site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 1, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it only impacts some people and not others, if poor parenting quality is at best one factor that might or might not lead to an outcome that can be arrived at without poor parenting quality, then we have to question whether parenting quality is really important at all, n'est pas?

No, it impacts some people in ways you can see and not others. There's a pretty big difference.

I mean, yes, most people with fucked up childhoods had fucked up childhoods because their parents needed anger management class/alcoholics anonymous/whatever. Ordinary middle class people need to chill out about thinking they're going to traumatize their kid. But it's not all the child's genes. It's not hard to find people who were traumatized by step-dads or whatever after normal and well adjusted dad got rammed by a drunk driver, and who are really affected by this.

No, it impacts some people in ways you can see and not others. There's a pretty big difference.

Could you clarify this? Because it sounds very much like saying that the position is right but unprovable, that parenting is important but leaves no tangible and measurable evidence of its importance. But I'm sure that's not your point.

It's not hard to find people who were traumatized by step-dads or whatever after normal and well adjusted dad got rammed by a drunk driver, and who are really affected by this.

It's also not hard to find people whose I Coulda Been a Contenda speech involves truly absurd turns of chance, or people who live similarly negative lives for no discernible reason at all. It's not hard to find people traumatized by birth dad. It's not hard whose birth dad was a very nice guy, a devout guy at 7am mass every morning, who still wound up all fucked up and addicted messes. Kids' sexual ethics are one of the classic realms of parental obsession; I can name as many liberals' kids who turned into prudes as I can examples of the proverbial Catholic schoolgirl gone wild.

Anecdote isn't data, and where there is so much noise in all the actual results, it seems like we should step back on the importance of parenting overall, beyond the basics that we can really point to positives on, and virtue-ethics points that don't rely on their effectiveness to justify themselves. Feed your kids nutritious food, get them a basic education, encourage their interests, supervise them enough to make sure they don't kill themselves, take them to Church long enough for them to pick up a basic sense of religion, teach them a work ethic, then hope they pick up the baton and keep running.