This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You definitely can. I'm married to someone with fairly different political views from mine (I'm libertarian by nature although somewhat moderate, she is fairly standard liberal beliefs). We've been married for 5 years now and it hasn't been a stumbling block for us. I think we have two things that have helped that to be the case.
First, we respect each other. Even when we disagree, we never make it personal. We don't call each other names or anything, and we each bear in mind that the other is coming from a place of good intentions even if we don't agree on the object-level discussion. Some people can get pretty nasty about political disagreements, and you really can't have that in a relationship IMO.
Second, neither of us is the sort of person whose mission in life is to convert others, so we don't actually talk about politics all that often. And when we do, we are able to end the discussion and agree to disagree. Sometimes we just aren't going to agree on the topic and that's OK with both of us. And that extends to our families as well: I keep my mouth shut when her family talks about how great Biden is, and she keeps her mouth shut when my dad talks about how great Trump is.
If people can pull off those two things, I think they can date each other regardless of personal beliefs.
More options
Context Copy link