@RandomRanger's banner p

RandomRanger

Just build nuclear plants!

5 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 05 00:46:54 UTC

				

User ID: 317

RandomRanger

Just build nuclear plants!

5 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 05 00:46:54 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 317

Exactly, I thought he was going to go on about the guys who are sarcastically defending male serial killers the way the girlies were. That is a bit obnoxious and certainly doesn't improve this toxic discourse.

But no, he's complaining about perfectly normal and reasonable responses:

“SMITE THAT DASTARDLY WOMAN AND HER ANNOYING TIKTOK DEFENDERS” is not impressive reasoning, fellas. If your only reaction to the harrowing outlier tragedy of Lindsay Clancy is to just snarl with animalistic fury at this beleaguered woman, and demand — countervailing evidence be damned — that she be locked up for life in prison, or as many men (but almost zero women) seem to crave, executed on the spot — that’s not an impulse borne of any considered moral judgment.

Sometimes women are in fact dastardly and tiktokers are annoying/cringe. Blow the murderess's head off and let's be done with this. Moral intuitions don't have to be sophisticated if the case is simple. He's found some 200 (verbal) IQ way to sneer in exactly the wrong direction and then spent thousands and thousands of words on this! It's just insane and bizarre, Hanania-esque contrarianism to take an extremely simple case and make all these random analogies 'oh this other psychotic woman thought she was possessed by the devil and so she killed her kids because she thought it was right - let that sink in chuds.' This isn't 7th century Franconia, thinking you are possessed by the devil does not pass muster for legal or moral defence.

Much that's wrong in our civilization derives from a love of complexity and nuance for their own sake.