Iconochasm
All post-temple whore technology is gay.
No bio...
User ID: 314
It's the intersection of athleticism and upper-class coding. Think of the stereotype of a desirable man from a romance novel. Tall, handsome, rich, jacked, with the arrogance and domineering attitude that results. Get a lacrosse all-star bit by a werewolf and he's basically the ideal man to a large portion of the women in America.
You know what'll fix the birthrate crisis? Criminalizing Netflix for young parents. And books, too, probably.
Yes, there's a point where ignoring your kid while mechanically caring for them is a problem, but infants spent a lot of time being uninteractive and holding them is pretty much all you need to be doing.
WoW also has a lot of interesting colors and shapes for a toddler to look at while they sit on Daddy's lap and watch him tank Illidan. Important lessons to absorb about leadership, coordination, and internet/chan culture, too.
It's a bit of a personal topic for me. I literally met her mother on WoW, and it took a while to unravel us from the guild I led after real life took precedence.
Case in point for how similar woman and men are: from their writing, art, etc. you may guess right well over 50%, but it's impossible to reliably infer someone's sex. Multiple famous novelists and mangakas have been women who wrote under men's names, and anecdotally, I've heard multiple women surprised that their favorite fanfiction's author is male.
Eh, I feel like it's more 80-90% reliable. Men and women consistently focus on different little details. I can only think of one example where I was genuinely unsure, though admittedly I can't know if I've ever been totally fooled.
“That’s victim blaming, straight up,” in state law, said Stefan Turkheimer, vice president of public policy for RAINN, the largest anti-sexual violence organization in the U.S. “It prevents a lot of cases from coming forward, where prosecutors are reluctant to try to push forward on a case where the person is incapacitated due to voluntary intoxication.”
I completely agree. It is unconscionable to allow this predator to roam free after she raped those two men. After all, her own description strongly suggests that they were drunker/more drugged than her. The fact that they made the offer doesn't absolve her of the fact that they were too intoxicated to be responsible for their choices.
I can tell you that it is entirely possible to raid while bottle-feeding an infant.
Eh, Thrall is green Jesus who just wants peace and freedom for his people. When you first encounter the trolls in WC3, they're a literal foodslave race. The Tauren are Native Americans. The undead just want to understand their place in the world, find out who they really are, maaaaan.
That's at least an outlook you can take that is consistent with the lore. But personally, I agree, fuck all that whiney pussy shit. Lok'tar Ogar! For Hellscream!
Congratulations! Enjoy the hell out of it, bro. It passes quicker than you think. What comes later is good too, but different good. There's only so many months when the little one is overwhelmed with excitement because "Dada! Dada!" came home.
Fair enough. The corruption argument has also been exhaustively covered, from a few different angles. I do think the "public corruption vs private corruption" angle is the strongest one for Trump supporters to lean on there, but I don't think The Motte has discussed Hunter Biden's memecoin rugpull yet.
It seems that in her initial interview with the police last year, she said she was offered a threesome and accepted (at least in part) because she hoped that meant the two hot frat guys were going to be gay with each other, too. A third guy asked to join in. She said no because she assumed that meant upping the ante to include anal, and Guy #3 left without a fuss.
There's a bit more variation on that than you'd expect.
I'm sure it's not universal, but I've had a fair number of gay acquaintances explicitly call the female plumbing "disgusting", with no real prompting. Made it seem like a common and commonly expressed sentiment.
Meanwhile, actual gay guys: What? No. Hell no. God, fuck no. Get your gross-ass pussy out of here. No one wants to see that.
What are the odds Cornell settles anyway, for the sake of ideology and bad press?
He means it's been a stereotype for a long time, back when the US was more Christian, that many people take as a presumed truth about the world in spite of never seeing any stats or details.
Free as in speech or free as in beer?
Ah. That specifically looks like a quote reply. Why not show the actual quote?
Yaoi and it's consequences...
I was somewhat surprised when I read today that this conclusive proof does sort of exist, in the form of a Snapchat screenshot wherein someone in the fraternity's group chat posted that there was "free pussy upstairs". It's not quite conclusive proof, but it's much better proof than I expected. At this point my assessment is that the accusation is probably basically real.
Does this screenshot actually exist? The articles I saw referencing it were so vague and carefully phrased and caveated that I can say with certainty is that someone claims that such a screenshot exists, and implies that it is in reference to this woman.
I'll also note that those articles said that her initial interview with police described everything as consensual, including the sex and drug use, and specifically included language that her request to stop was respected.
I'm still leaning towards "girl had quite the party, then weeks later after conference with her friends/suspicion from her boyfriend decided it was rape."
There were three clauses in that quote. I'll accept your admission for the first and last.
For the second... yes, you can make a strong argument for Trump's personal corruption, as porkpiehat said, though in Biden's case it wasn't for lack of trying. Also as PPH said, the institutional corruption Biden/Harris facilitated is unprecedented, on the level of "civilizational ruin".
Hobbyist gun-owners face gun-abolition threats from Dems precisely because 2nd amendment nuts oppose sensible limitations on mentally ill and untrained gun-owners.
The people pushing those limits are not sensible, will not restrict themselves to the mentally ill, and openly talk about how this is a wedge to eventually disarm the population entirely. Perhaps your contempt would be better directed at the controllers, to encourage them to learn literally anything about how guns work and how people use them.
NeverTrumpers like the Bulwark guys were vehemently opposed to him long before Jan 6th. Their hostility feels much more in line with the old adage that the worst thing that can happen to a socialist is for socialists to come to power who are not his friends.
Also the dishonesty, personal corruption and incompetence.
This is an incoherent stand to take for anyone who voted for Biden and Harris. It would be like MAGA insisting they despise '28 cadidate AOC because she lacks gravitas and decorum.
I was once very aggressively stopped by the police while on foot. Three of them ran up and surrounded me while yelling into radios. My reaction was sheer confusion, and by the time I understood what was happening, they decided I wasn't the guy they were looking for and started to move on. One lingered a moment to say "I knew it wasn't you. You were way too calm".
The whole experience lasted 30s.
And that's just not true as a categorical statement. Dominic Pezzola smashed a Capitol window with a stolen police shield and used it to gain entry. Christopher Worrell was wearing a tactical vest and carrying pepper gel. Michael Sauer was wearing a ballistic vest, Kevlar gloves and a balaclava and deployed chemical spray against police.
This is praising with faint damning.
Okay, they shouldn't do that shit and they should be arrested if and when they try and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, or any similar government proceeding. I'm not going to defend that shit.
The point is that they do, irl, in fact, get to do that. And even when they do much more extreme things like launch sniper ambushes on ICE officers, it's only the people actually present who get charged, so far as I am aware.
Tarrio did not breach the capitol, much less in tactical gear. The people who did were unarmed. Leftists interrupt similar events on a routine basis - it doesn't make the news because it's totally expected. They get escorted out, maybe some arrested for a few hours (just for bragging rights), and then the next group is brought in to start screaming and disrupting the proceedings.
This is funny given the verb you used to describe the maybe-entrapment the Wolverine Watchmen faced was a program that almost solely targeted leftists.
Serious question: when was the last leftist group that got entrapped? All the recent ones I can think of involved bullets fired at government agents.
- Prev
- Next

I think the biggest tell is how they focus on people, on the relations between them. Men and women have different ways of assessing the men and women around them, different ways of relating to the same and opposite sex.
This is another huge one, especially in the field of pseudonym-cloaked online writing. In theory, I know literally nothing about author CoffeeBacon666, but in practice their female main character is just an autistic dude in a dress with some childish affections.
I could see myself being more confused in a genre I was less familiar with. It would be interesting to take on a challenge like "Read these three mystery writers. All have male names, but some of them are actually female writers. Can you figure it out?"
More options
Context Copy link