@Iconochasm's banner p

Iconochasm

All post-temple whore technology is gay.

3 followers   follows 10 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:44:49 UTC

				

User ID: 314

Iconochasm

All post-temple whore technology is gay.

3 followers   follows 10 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:44:49 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 314

“That’s victim blaming, straight up,” in state law, said Stefan Turkheimer, vice president of public policy for RAINN, the largest anti-sexual violence organization in the U.S. “It prevents a lot of cases from coming forward, where prosecutors are reluctant to try to push forward on a case where the person is incapacitated due to voluntary intoxication.”

I completely agree. It is unconscionable to allow this predator to roam free after she raped those two men. After all, her own description strongly suggests that they were drunker/more drugged than her. The fact that they made the offer doesn't absolve her of the fact that they were too intoxicated to be responsible for their choices.

I can tell you that it is entirely possible to raid while bottle-feeding an infant.

Eh, Thrall is green Jesus who just wants peace and freedom for his people. When you first encounter the trolls in WC3, they're a literal foodslave race. The Tauren are Native Americans. The undead just want to understand their place in the world, find out who they really are, maaaaan.

That's at least an outlook you can take that is consistent with the lore. But personally, I agree, fuck all that whiney pussy shit. Lok'tar Ogar! For Hellscream!

Congratulations! Enjoy the hell out of it, bro. It passes quicker than you think. What comes later is good too, but different good. There's only so many months when the little one is overwhelmed with excitement because "Dada! Dada!" came home.

Fair enough. The corruption argument has also been exhaustively covered, from a few different angles. I do think the "public corruption vs private corruption" angle is the strongest one for Trump supporters to lean on there, but I don't think The Motte has discussed Hunter Biden's memecoin rugpull yet.

It seems that in her initial interview with the police last year, she said she was offered a threesome and accepted (at least in part) because she hoped that meant the two hot frat guys were going to be gay with each other, too. A third guy asked to join in. She said no because she assumed that meant upping the ante to include anal, and Guy #3 left without a fuss.

There's a bit more variation on that than you'd expect.

I'm sure it's not universal, but I've had a fair number of gay acquaintances explicitly call the female plumbing "disgusting", with no real prompting. Made it seem like a common and commonly expressed sentiment.

Meanwhile, actual gay guys: What? No. Hell no. God, fuck no. Get your gross-ass pussy out of here. No one wants to see that.

What are the odds Cornell settles anyway, for the sake of ideology and bad press?

He means it's been a stereotype for a long time, back when the US was more Christian, that many people take as a presumed truth about the world in spite of never seeing any stats or details.

Free as in speech or free as in beer?

Ah. That specifically looks like a quote reply. Why not show the actual quote?

Yaoi and it's consequences...

I was somewhat surprised when I read today that this conclusive proof does sort of exist, in the form of a Snapchat screenshot wherein someone in the fraternity's group chat posted that there was "free pussy upstairs". It's not quite conclusive proof, but it's much better proof than I expected. At this point my assessment is that the accusation is probably basically real.

Does this screenshot actually exist? The articles I saw referencing it were so vague and carefully phrased and caveated that I can say with certainty is that someone claims that such a screenshot exists, and implies that it is in reference to this woman.

I'll also note that those articles said that her initial interview with police described everything as consensual, including the sex and drug use, and specifically included language that her request to stop was respected.

I'm still leaning towards "girl had quite the party, then weeks later after conference with her friends/suspicion from her boyfriend decided it was rape."

There were three clauses in that quote. I'll accept your admission for the first and last.

For the second... yes, you can make a strong argument for Trump's personal corruption, as porkpiehat said, though in Biden's case it wasn't for lack of trying. Also as PPH said, the institutional corruption Biden/Harris facilitated is unprecedented, on the level of "civilizational ruin".

Hobbyist gun-owners face gun-abolition threats from Dems precisely because 2nd amendment nuts oppose sensible limitations on mentally ill and untrained gun-owners.

The people pushing those limits are not sensible, will not restrict themselves to the mentally ill, and openly talk about how this is a wedge to eventually disarm the population entirely. Perhaps your contempt would be better directed at the controllers, to encourage them to learn literally anything about how guns work and how people use them.

NeverTrumpers like the Bulwark guys were vehemently opposed to him long before Jan 6th. Their hostility feels much more in line with the old adage that the worst thing that can happen to a socialist is for socialists to come to power who are not his friends.

Also the dishonesty, personal corruption and incompetence.

This is an incoherent stand to take for anyone who voted for Biden and Harris. It would be like MAGA insisting they despise '28 cadidate AOC because she lacks gravitas and decorum.

I was once very aggressively stopped by the police while on foot. Three of them ran up and surrounded me while yelling into radios. My reaction was sheer confusion, and by the time I understood what was happening, they decided I wasn't the guy they were looking for and started to move on. One lingered a moment to say "I knew it wasn't you. You were way too calm".

The whole experience lasted 30s.

And that's just not true as a categorical statement. Dominic Pezzola smashed a Capitol window with a stolen police shield and used it to gain entry. Christopher Worrell was wearing a tactical vest and carrying pepper gel. Michael Sauer was wearing a ballistic vest, Kevlar gloves and a balaclava and deployed chemical spray against police.

This is praising with faint damning.

Okay, they shouldn't do that shit and they should be arrested if and when they try and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, or any similar government proceeding. I'm not going to defend that shit.

The point is that they do, irl, in fact, get to do that. And even when they do much more extreme things like launch sniper ambushes on ICE officers, it's only the people actually present who get charged, so far as I am aware.

Tarrio did not breach the capitol, much less in tactical gear. The people who did were unarmed. Leftists interrupt similar events on a routine basis - it doesn't make the news because it's totally expected. They get escorted out, maybe some arrested for a few hours (just for bragging rights), and then the next group is brought in to start screaming and disrupting the proceedings.

This is funny given the verb you used to describe the maybe-entrapment the Wolverine Watchmen faced was a program that almost solely targeted leftists.

Serious question: when was the last leftist group that got entrapped? All the recent ones I can think of involved bullets fired at government agents.

Or is the goal to get boomers all worked up about dangerous right wing ideologies.

Yes. They still trust whatever the TV tells them. The fact that many have left the reservation because they also trust whatever the TV on their phone tells them means the people still making trad media content feel like they need to triple-down on the propaganda even harder.

I'm more referring to incidents where some gun is left out and a curious infant goes and shoot himself or something else.

Seems to happen approximately 100 times per year for kids up to 5.

Yes, exactly what he said. The law is swift and brutal to you, not to underclass criminals.

A lot of right wingers are saying “this is what LEFTISM is” but it’s not like the Right responded to the excesses of Woke by reaffirming the need for being grounded in reason and facts!

How would she know? Would she admit that even if it were true?

The thing is, I honestly think they did (to a fair degree, with caveats, etc). I couldn't have imagined thinking of myself as any kind of conservative 10 years. But the difference between the right now and the right pre-GamerGate is huge. They really do seem, on average, to be much more sane and reasonable and realistic than they were.

And it's really juxtaposed by the way I think most of the left went completely off the rails and untethered.