This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The small bench thing may be true. But then why does the GOP have a deep bench of Presidential candidates?
GOP doesn’t lack big fundraising guys. They have Ken Griffen/Elon Musks who are as high end as you can get.
This was dealt with before where the GOP has a plan to deal with not having foot soldiers to run a Presidency.
Someone here posted plan 2025. I applied to that. I got no problem being a good foot soldier in Washington because I think it’s a cause worth doing.
The GOP has a deep bench precisely because the quality of candidates is so poor that random businessmen, grifters and various elected congressmen, governors and so on always think it’s their year.
The Dems have a mostly shitty slate (Buttigieg isn’t winning a presidential) but they can almost always dig up someone capable of winning. Once it was Obama, in a few years it’ll be Gavin Newsom. And Newsom isn’t smart, but he’s very handsome and looks like the President from a Hollywood movie, so he’ll win. Do the GOP have one hot man capable of winning a presidential election?
Thinking about this the argument doesn’t make sense.
The GOP had a deep bench because they suck? That sounds like your argument. So random high achieving people think they can win in the GOP. The Democrats have bad candidates because no one proper thinks they can win office with them so the good/smart people don’t run and we get Fettermans?
More options
Context Copy link
The left doesn’t even have a bench at all. We can play the game where you criticize every gop candidates flaws but the Dems bench is Newsome? Who got recalled as governor? Kamela Harris who polls awful.
I do care about credentials for politicians. Desantis as much as people will hate on him is very solidly credentialed. He went to the right schools. I kind of do believe POTUS should have went to an Ivy. The Dems despite dominating those institutions can’t seem to find Ivy candidates.
More options
Context Copy link
Desantis. Haley. Dems nominated Biden because they have no one. GOP nominates Trump because there’s a big bunch who really like him
There's no cross-party appeal, though, the way there was in 2016. Trump has a base who loves him and had the incumbent advantage in 2020, but still lost to a milquetoast whose strongest asset was how uninspiring he was. The whole MAGA brand is fucked, and their incessant culture warring and inability to focus on issues that actually matter have alienated them from a broad swath of the American electorate that's necessary for them to maintain power.
Look at the PA Senate race. I'm a Democrat but I voted for Toomey and wouldn't have been averse to voting for a Toomey-like Republican, especially since Fetterman was such a lousy candidate for reasons totally unrelated to his health. But first they back Sean Parnell, a guy so slimy he was forced to drop out before the primary. Then they go to two carpetbaggers and nominate one whose only selling points are already being a celebrity and having a Trump endorsement. Here and in so many other places, they seem intent on snatching defeat from the jaws of victory because they insist on running campaigns based on MAGA nonsense. Deep bench indeed.
More options
Context Copy link
Desantis does not look good. Here is him vs Newsom
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link