Opt-out
28d ago
IMO Wikipedia has Chile in most studies as majority Europeans. But as an outlier it’s mostly free because a European tortured and killed tens of thousands and then basically agreed to quit doing that if those reforms were largely locked in.
I don’t love yougov for polling but whites are the only group over 50% on capitalism and the only group with a negative favorability of socialism.
So sure maybe there are some exceptions. But a European needs to step in a murder a bunch of people in Chile’s case to do freedom isn’t a great exception.
I’ve seen other polling with negative views on all of the core American values recently.
Opt-out
28d ago
I completely agree we are not the same.
I assume it’s because of mistake theory and you just have a wrong mental model of how the world operates.
People who are NOT Anglo do not have children who support Anglo institutions. Only whiten people in polling have majority support for capitalism, liberalism, and freedom. The most prominent example being that black vote which after all these years votes 85% for the party that supports giving them the most free stuff. It’s less severe with other races but they ALL do the same voting pattern.
The people you won’t deport will have CHILDREN that will vote against your interests. So your children will live in a worse society than you yourself. Your opinion will end up destroying the OUR shire.
Opt-out
28d ago
How would we win “The Peace” in Afghanistan? They aren’t like us.
Victory to me is having as cheap as possible military assets in country to blow up anything that is a future terrorist camp trying to do 9/1
Opt-out
28d ago
IMO Afghanistan is largely a product of blank-slatism. I am myself guilty of this. Mea Culpa.
Fundamentally we all thought Afghanis were just like us. If we bribed them and put them in schools they would become smart competent allies. We have lots of money in America so we can just bribe them to read the right books instead of the wrong books.
In the current wars the Persians actually do have smart competent people. It’s why they had a nuclear program. The correct move in Afghanistan was to just build a well defended base that you can use to go out and kill Afghanis anytime they set up a new terrorist camp and spend zero dollars on schools for girls.
Opt-out
28d ago
Mexico is 88% + Christian. Zambia, DR Congo, Rwanda, Republic of Congo are all 88% + Christian. Gary, Indian is 88% black and doesn’t have electricity. Plenty of shithole countries that have your beliefs but the wrong demographics.
Meanwhile I can just go chill in leftist havens in New England with the right demographics that are heaven.
Opt-out
28d ago
A black and brown majority capitalist country does not exists. It’s a fiction that doesn’t exists.
And then America you claim to want was built and created with all its institutions when it was 88% white.
I reject your question. I’m NOT that stupid. I can in fact walk and chew gum at the same time. I don’t choke on gum when I try to walk and die.
Being that I am in fact a real person with some functional ability (however limited) I can both be racists and anti-communists at the same time which is essentially what you are proposing.
If I want to quickly model what makes a country rich it’s basically be heavily white/Asian and be not communists.
But just for fun If I had to choose someone from my race or someone with the right beliefs whose Haitian I am choosing my race. Bill Ackman’s daughter says she learned to love communism at Harvard. We can fix her and we can fix her children. So I’ll take that person everyday.
Opt-out
29d ago
Speech maximalists fundamentally fail because it requires speech maximalism to be the ultimate good. If Che Guevara is winning but you have one final moment to stop his movement and hang him and essentially protect your shire almosts everyone is choosing to hang him. And the US government and people have chosen this route many times.
Sometimes you need to be anti-liberal to save liberalism.
Why do I have to choose between your conditions? It’s not an either/or.
I can care about someone’s genetic makeup and care if they share my interests or want me dead.
Isn’t your question obviously a false conundrum?
I supported Pinochet killing communists and I am anti-immigration of bad genetic fits.
Public polling shows non-whites and in fact every non-white race on net being against traditional liberalism. A persons father is a great predictor for whether they will be against your interests.
Opt-out
29d ago
Non blank slatist liberalism is extremely complex because you would essentially need different rules for different groups. Whose actually accomplish something like this? 1865-1960 Southern United States?
Opt-out
29d ago
Anyone who makes “morality” arguments like yourself is a spiritual rightists. It’s the same people who in the ‘90s did a morality crusade against rap music.
“A New permanent underclass”
Your response: No….speak Spanish and have darker skin.
Where are you disagreeing. That is a new larger working class with different demographics.
And polls show that there are certain characters that do matter. White working class vote GOP and broadly support Capitalism and Democracy. Brown working class polls have shown do not majority support these things.
But regardless even if you want to claim there is no difference (which is false) you have changed the population pyramid ratio of day laborers to engineers. Which matters.
And a further important point if you have a society where all the brown people clean houses and the white people are rich the brown people will end up viewing themselves as the lower class. White laborers will look at Elon Musks and believe their kids can be Elon Musks.
Opt-out
29d ago
“responsibility of group members for the behavior of other group members. If the group is just something you are born into and says nothing about your relation to other group members, this doesn't make sense.”
I don’t think they would have a responsibility in moral sense. But as far as DNA is essentially Code then people who share DNA are likely to behave in the same way and if the fathers program does murder it is likely Sons code will do murder. Etc.
Maybe the woke can successfully bring back wife beating like they did racism.
I was wrongly remember a Nixons tape quote where he said the Irish drink and beat their wives, but I guess the official version was they can’t drink and get mean.
Now I think we’ve stamped out completely domestic violence within the wokes in-group and it’s only in minority groups.
More options
Context Copy link