site banner
PaperclipPerfector  6mo ago (text post)   27554 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 27, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Bottom New Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a bit funny to read this at the same time we're seeing a swing towards right wing curmudgeons in various countries like Argentina, Chile, the Netherlands, and possibly even Sweden and Ireland now.

The OP didn't deny that the right could have success in elections.

a swing towards right wing curmudgeons

There was a lengthy comment by a guest in one of Neema Parvini's recent videos relevant to this point (at about 1:23:00); let me see if I can transcribe it:

The time scale isn’t to do with presidencies, and people think in time horizons that are far too narrow. Policy is not decided every four years. Policy is not made up every four years. There is permanent continuation policy of the American government and the American Empire that has taken place since 1945; and that much is very, very evident.

The people saying leaders matter — Trump was never the leader of America. Trump was never in power. That is the lesson you should take away from this. He didn’t know how many troops were in Syria; they simply lied to him and waited until he left office. Donald Trump was not in power because the levers of power lead nowhere; and emotionally attaching to who is in the presidency is part of the problem that we have, in that most Western policy in most places is on rails. I do not believe that the last ten years of the Tory government in Britain, to answer AA’s question, would have been particularly different under a Labour government. The Equality Act is something that was dreamt up by Labour and brought by the Tories.

People talk about the Uniparty. It’s really a basic bitch Libertarian talking point, but they’re right. There really is no difference in terms of macro-policy, in terms of a decades-long time scale, whether you have a blue government or red government, because nations are not ruled by elected officials. Democracy does not function. Nations are ruled by the permanent bureaucracy, which does not change.

And to bring my final point into this, a political victory, and a real transfer of power is what took place in Ukraine in 2014, with a process known as “lustration,” where they banned every government official — including judges — from being part of the government for five to ten years. That is what it looks like when an American-directed vassal actually wants to change who is in office.

Who is in office does not change in Western democracies, and that is a fundamental misunderstanding of this point. We shouldn’t celebrate this, and we shouldn’t have an emotional stake in it, because who is in power is not changing. It is not changing in the Netherlands, it is not changing in Argentina, and it has not changed in Italy. Who is in power has not changed, and I think that is really why talking about the posters put over the permanent regimes and bureaucracies — which largely are vassals of global American power, let’s be fair — is relatively meaningless. It’s impossible to say whether you were better off or worse off under certain regimes, because the regime does. Not. Change.

Yes, as has happened various times since 1789, but never for long.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats