netstack
The horse embodies the wings a person feels inside.
No bio...
User ID: 647
I think you’ll get better results on the Wellness Wednesday thread, friend.
Not really. I got most of my feeling awful out of the way in the first few days, when we were bragging about lethality vs. schoolgirls. Now I just feel numb and annoyed.
Maybe if the economy implodes, I’ll have a better chance at finding a house.
How do you mean?
Tactical shooters are built around a tension/release loop between the positioning and the shooting. You are running your own strategy with imperfect information about how to preempt the enemy. Collecting more information narrows the possibility space, until one of you gets the payoff in the form of a head appearing under your crosshair.
One extreme form is the extraction shooter, where 95% of the gameplay is routine. Covert maneuvering, inventory management, situational awareness. The whole time, though, you're supposed to be predicting what the other players are up to while you're preoccupied. Then you get a payoff in the form of climactic fights or narrow escapes. I'm sure @self_made_human has said more on the subject.
MOBAs occupy a different space, but they've still got tension/release. The routine activity (farming) gives way to deliberate maneuvers (ganks, pushes) give way to a big payoff (teamfights). You get some control over the transitions between steps if you correctly assess relative strengths, player intents, and so on.
All this without mentioning the social aspect. Monkey brain shows dominance. Monkey brain impress friends. Graah.
The ones which can be, are. It's all well and good until people disagree on which outcomes qualify as "ideal." Casinos are an excellent example.
Maybe I confused the issue.
I wanted to say that unfairness in the setting doesn’t imply unfairness in the society. It’s unfair and unsettling that humans have to share a universe with superior artificial intelligences, but they’ve managed to construct a utopian society in spite of it.
If the Culture were the only game in town, I would be more inclined to call it dystopian. But leaving/schisming/self-effacing is a large part of their appeal. I think that forgives a lot of the paternalism.
No?
Have you ever seen anyone, of any race or class, say “I guess I’m low human capital, time to get on the dole”? Okay, maybe angsty channers. But it’s really not the normal mindset.
Also, this would predict that poor Appalachian whites should vote Dem, which does not appear to have been true for some time.
Sarcasm is unbecoming. Speak plainly.
Does it import anything other than calling its ranks “belts”?
I certainly didn’t spend the money to get inducted into its higher mysteries.
And why do you think that is?
If I caught myself describing romance like this I’d go ahead and remove myself from the gene pool.
But not a particularly Christian one.
- That doesn’t say anything about Earthly forgiveness.
- No, it isn’t. Any mapping of modern progressive idpol to Christianity proves way too much. You might as well say that Lean Six Sigma is a secular mirror. Or multi-level marketing. Or the normal criminal justice system.
Man, that might be even more vague than the original framing.
How exactly was it worse? Did the moron ever have a chance of getting line of sight on the President?
Are all our institutions so rotten?
I don’t understand what institutions you think are analogous to the Secret Service.
I just finished Matter the other day.
The Culture is utopian, even though it’s built on two great injustices.
You can’t compete with the Minds. This is a fact of the setting, rather than a societal choice or a zero-sum game, so it doesn’t move the needle into dystopia.
You also can’t manufacture meaning, even from unlimited material wealth. As a consequence, the Culture chooses to mine it from weaker civilizations. Half the books interrogate the morality and practicality of doing so; the other half elaborate on what kind of mythology lets a society justify it. But at no point does this abuse fall upon the citizens. It is an externality.
No downsides for the citizens, no dystopia.
Put me in the same boat as @EverythingIsFine, I guess. John Hinckley Jr. jokes aren’t really what I’d call “celebration.”
Contrast the examples from Scott’s classic:
Then a few years later, Margaret Thatcher died. And on my Facebook wall – made of these same “intelligent, reasoned, and thoughtful” people – the most common response was to quote some portion of the song “Ding Dong, The Witch Is Dead”. Another popular response was to link the videos of British people spontaneously throwing parties in the street, with comments like “I wish I was there so I could join in”. From this exact same group of people, not a single expression of disgust or a “c’mon, guys, we’re all human beings here.”
The bar for telling tasteless, gloating jokes on social media is unbelievably low. Users do it constantly for figures who are much less hated and much less likely to be attacked than the President. Then they’re signal-boosted, because social media sites are for fun and drama, and most people don’t want to read about sober disavowals of antisocial behavior. They can get that in person.
Sorry, that was flippant of me.
What you’re saying fits my intuition better than WC’s load-bearing model.
Great. Now I’m half expecting a Republican crackdown against Fortnite.
Well, that’s the first time I’ve seen such a theory. I would have said there’s been more support for Trump et. al in the wake of the killing. People like @JeSuisCharlie joining up to talk about how he was the last beacon of hope or whatever.
How could you distinguish “political murders work” from Republicans losing on fundamentals? Say, if they did a bunch of highly-visible police actions and then started a war in the Middle East?
I’d take that bet even if I hadn’t read his alleged manifesto.
The probability of targeting the Big Guy but starting shooting earlier is higher than the probability of targeting someone else but deciding to go after him at one of the most secure events of the year.
Yeah, I'm gonna tap the sign.
Let's imagine for a second that someone does not agree with you. What the fuck are they supposed to say? "Nuh uh"? At least when people cite crime statistics, they can have an actual argument over whether they're real, representative, whatever. What you've got here is made-up numbers and venting.
Unfortunately, the blocks page is in chronological order. And also might not be generally visible. You might be able to extract the data, though.
There’s no way. Testosterone is a helluva drug.
The BJS has this survey, which shows ~2x rates for various crimes, but doesn’t separate lesbian from gay. It’s still a weird result. There’s definitely a higher reporting rate, but I’m not sure what causes that, either. More trust in the police? An urban bias?
If you download the NCVS stats yourself or otherwise figure out how to filter it, let me know!
- Prev
- Next

Finished Gideon the Ninth. Such a fun book.
Made a trip to half-price books for an excellent haul. Various Vlad Taltos novels, the first five Amber Chronicles, the next Aubrey/Maturin, and. Uh. Gulag Archipelago. There’s got to be something good in that pile!
More options
Context Copy link