhile, anything an individual white person does to an individual non-white is always assumed first and foremost to be motivated by racism, is always assumed not to be the bad act of an individual but the product of a society that is built by whites for whites (so the blame can be extrapolated to all whites), and is bandied around in the news cycle for days and days in order to stir up maximal outrage.
This is the type of rhetoric that often precedes racially-based violence against the target group. You can see the type of havoc that resulted after the massive George Floyd story, and that's with whites as a majority. What happens if they are no longer one?
There might be a way that different races can live together in harmony, but looking at the social environment right now, I don't think that outcome will come to pass. I know I'm not going to take advantage of these racial narratives, and I think doing so is morally reprehensible, but looking at the attitudes of many non-white people in Western countries (yes, even those Westernised ones), I can't say I have very much faith that most of them won't be super tribal.
At this point, if any significant subgroup of whites developed a strong "racial consciousness" for themselves and started pushing back against this crap with their own rhetoric on any large scale, I don't know if I would be able to blame them.
Regarding if I know this feeling: I feel a huge amount of dread, particularly surrounding relations between the sexes (feminists might be even more tremendously dishonest than critical race theorists, and that's saying something), but this also extends to racial relations and every other issue that wokes touch. Little of what they do seems to be conducive to a healthy, functioning society, instead it seems designed to absolutely stamp any semblance of social cohesion and unity into the ground in the name of some abstract, poorly-defined, constantly-shifting liberationist goal. I have no doubt that they think they're doing good things. They're just wrong about that.
Another point here is that even if the ideal version of integrating into Western society works out instead of the one where the different ethnic groups are living in strife, that still leaves such a society on the very same long term path OP is complaining about, unless a lot of other things radically change as well. Migrants who are productive, who attain academic degrees, who don't make constant tribalistic or ethnocentric comments have birthrates very similar to the ones of Western white majorities. The problem of demographic replacement applies to "good" minorities just as well as to whites!
I brought it up on the old place a while ago and it's an illustrative example: probably the most famous and accomplished migrants (of Turkish heritage at least) here in Germany, BioNTech (known through the Pfizer vaccine) founders and married couple Uğur Şahin and Özlem Türeci, have just one child, despite their fabulous wealth. Meanwhile, the Arab crime families of major German cities like the Abou-Chacker- or Remmo-clan are expanding demographically at a fast pace.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link