@Evinceo's banner p

Evinceo

Resident Normie

1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 22:40:19 UTC

				

User ID: 224

Evinceo

Resident Normie

1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 22:40:19 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 224

I'd rather deny driving privileges to alcoholics if we're playing this game.

I'm not going to watch a 2 hour movie

Video is a poor medium, someone made a transcript.

NFTs are just a way for rich people to show that they're rich and have clout

They are that thing, but they're also a way to fleece people with pump and dump schemes.

rubbish at commodifying things

NFT jpegs are rubbish at commodifying things, but you could actually tie the ownership to something interesting. It would be massively annoying if that was done. for example check out what Pearson wants to do.

The move to digital helps diminish the secondary market, and technology like blockchain and NFTs allows us to participate in every sale of that particular item as it goes through its life

Any 'our side' that puts Kiwifarms on one side of the fence and NYT, WSJ, Fox, and let's say Newsmax on the other is questionable.

This should probably mention that LW/Rationalist-sphere folks are obsessed with intelligence, AI, and the idea that a superintelligent [sic] poses an existential risk to humanity.

I'm confused about the purpose of non -CW things pre-move. If something isn't CW-radioactive, why post it on TheMotte?

Of course now, I suppose we may develop a unique community that wants to discuss all matter of things.

It's very hard to follow megathreads without this.

I'm not a chess pro but if I'm playing chess or any other game against you and you're letting an ai pick your moves, I'd consider that cheating. Compare aimbotting.

If that was the case, Russia would have quit while she was ahead months ago.

Every Stoner comedy?

Saying that political elites are trying to enact a great replacement via high healthcare costs to disincentivize raising children is a bit of a leap.

Old World Monkeys and Apes masturbate so I think it's safe to assume that every version of our ancestors spanked the monkey.

Setting aside the impossibility of banning porn, let's say you somehow could. Your alternative doesn't feature men forced by the dearth of porn to visit a local prostitute... they just find something else to jerk off to, up to and including their own imagination, or memories of past sexual experiences. Porn isn't cutting into the prostitution industry's bottom line in any significant way, I would imagine, or the explosion of online porn would have put them out of business by now.

How does stripping feature into this dichotomy of yours anyway? It's in person, but it just encourages masturbation.

Overall I question your understanding of typical male sexuality.

we’re talking about psychological cleanliness involving cues

I'm interested in digging in a bit more on why you think this is important.

I'll chime in here that I'm one of the few libs to have stuck it out on TheMotte and, yeah, it does feel like it's taken a bit of an echoey turn with the site switch. I do think it's a mix of people finally being able to go mask off and rdrama folks trolling.

I don't think Joe Average Liberal will have the same experience I'm having, since I've spent most of my life enjoying back and forth with Cons and have my own weird ideosyncretic takes I like to ride around hobby-horse style.

I also don't have a great fix for this. Are there things libs want to say that they can't say on reddit? Abso-goddamn-lutely, but they're also things that left-wing spaces discourage saying as a taboo, so even unleashed in a place like this we hold our tongues.

Woke Activist isn't the opposite of Mottizen though, any more than Daily Mail Commenter is equal to Mottizen.

Let me indulge in a bit of repetition here: the right leaning things that will get you kicked off reddit won't get you in trouble with rightwing circles. The left leaning ideas that you aren't allowed to say on reddit you're also not really allowed to say anywhere lefty, so you're dealing with a lot of self-censorship.

You could have two separate CWR threads: one specifically about woke vs anti woke, and another for everything else.

Or just tell the hospital that they're unable to pay and sometimes the hospital will throw them a bone because the insurance company only agreed to such a high price to scare the uninsured and they know full well they can't squeeze blood from a stone.

A) Well, I'm here, aren't I?

B) Not every lefty is a Woke Activist but all lefties will be driven away if every post's unjustified base assumption is that there's a global woke conspiracy seeking to Harrison Burgeron the white people into submission.

Except it's not frowned on in right wing circles. Right wing circles meme about 2a and different sorts of boxes (ballot, ammo, etc) and 'what would happen if they tried to ban guns' constantly. Then they share tips for where you can get a CC licence. Lefty circles just smugly assume that righties are all talk, or cower in fear when it's clear that they aren't.

Basically any discussion of violence as a political tool, even just like 'yeah, we should probably have some number of liberal gun owners otherwise the Accelerationists will win because they think they're running unopposed.'

That was what I was coyly pointing out, but I'm sure there are other taboos, probably that I've become so good at avoiding I don't even notice.

You missed a juicy detail: the house was called Saxe-Coburg und Gotha which became extra awkward when the German Empire was running a bomber called a Gotha that was bombing london. So they made up Windsor.

But the vast majority of libs won't touch it with a ten foot poll.

Or openly admitting that you consider antivax folks so repugnant that you'd consider otherwise unfair measures to hassle them.

Isn't this an unjustified assumption? I mean, every post? I think the grey area here is how many posts are there actually like this? Or do you want to see these removed? If so, please see my echo chamber point above

Prediction, not assumption. It's not every post right now, but it's certainly trending upwards. I don't want to see them removed. It would be neat to fork then CWR thread into that vs everything else, but really I'd just settle for more... everything else posts.

Because the everything else posts are just plain more interesting! Look at the thread right now; healthy discussion on that NYT article, and much less on the NFL livery.

Maybe it's a losing battle-maybe I'm some sort of rare lib who doesn't screech. But I too have had lively debates over beer with people who I totally disagreed with and I think it's a good experience more people ought to have.