This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is probably accurate. Hanania's formulation was something like this:
"Jews have +1 standard deviation IQ and also +1 standard deviation in caring about politics". Therefore, among individuals who are +3 standard deviations in each category, Jews comprise an absolute majority.
His +1 in caring about politics is the squishy piece here. He's grasping for something. There's clearly something going on beyond just IQ. Perhaps we could explain it with clannishness or, framed more positively, "working together".
High IQ isn't enough to explain Jewish dominance of industries like Hollywood (or smaller ones like diamonds). An extreme in group bias is also necessary. This would probably also explain other market dominant minorities such as the Chinese in Malaysia.
I think Hanania's characterization there (the +1 in caring) is definitely pointing at a thing that exists, but I'd phrase it more like "argues about ideas." There has been a longstanding trend in Jewish communities to engage in an especially lively debate about abstractions, and this has been handed down through the generations by (IMO) mutually-reinforcing genetics and culture. Politics is all about picking which ideas get resources, so this is one context where a tendency to ideological combativeness is a natural fit. (This argument extends to the scientific method and Anglo-American jurisprudence, both of which are formed around the core concept of ideas and advocacy in conflict. Jews have also tended to do particularly well in those areas.)
More options
Context Copy link
“Asabiyyah” works well here.
More options
Context Copy link
Higher IQ at the far right tail also exacerbates even ‘normal’ levels of in-group nepotism (such as nepotism within families) since the people doing the nepotism are disproportionately successful and the nepo hires are more likely to succeed in the role than the average nepo hire from a less able population.
Reversion to the mean means that 2 150IQ Jews are much more likely to have a 150IQ child than 2 150IQ gentile whites.
Nepotism entropy is therefore reduced.
It makes sense. Jews hire a Jewish doctor because he's likely to be better. And Christians hire a Jewish doctor for the same reason. (Or would, if they knew any).
There's also another factor. Hollywood and diamonds are industries in which trust is paramount, so would naturally tend to be dominated by a close-knit group.
There’s a bit in Curb where Larry David gets displeased with his Swedish-American lawyer for misleading others into thinking he was Jewish, like a form of stolen valor.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link