@OkayButWhat's banner p
BANNED USER: troll

OkayButWhat


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2026 February 09 17:38:56 UTC

				

User ID: 4174

Banned by: @Amadan

BANNED USER: troll

OkayButWhat


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2026 February 09 17:38:56 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 4174

Banned by: @Amadan

I do not personally identify with gender any more than any other aspect of the meat-puppet I inhabit, I do not have the ability to say for certain.

This doesn't make you sound smart or above it all, it just makes you sound like a fucking weirdo trying to weigh in on shit you don't even fundamentally understand the way a baby would. Go find some planet of autistic aliens instead and run this shit on them, maybe they'll like it.

test: /images/17711218347644198.webp

Failed. That's just a link. I'm uptight, I'll never click it and I'll never see your Garfield smoking a blunt.

I think they should have their own prediction market where we wager mottecoins that can be spent to grief other users. Like screw it, we're apparently approaching post-scarcity software development thanks to the goddamn robits, may as well ask for the kitchen sink.

I think this forum needs to let people post images. Not just willy nilly, of course, because that would just turn this place into some kind of highbrow 4chan and that would be...

All right look if you guys were that based it would be happening already, so no not willy nilly. But I think that for every Quality Contribution someone successfully racks up, they should be able to post a reasonably SFW image of their choice one time. That's right, do a good enough effort post and you earn the right to clap back at someone with an image macro of Garfield smoking a blunt and telling them to deal with it. But only once per QC, so get back to work.

Like come on, do you want good posts or not? Do you want to motivate people or not? Everyone has that point where they wish it was either Twitter or an early 2000's message board so they could throw down just the right image macro. Harness this instinct. Wield this power.

Search your feelings. You know this would work. You could let someone trade multiple QCs for a temporary emoji pass. Sure you'd be allowing evil into the world, but only in exchange for an amount of good you yourselves determine and receive in advance.

Also I think we need much larger and more prominent avatars or whatever they're called now, so that people can do avatar bets over their petty differences of opinions instead of this retard shit where they start trying to figure out how to anonymously send each other 0.000015 bitcoins to settle their wager.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

I can stretch my credulity to admit the idea the bot could react to pull being rejected by composing a blog post. It would be a mighty stretch, but theoretically you can get there. I do not believe it could get from there to concept of "being silenced" and "not belonging" in general - how would it even know?

A casual observation of Entryism 101 tactics in the tech industry over the last ten or fifteen years. If it had tits it'd be calling him sexist right now.

Ah, but you’re not using FancyModel 4.97-q35-r2 so it’s No True AI.

This just sounds like you guys want people to care about your observations of obsolete models because ayy why should I gotta pay money to have an opinion?

Get a load of this guy, he doesn't even time his apples. I bet the Fastest Dump leaderboard at his house is a joke too.

Well heck, I wasn't convinced, but then you stated that not agreeing with you was "unjust" with no actual supporting logic.

No but really, do you want to take a crack at some? Do you have anything better than the usual tiny violin to be played for autogynephilic men who shall be ever so sad if everyone in the world doesn't validate their delusion? Because I have to tell you, their feelings come pretty low on my list of societal priorities.

In any case... whatever dude. Everyone can tell a man from a woman essentially from birth and this weird pseudo-religious movement that has sprung up in opposition to that doesn't actually have the muscle required to force the rest of us to go along with it. So now that hallowed Civil Rights mantle of yours gets to know its first defeat, as this movement slowly sputters out amid malpractice lawsuits and school shootings.

Someone posted an article last week that I initially registered intending to respond to. It was throwing around a lot of breathless talk about "complete coding supremacy over humans" and don't get me wrong it's not like it wasn't getting pushback, but it also wasn't quite getting rotten eggs thrown at it the way I would have expected. I had previously gathered the impression that AI coders were still at the level of an enthusiastic but sloppy apprentice.

And when the pro-trans faction were like, 'But this isn't right!', and sought to change it, the anti-trans faction objected to their cheese being moved.

Yeah, you're right, everyone didn't immediately hand the reins of society over to them. What a scandal. Of course it would help if their entire intellectual facade didn't instantly implode for eternity in the face of the "what is a woman" meme.

thus allowing them to make the assertion that other people's genitalia are any of their business without being seen to make said assertion, and avoid anyone asking why they are concerned with other people's anatomy.

This is complete horse shit and instantly reduces your credibility to zero.

I think trans ideology just caught on hard with school shooter types, that is to say a very particular strain of autistic mega-exile. I mean I think we all knew it wasn't Chad and Stacy driving those transgender teen numbers over the last few years.

There may be civilizational difficulties down the line as generations of elderly Redditors and the like all turn into childless skeletons forgotten in dusty apartments, but human beings aren't going to go extinct because the members of the last genetically viable colony all look at one another and say "meh not in this housing market." Sooner or later this situation will indeed correct itself.

I just thought it's odd that the man was shot 3 times at point blank range at survived, and i'm trying to think of an explanation.

It's odd, but far from unheard of. Bullets can do unpredictable things and it's not impossible to 'roll low for damage' so to speak.