@No_one's banner p

No_one


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users  
joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.

Verified Email

				

User ID: 1042

No_one


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users   joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

					

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.


					

User ID: 1042

Verified Email

I mean, the tech doesn't exist for either asteroid mining, or AI that could run and maintain mining for years. Also, on average you'd have to wait 2, 3 years before anything even arrives, lowest transit time is 18 months with about 5000 m/s dV. That's near the upper bound for what's possible in a single stage rocket.

Unless someone invents an inertialess space drive you have nothing to worry about. All the promising asteroids are very, very far away, with a simple return trajectory being at best what, 3 years and at worst way more.

but you can't help but notice that we've nearly x5 the money supply since December 2019.

Is that true? I was looking at M2 money supply recently and supposedly it's up by 50% since '19. So not 500% but 50%.

That guy seems like a blowhard.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ceskPbDtTzY

He's talking how Grad missiles would look the same as GMLRS on Russian radar and thus could complicate shooting down GMLRS strikes. That's bullshit. Grad has a range of what, 20 kilometers. GMLRs, ranging 80 km was used for targets up to 50 km behind the front and was great for precisely that - forcing Russian logistics to move out of range, thus complicating it. Targets that can be ranged by Grads could be engaged with 6" artillery or rocket launchers, so he looks kind of stupid here.

Anyway, Ukrainians did manage to strike some targets by firing in salvos and making interception harder by also firing some of their old and probably irreplaceable Uragan rockets to saturate the defences, but they ran out eventually (probably in '23 or '24).

does Xi really need to trump up corruption charges

It probably takes a fanatic or an autist to avoid doing even a little corruption if you're in charge of gigantic amounts of military procurement or a general officer in an army that is, then, very corrupt. Zhang looks like he was a competent but personable, likable guy. So, not a fanatic nor an autist. In addition, Chinese evolved to love to squirrel away a little money for harder times. There were huge amounts of corruption in the PLA in 90s and 00s. Combine the times and being selected from people who always saved something for a rainy day and the odds are there was no need to trump up charges because there was some little or not so little discreet cushion somewhere and Zhang didn't expect it'd be used against him.

There is no moral difference between being a liar and someone who achieves the same ends with deliberate misdirection.

One could even argue someone like NYT who is usually somewhat correct if selectively ignoring certain things, but will readily deceive in critical moments is worse than a liar, because they're better at deception.

Sure. It's not lying when, while covering a topic you engage in wholesale misdirection by deliberately burying the lede in one half of a sentence 3/4 down the article.

That's fine. It's not deceptive at all.

That's what trade journalists do.

Normal journalists have political agendas.

It's not amazing.

NYT has been like this last 30 years. The only exception I know of was Nicholas Wade who for a long time was a science reporter before getting axed.

I would quibble with your designation of Facebook, Wikipedia as 'cultural centres of the online world'. Unless that was sarcasm ofc.

Yeah, the internet is blocked off for the electorate, but anyone exhibiting the tiniest bit of interest can bypass it.

E.g. a computer game that was wholly banned in China had 40% of global players from China.

Well, it's ruining your, not my country, so I'm not going to argue that it's not inevitable when you clearly desire the ends of said policy.

Chinese have internet, dude. They're extremely common in online games. Some probably even post on theMotte.

You can go on Chinese twitter, loads of action, mostly related to advertising pornography and prostitutes.

pan European problem

You don't get to conflate Italian organised crime with North African gangs. Distinct genetics and history.

Give it a few years. You remind me of the Europeans saying this same shit about America back in early 1900s.

E.g. Wilde with his quote ~"America is the only nation that passed from barbarism to decadence without ever having been civilized".

You can find plenty of examples here

nobody likes what they produce

?? If that's the case, why do they have an absolutely gigantic trade surplus despite being the world's largest raw material importér?