site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 4 of 4 results for

domain:astralcodexten.com

This made me reflect that I hadn't actually thought critically about the phrase (at least, commensurate to how often it's used). For fun, if you think the purpose of a system is what it does, write what you think that means, before reading Scott's critique, then write if you've updated your opinion. For example: I think it's a useful way of re-framing obviously dysfunctional systems, so as to analyze their dysfunction, but Scott is persuasive that it's not a good means of understanding systems, in general, so people should be more cautious about adopting this framing and using the phrase, rhetorically.

(Spoilers go between two sets of "||")

I think this was one of the best posts to come from Scott since his switch to ACX. I think he lays out the situation clearly and fairly, and makes a good case for why priesthoods have unique pitfalls, but are still better than not having them. I think his hypothesis about why wokeness infiltrated every priesthood is interesting, but only one of many many potential angles to be considered. I want to hear what the Motte has to say about all of this.