@DradisPing's banner p

DradisPing


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 10 11:08:46 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 1102

DradisPing


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 10 11:08:46 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1102

Verified Email

Jewish students at UCLA had to go to court because protesters were blocking Jews from entering the campus and UCLA argued it had no responsibility to stop them from doing so.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/14/us/ucla-campus-protests-court-ruling/index.html

There has been a lot of targeting of Jews for being Jewish by protesters over the last few years.

The problem with ransom attacks is that they require the victims to do an individual rational cost benefit analysis and pay.

Most of these companies would refuse to pay out of moral indignation, which collectively gives them a herd immunity.

There are also types of insurance to cover some of the losses from business interruption.

The obvious answer is "Elon Musk." Certainly everyone seems to assume he's in charge of DOGE. He (and Trump) talk like Musk is in charge of the effort.

I think Musk's role is akin to the tank role in video games. He's drawing aggro and absorbing damage. He's basically taken over Trump's shitposting duties.

The contrast to Jack Smith is interesting, because that was a very clear violation of the appointments clause. Smith was signing court documents as a prosecutor without being confirmed as a prosecutor.

Whereas I doubt anything Elon has announced on Twitter is actually backed up by documents signed by Elon in official capacity.

John Eastman goes into the the types of jurisdiction and birthright citizenship in this interview: https://rumble.com/v6me54x-sidebar-with-john-eastman-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-lawfare-an.html?start=936

Unfortunately there's no transcript I'm aware of.

The key point here is that this is in SDNY. SDNY likes to pretend that it's not a normal district, instead it's a second DOJ.

The prosecutors are resigning in large part to promote that myth.

Of course that's not true. SDNY has no special legal status over say the Northern District of Alabama.

Barnes specifically has long been critical of the Federalist Society. Culturally it skews more pro corporate and more authoritarian than most of the right wing base would like.

It is not working yet! Judges have blocked almost all of his big cuts. Because they aren't legal by established law and precedent (Impoundment Control Act).

NGOs have run to DC and SDNY to get blocks because those are the most politically corrupt districts. The problem for them is that the TROs are so unprecedented and off the rails that higher courts are going to need to step in quickly.