Iconochasm
All post-temple whore technology is gay.
No bio...
User ID: 314
Black people do in fact usually have IDs. The people most likely to be loose in the world without one are professional white women who think their phone is a scifi universal gadget.
The big obstacle with Real ID is getting an appointment in the first place. Every time I hear about it, the waitlist is months long.
Antarctic research station should be sufficient, no?
Andrew Anglin announced total Hebrew victory and unconditionally surrendered to ZOG by closing Daily Stormer.
End of an era. 13 years long battle is over.
Trust the Zion plan.
Say what you will about the Zionists, but they do appear to the only non-American faction with any measurable amount of both competence and agency.
Heftige Rivalität, soon on Netflix.
Outsiders using low-resolution judgment means that movements have an incentive to clean up their act. A high-resolution one would let them reap the benefits and face none of the consequences.
In other words, you can't complain about being called a communist unless you have enemies to the left.
What's Andy Samberg doing these days?
The sheer Larry David-esque humor potential would greatly bolster the "dankest timeline" hypothesis.
Could be some unrelated medical issue. The guy is 76.
Supposedly his dad was adamantly against him taking over, possibly for being gay, possibly for being an idiot.
Maybe the coma is a feature not a bug - he makes a decent figurehead, while being too incapacitated to attempt to actually rule, while also being totally expendable. Same logic as electing Biden, and it fits with the "mosaic" approach.
I’m still trying to figure out how this is their fault, given the Republican trifecta;
Republicans do not have a filibuster-proof trifecta, and Dems used that to block DHS funding, while demanding completely insane poison pills to functionally stop immigration enforcement and open ICE agents to more leftist terror attacks. Your flight was delayed to fight for this for the whole country.
We're not an antifa group, that's just an idea. We're a book and movie club. We all met at Agatha's house where we watched One Battle After Another and then debated it over vegan snacks. That's why all of our phones were in one place and turned off for the duration.
Kevin McCallister could handle these arrangements. I believe in our leftist terrorists, that they too can aspire to the level of planning and agency displayed by a fictional 8 year old from 1990.
Yeah, the unstated premise there was "assuming you don't get caught". If you get busted in flagrante delicto then I can see how that would make things worse. But if you even hoped to get away with it, not having the tracking device in your pocket with a time-stamped trail is a good idea.
Zoomer criminals just leave the damn phone at home challenge [IMPOSSIBLE!!!].
I made the same conclusion, and based it off a series of article from 15 years ago, written by his professors, ostensibly as a tribute.
Do you know how he got that job? According to the guy who recruited him (note the recruited), the process began at a meeting where someone said "Hey, we're a law school in Chicago, a super black city, and we have basically no black faculty. Maybe we should do something about that?" And someone else said "I hear the kid running the Harvard Law review this year is black." "Great, go hire him."
I had heard for years that he was the only editor of the HLR to never write an article. One of his own spokesmen confirmed that, as referenced in this bizarre time-traveling Politico article that claims to have found a "lost" Obama article, without ever getting around to mentioning how it was found.
Anyway, Chicago hired him without actually having a real spot, so they paid him for a few years to take a sabbatical (before ever actually doing any law professor work) so he could write a book on constitutional law. At the end of that time period, what he purportedly handed in was his autobiography, Dreams from my Father. And UChicago just... took that.
That was a recurring theme in those retrospectives written when he was still new and fresh. The man never found a room he couldn't walk into and instantly have every irresponsible white progressive go "Wow, he's so handsome and articulate and black! That guy's getting an A!"
And the kicker is, I think Obama is actually a smart guy. The few ideas he bothered to have were actually pretty good. But the way his professors and mentors talked about him, no one ever felt the need to push or challenge him. Even just make him do the standard work. He's kind of the epitome of what Vivek crashed out about the Christmas before last, the Zack from Saved by the Bell guy who skated through on raw charisma, and could have probably benefited from some more serious study time. Maybe then he wouldn't have had to resort to regurgitating bong-circle Marxism on the rare occasions where he was pressed for a real answer.
Give a fig leaf so a sympathetic juror can do some jury nullification?
What supplement brands (vitamins, minerals, creatine, pre-workout, etc) do you trust and use? How did you make that determination?
because what other sources are there at the moment, really?
None. Even "independent" news are required to toe the Iranian party line as a condition on being allowed into the country.
Hang it in the Louve next to the "pretending not to understand things" tweet.
But do tell me: in what sense are Americans not (or ever) "civilized"? Non-rhetorically. Step up. What do those words mean?
I actually found myself nodding along with him. America has never been fully settled, such that it's occupants are forced to turn viciously on each other in red status games. Americans have always had PVE as an outlet, as a way to foster trust and self-regulation and prosocial behavior. We're built for PVE, and we're so good at it and it's so rewarding that when we try our hand at guild war PVP, we roflstomp.
Compare that to a "late stage" civilization like China or India or Persia where the only way to get ahead is to screw over someone else. There's only so many spots in the civil service, so every Chinese kid who makes the cut necessarily means another doesn't. This creates an environment where being good or competent in an objective sense is less important than outperforming peers. To them, we look like little kids who haven't internalized tiger mom knife-fighting.
To us, they look like savages stabbing themselves for pitiful loot because they don't grok "trust".
Or at least, that's the rough sketch of an idea that's been kicking around in my head for a few weeks.
"And have you stopped lynching the black people?" the genocidal tyrant asked smugly, as he washed in his daily bloodbath squeezed from more victims than the entire history of the KKK.
And the current paradigm is that if your goal is something other than "killing enemies" then you should use a different tool than the "enemy killing organization". Using the Enemy Killing Organization for non-Enemy Killing purposes is often ineffective and inefficient, and degrades the ability of the Enemy Killing Organization to kill enemies.
I'm confused. How many people in the US would be actually surprised/outraged if we got into a hot war and someone bombed a military base, which also had a school on it?
Plenty of people. It's just that there's very little overlap with the set of people who are upset about the bombing of this school.
Because your take is pure Arguments as Soldiers. When I saw the NYT article on the topic, clawing at implication and carefully phrased vagaries to push a narrative as hard as they could with extremely limited facts and knowledge, it just made me recall the old line "They're not anti-war. They're just on the other side." Remember, the only source we even have for the casualty count is the Iranian government. How much do you trust them? The US has hit Iran with thousands of bombs and the general level of precision is terrifying sci-fi absurdity. There's Iranian doctors purportedly reporting that literally every single casualty they've seen is non-civilian. Meanwhile, Iran responded by flinging missiles willy-nilly all over the region, including a bunch of civilian targets that no one cares about because it's just brown people failing at killing brown people.
Focusing all your attention on the single incident that might possibly have been the US hitting a civilian target is so obviously bad faith that it requires years of brainwashing and hyper-selective framing to take your performative outrage seriously.
"The US fired 3000 bombs and only a single one was possibly a misidentified target or misfired. That means the US has less shit happen during war than any other army in the combined history of humanity. Maybe that should make them much more comfortable going to war than any other polity that has ever existed on the face of the earth."
Christ.

Blue state blues. On the plus side, I've been renewing my old-style license online and having it mailed to me since the Obama administration.
More options
Context Copy link