netstack
Texas is freedom land
No bio...
User ID: 647
Chemical rockets do a lot better in the worst case scenario for a rocket launch.
I agree that they’re too weak for the real extrasolar timelines.
If there was a bunch of fissile material sitting around in the asteroid belt, maybe that would be a good reason to get up there. Unfortunately, a cursory search tells me that it only got concentrated on Earth by some sort of geological distillation. Probably not available outside of gravity wells.
I mean, you can watch the same guy wishing for this deal turn around and accuse Jews of running their own blood libel. I could see how that would be a deal-breaker.
The obvious hypothesis would be that Jews are not, in fact, a hivemind capable of making deals collectively.
Israel can do what it wants, but it actually doesn’t control the ADL or random donors. And the Republican Party has spent long enough pissing those individuals off that it can’t expect a sudden reversal.
I suppose I also think it’s wrong to describe “the left” as a monolith for similar reasons.
I do not get the impression that most Trump supporters care if he is lying.
That said, I would also expect his administration to close ranks in whatever way helps him save face. Perhaps there will be a Tweet explaining our foreign policy.
You mean a monk?
The word “trove” always makes me think of pirates. Did they find these using ground-penetrating radar, too?
Joking aside, I seem to recall you consistently going to bat for Russia. I have a hard time imagining you criticizing them for their tactics. Perhaps there’s some other group where you’d apply this standard? Do you subscribe to the case for reparations?
Lots of countries have hit below their weight for centuries.
A cursory glance suggests that Iran did pretty well for itself…until it had to compete with Tsarist Russia.
South Africa was a strange, strange case. The collapse of apartheid meant that the former government was suddenly very motivated to remove its nuclear capabilities. Not sure those circumstances are present in Iran. Good video about it here.
That said, I agree that nuclear (or WMD) inspection is at least theoretically possible. The industrial capacity isn’t as dual-purpose as something like a chemical plant, right?
Almost as good as The Count of Monte Carlo.
Whoops.
I was going to say something along the lines of: “soft power” arguments traditionally don’t score many points with neocons or knee-jerk nationalists. Trying to rehabilitate Syria as a success of the RBIO feels like it’s missing the point.
Thanks, Obama?
In all seriousness, equating economic sanctions with hard power is more
Where'd you see anything about cutting off service?
As far as I can tell, Anthropic refused to do extra work beyond the scope of its contracts to implement those two things. The government is the one that decided to alter the deal.
I don't think that's a very good analogy.
This is more like the guys who built a nuclear powerplant. Then the government comes and says "can you remove some of those failsafes? we want to reserve the option to cause a catastrophic meltdown." Are the nuclear engineers obligated to do extra work to take off existing guardrails?
Actually, I think there are better analogies. Let's say a company makes cell phones, some of which are sold to the government. Then a party official comes in to demand that all government cell phones contain some plastic explosive. For legal purposes only, of course.
I think the company would be entirely within its rights to decline. Then the government could, also reasonably, terminate its contracts and go find someone who will agree. The market in action.What it shouldn't do, in my opinion, is destroy the entire company for not bending over backwards. That's cutting off your nose to spite your face. It's command-economy bullshit.
Actually, that kind of is what happened to Oppenheimer. He stepped on enough toes at the Commission to get investigated for disloyalty. His security clearance was stripped, and the U.S. lost a skilled and loyal scientist. Great deal, huh?
I should have been more clear. I was a little drunk and drafting a letter to my representative at the time. Great combination.
I think that this is the stupidest sort of gunboat diplomacy. It's a terrible deal for Anthropic, of course, but it's also shit for the government, for other AI companies, and for the broader U.S. technical advantage. Blowing up one of your best companies because they complied, but not enough, is dumb. Blowing up the only one who was already integrated into your operations is even stupider. China is laughing all the way to the bank.
It's not a good week to be working at Anthropic, huh?
It’s iconic, but I can no longer hear the line as anything other tha
Uncle Sam, put your hand
Down the backofmy pants…
No; what gave you that impression?
I figured it was something like this explanation. But I’ve been blissfully ignorant of this particular Main Character of Twitter.
it would be very symbolic
How do you mean? I find it hard to see the parallels between invading Ukraine and bombing Iran, other than both being terrible ideas. Russia’s invasion is of no particular historical significance to either US or Iran.
It is fascinating to see how something that was absolute NO in traditional rules of war "Generals do not take pot shots at each other" became normalized in the rules based order.
I doubt that Yamamoto or Nelson saw it that way. Decapitation strikes were historically limited more by capability than by “traditional rules.”
The rest of your links feel more like shotgun-spread booing. Wow, those outgroup members sure are icky today!
I’d say a combination of 1, 3 and 4. Social media does make otherwise-invisible relationships a matter of public record. Conversely, the plural of “tweet” is not “data”, and the existence of a story is itself invisible until it hits some critical mass.
Then again, I hate and resent this topic for a different reason, so maybe I’m just extrapolating.
Guards is great. Men at Arms is even stronger, IMO. Unlike some of the other sub-series, they transition pretty smoothly into more complex novels as the cast matures, so basically all of them are worth reading.
I’m personally fond of the Moist von Lipwig novels, where a con man is placed in charge of the postal service and then the central bank. But it’s been a long time.
Well, I finished A Canticle for Liebowitz. I was not expecting the mutant murder wasteland sections to be the least bleak parts.
I am very glad that we don’t live under the same pall of nuclear holocaust.
Shit, I’d say I’m unusually interested in linguistics, and I don’t think I understand formal grammar.
willing to notice what she actually wants
Our culture is so fixated on individualism that the contrarian pseudoreactionaries are reinventing women’s lib. Respect.
- Prev
- Next

If only he had a company dedicated to underground mining operations…
More options
Context Copy link