Female sexuality is NOT suppose to make logical sense. So it’s the female ID but blown up at macro societal movement scale. The early Game pioneers like that odd Magic guy but also the NYT writer guy who wrote the book The Game had a word for it: Shit Test. So I googled that word and found a definition for it that I think works:
“What Are “Shit Tests,” Really? The term “shit test” isn’t about malicious manipulation. It’s a shorthand for the subtle challenges, disagreements, or uncomfortable situations a woman might introduce into a conversation or interaction. These aren’t always obvious, and they’re rarely intended as deliberate attacks. Instead, they’re often subconscious filters, designed to quickly assess your emotional stability, confidence, integrity, and self-respect , qualities that suggest you’d be a reliable and supportive long-term partner.“
I guess I should cite but no reason to click thru: https://medium.com/@therealdating/decoding-shit-tests-in-dating-a-guide-to-confidence-and-connection-bf3a41ee45c5
So the whole you can’t objectify thing/me is sort of just a giant shit test at a societal level. My gut says any female spouting don’t objective women or me is actually just shit testing. And providing you are the right guy really wants you to have uncontrollable sexual desire for her.
One girl who I sort of loved I remember one day I was walking her home I think after dinner. I think some form of can I come I asked a few times and she said No. 15 minutes after I left I get a text why didn’t you come up. Guess I played it wrong and misread the situation.
Female sexuality should not be looked at thru a rationalist brain. It has its own games it plays.
Admittedly not a toxicologists so I don’t know if that is true. But that case changed a lot of my beliefs. I know longer think we live under the rule of law. I’ve got no problem with Trump setting up billion dollar slush funds with government funds. Having the modern Democrat Party in power is no longer viable. The goal is to win. Accumulate power you can use. Don’t lose it.
I think Thiel likes Argentina long term. They do seem very gay so maybe that’s part of it. Having a friendly government to go to as an escape route must be considered now.
I get you. If your buddy tells you something at a pub (he probably saw on Twitter) it’s more true than something found on the internet.
If it’s an OD it 100% lets Chauvin off the moral hook. You can say he was not competent and should have realized it’s an OD and healed him, but that is potentially an elite talent.
I am not sure how hard it is save George there. I think it’s harder than if you asked me to recite the alphabet. If reciting the alphabet saves him then I am morally culpable. If it was as hard as doing brain surgery then I am not morally culpable.
I don’t believe this is in contention anymore, but I come from the other side. The data looks very clear it was 90% an OD with Chauvin being negligent in realizing he was ODing and providing health care.
So Yes I agree with you this is not in contention. It was just an OD.
Good things happen when you let good people into your country. We get less Sikh guy stabbing whitey in London if we just never let Sikh guy into the country.
Your solution that is something like “I just want competent cops” fails from first principles long term. If you let in population groups with low IQ or moral inferiority or cultural inferiority within a generation or two they will be the majority and just tell you to fuck off.
It’s best to just not let into your country Indian Sikh stabby people.
Though Iran already maxed their ability to hit other countries oil infrastructure. Yes sure a lot of these conversations are just discussing who is holding back military capabilities. The US is 100% avoiding Iranian infrastructure attacks. Iran has hit some oil infrastructure.
I have no idea the reference to Bibi or War crimes. We live in different news source worlds. Seems like a good guy to me.
“Prior knowledge”
Are you claiming you are a victim of Iraqi Chemical attacks and have first hand knowledge?
Wherever your prior knowledge came from….it came from a machine.
Aren’t they usually fine for summarizing research? Ya sure I did the Reddit thing of just googling and pasting first link as source. But I do think the AIs give a generally ok overview.
Disappointed they backed down on this. Political slush funds are very powerful. Being able to reward friends is powerful. Dems ran this playbook for years and the dominated institutions. Having more money for bribes might get more gop working in the beauracracy now if you have money give them a check later.
Dude. You 100% used a machine to research whatever you said occurred in Iran. You used either Wikipedia, Google, or maybe some podcast bro. AI can just scan more data points than google.
You didn’t go to Iran and interview villagers and do soil samples.
FWIW chemical weapons have never been effective in war. History is filled with stories of high civilian casualties and destroying civilian infrastructure led to victory. Roman salted the earth. Mongols slaughtered entire towns who fought to well so other towns would just agree to be slaves. America carpet bombed Europe and nuked Japan. Sherman marched thru Georgia.
It’s factual. From Grok
Key Metrics: F_ST (Fixation Index)
F_ST measures genetic differentiation between populations (0 = identical, 1 = completely different; values are usually small in humans).
• Within India: F_ST between major South Asian groups ranges from 0.02 to 0.15. Overall pooled F_ST 0.072 (95% CI 0.061–0.084). Tribal vs. caste/non-tribal groups can reach 0.15. North Indian Indo-European speakers show high heterozygosity; isolated tribes show lower diversity and higher homozygosity due to endogamy. 
• Between Han Chinese and Europeans/Caucasians: Typically 0.10–0.12. This is a standard continental-scale differentiation value.
Some Indian subgroups are as genetically distant from each other as Europeans are from East Asians. This stems from:
• Ancient Ancestral North Indian (ANI) component (related to West Eurasians, Middle Easterners, Central Asians).
• Ancient Ancestral South Indian (ASI) component (distinct, with deep South Asian roots).
• Later admixtures (e.g., Iranian-related farmers, Steppe pastoralists).
• Long-term endogamy (caste/tribe-specific marriages for 2,000+ years), founder effects, and geographic isolation, which amplify differences. 
India’s 5,000 ethno-linguistic groups, plus waves of migration since 50,000 years ago (mostly from one major Out-of-Africa pulse, with later inputs), create a mosaic. Indians harbor significant unsurveyed variation and higher Neanderthal ancestry diversity than many groups. 
East Asia/China Contrast
Han Chinese (the majority “Chinamen” reference) show low internal diversity. F_ST within Han subgroups is tiny (0.0002–0.001 or so between North/South Han). China overall is far more homogeneous than India or Europe due to historical expansions and less deep structure. 
Europe has moderate internal structure (e.g., North-South or Finland vs. Southern Italy F_ST ~0.01–0.023), but still less than India’s extremes.
Not sure why it copy and pasted like that.
India has more genetic diversity within country than like even an Englishmen to a Chinaman. IQ studies show much of the population is in competition with Africa for lowest IQ population. You can’t have Indian or Pakistani immigration into your country without having heavy filtering.
“Can store them” - eventually run out.
-
if you don’t control your own country and hinterland then the underground missile launch points you propose eventually run out of supplies
-
“who says their starving” That is why you take out civilian infrastructure. Cut electricity, power, key bridges and suddenly your farms don’t have irrigation and the food disappears.
So all you did was ignore the entire point I made of taking out civilian infrastructure. You just ignored it. You didn’t even counter that it would fail for x,y,z reason. Which it may.
How long would America last if a country had air superiority and bombed every power plant and oil refinery?
Just to be clear you quoted sources that indicated “0” recorded instances of Iranian civilian deaths.
Grok say this never happened. And from what I know about the US military they tend to find chemical weapons as not effective but I’m no expert.
How well can a modern army operate without electricity? Can you make drones in the dark? Do starving populations riot for regime change? Do starving soldiers still fight?
There are good reasons to not do things that lead to a large loss of civilian human life. But let’s not act like it wouldn’t be effective.
I am specifically saying “Not if you do war crimes”. We clearly can’t do regime change etc with just air strikes on military targets. But we do have the ability to bomb basically anything in the country. We can nearly completely cut power/water in Iran.
The regime will shoot protestors to maintain power. If we credibly threatened civilian infrastructure and it became topple the regime or die I think we could succeed.
US can end the Iran War in 36 hours if we wanted to. We choose not to because of stupid liberal war ethics. And that’s without using nukes. A few key hits on infrastructure and Iran surrenders.
Irish descent is double Italian descent in America. Both of course sizable. Even if it’s just mostly an Italian map it’s still interesting how every county with a large Italian share all touch each other. The only real link to Pittsburgh is Pittsburgh being the the Western border of that immigration. Italians obviously have a part of the Pittsburgh story.
Twitter got interesting though with the talk about how in some communities everyone knew some Irish-Italian mix kids. Me being one of them from Pittsburgh. And there were a few more kids with Irish first names and Italian last names or the opposite I saw on Twitter of a Maria O’Callahan.
Pittsburgh always has a debate on whether it’s east coast or Midwest or something else. The east coast always felt distant to me but the shared Ellis Island wave is one east coast link.
Someone could probably do an interesting post on the common unique American mixtures. The most recent forming one is probably the white male asian female that seems popular in some areas.
- Prev
- Next

I’ll just take the funny hot take. He’s 100% gay (or bisexual) if he said he would rape a male home intruder. I even have some dominant kinks. At no point have I ever had a thought of raping a guy because I am dominant.
I’ll even admit torture can have value. Perhaps for information. Potentially to discourage future bad behavior in your enemy if you have sufficient power. Like the guys who killed Nowak. I probably feel they should be executed. And I might even want to discourage that behavior in others in the future by not giving them a clean death. But there are lots of ways to torture that don’t involve having sex with them.
More options
Context Copy link