@Folamh3's banner p

Folamh3


				

				

				
5 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 13 13:37:36 UTC

https://firsttoilthenthegrave.substack.com/


				

User ID: 1175

Folamh3


				
				
				

				
5 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 13 13:37:36 UTC

					
				

				

				

				

				

					

User ID: 1175

My theory is that at any one time, there's one "primary" international news topic which dominates the Anglosphere discourse for months or years at a time. This topic is sometimes coupled with a "local" topic which only dominates the discourse in specific Anglosphere nations. In addition to the primary and local topic du jour, there are smaller secondary topics which take up a great number of column inches for a few weeks, but rarely longer than a fiscal quarter, and never threatening the status of the "primary" topic.

A history of international "current things" in Ireland:

  • Brexit (June-November 2016; intermittently recurs as a secondary topic whenever there's a lull in one of the subsequent primary topics)
  • Donald Trump election and presidency (November 2016-March 2020)
  • Covid (March 2020-December 2022)
  • George Floyd/BLM protests (May 2020-September 2020) [I'm cheating a little bit; while the protests were ongoing they seemed to take up exactly as much space in the discourse as Covid, then after they died down Covid returned as the sole current thing)
  • Russia-Ukraine war (February 2022-October 2023)
  • Israel-Gaza war (October 2023-present)

A history of "local" topics which dominated the Irish discourse almost as much as the dominant topic du jour, but only locally (with some maybe getting a few write-ups in British outlets:

  • Death of Savita Halappanavar (October 2012-January 2013) [as noted by @AvocadoPanic]
  • Murder of Elaine O'Hara (September-December 2013)
  • Introduction of water charges (mid 2013-mid 2014)
  • Cancellation of Garth Brooks concerts (July 2014)
  • Gay marriage referendum (January-May 2015)
  • Berkeley balcony collapse (June-July 2015)
  • Traveller mobile home fire (October-November 2015)
  • Abortion referendum (February-May 2018, having been a secondary topic for years prior)
  • CervicalCheck scandal (April-December 2018)
  • Murder of Ana Kriegel (May-July 2018)
  • Music Industry Stimulus Package (November 2020)
  • Killing of George Nkencho (December 2020-February 2021)
  • Murder of Aisling Murphy (January 2022)
  • Parnell Street stabbing and subsequent riots (November 2023-January 2024)

Valid point, although this theory has a lot of degrees of freedom. One might argue that it would predict that Churchill would get a pass from the anti-fascist collective, given that the thing he's most famous for is helping to defeat the most prominent example of fascism in human history.

Never.

Richard Hanania predicted exactly this in December. https://www.richardhanania.com/p/the-great-jewish-realignment-of-2023

What a triumph The Prestige is.

That and Memento are probably the only films of his I'd put in the W column without major qualifications.

The Axis powers were not the weaker party in WW2. They invaded and defeated various countries that were weaker than them.

It can simultaneously be true that Germany is stronger than Poland and that the USA is stronger than Germany.

I replied to you prior to your edit - I'm just about as aggressively anti-communist and anti-Soviet as they come.

Heck, if you look at ratios of civilian casualties -- as I've seen some argue makes Israel's actions unjustified -- America had almost none (generally counted as a few thousand if you include territories and civilian ship crews). The British claim 70,000. More civilians than that died in the Battle of Berlin alone, and Allied bombing campaigns killed hundreds of thousands. Not to mention the nuclear weapons.

A good article on this.

I have trouble embracing the progressive worldview on Gaza because those same principles, applied to WWII, would have me side with the Axis powers.

To quote myself:

Freddie deBoer confuses me on this point, because he was once writing about the Israel-Palestine conflict and stated “Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always stand on the side of the egg. Yes, no matter how right the wall may be and how wrong the egg.”

But he has also argued repeatedly that "punching up" and "punching down" is a meaningless framework through which to look at humour, interpersonal relationships or anything else.

If I'm reading this correctly, he means that in a conflict between a weaker party ("egg") and a stronger party ("high, solid wall"), he will always take the side of the weaker party, even if they're wrong and the stronger party is right. Which logically implies that, were Hamas ever to gain the upper hand, Freddie would immediately start supporting Israel. It likewise implies that he ought to have supported the Axis powers in the second world war.

Not original to me, to clarify.

Last of Us,God of War + GOW Ragnarok, Warcraft 3, Witcher 3, Sekiro

Can't comment, not having played any of them for the reasons outlined in the last paragraph. Pretty much everyone tells me that Last of Us is great, annoying that it still hasn't received a PC port.

"Please Just Fucking Tell Me What Term I Am Allowed to Use for the Sweeping Social and Political Changes You Demand". Didn't realise that @roystgnr linked to this article in their comment, making my link redundant.

I mean, the leg amputated in the 1990s I quoted above.

Sorry, I missed that.

I'm not claiming it has no relationship to trans activism, just that "The Anglophone medical establishment appears to be fully ideologically captured" isn't a justified conclusion from this particular amputation and a single paper connecting BID to transgender people.

Fair point.

Savita Halappanavar's death

Such an obvious one, don't know how I forgot it.

Ugh, I can't watch more than five seconds because I know where it's going.

Woah, what happened to the formatting there?

I wanted to put in a horizontal line to separate the body of the post from the footnotes. If you neglect to put a paragraph break between the preceding paragraph and the four hyphens, it treats the entire paragraph as a header.

One of the most recent videos is by Andrew Callaghan interview

I heard he was MeToo'd awhile back, did anything come of that?

1951, apparently, so it strictly speaking predates the sexual revolution.

I live in Ireland and still get my fair share of slagging. A few years ago I could hardly leave the house without someone pointing at me and saying "hey look lads, Ed Sheeran's on tour!" but that dropped off after I lost weight.

And is it really possible for an intelligent human to both understand a book like Crime and Punishment and read it and be emotionally indifferent to it?

Why not? There are lots of stories which I understand perfectly well but which leave me cold.

Thanks for the tip, it's not mentioned anywhere on the Wikipedia page.

let me know if anything actually happens

Unanimously approved.

I will caution you that if you buy a hard copy of Lost Girls, do not read it on the bus. People will assume that you're reading child pornography, and with good reason.

Pity Hlynka isn't here, he'd have liked you.

Agreed on both counts.

To be fair, he could well have changed his mind in the intervening two years.

the stronger one gets the backlash because they are the ones committing the attrocities.

I find the use of the definite article here fascinating.