SecureSignals
No bio...
User ID: 853
Beware of black-pills by people who hate America.
Growing awareness of the extent and mode of operation by Jews in European society has never led to habituation, it has always led to blowback, maybe this time it will be different but the cracks are beginning to show: for the first time ever Americans are more sympathetic to Palestine than Israel (yes that is largely inspired by rote third worldism but every passing day even the third worldists are sounding more antisemitic rather than just pro-Brown.)
The NYT already reported Democrat leaders questioning us being led into this war by Netanyahu, which never even entered the minds of our political representatives during the Iraq war. The Jewish archetype and genius is optimized for maximum effectiveness when it's inscrutable, when it's out in the open it historically does not work very well. Maybe this time it will be different. Or maybe Iran is able to make this war painful for America and its Allies, even if it has no chance of actually winning, and there will be blowback to Israel and diaspora Jews.
Certainly there is no plausible narrative for this war other than being led into it by Israel. You underestimate the pincer movement closing in against Jews and Israel from both the right and the left. A quick victory that beer guzzling Patriots can hang their hat on has the highest chance of fortifying their hegemony, but it's not certain and if this escalates into a prolonged crisis the Jews will be blamed, which did not happen with the Iraq crisis.
What's actually remarkable is that there was no false flag, not even a false pretext like Iraqi WMDs. Trump didn't even try to justify the war to the public to any significant degree. People here are struggling to develop alternative explanations (we are overthrowing Iran because of the protests, funny people actually believe that). There's not even really a solid "narrative" for the apologists for the war. The Administration briefly claimed they had intelligence claiming Iran was planning an attack on US assets, which was immediately debunked by our own intelligence agencies.
So why even need a false flag? They aren't even trying to get the support of the public, they are just doing it, that is a testament to their level of control they don't even go through the motions of trying to justify it. This Rubio statement is literally the best they can come up with! Their hands were tied by Israel, according to them.
With Iraq the dialectic was "we're doing it for Oil" versus "we're doing it to prevent WMDs and spread Democracy" (of course both sides of the dialectic were wrong, we were doing it for Israel). But there's not even anything like that dialectic for this war, Rubio's position is "our hands were tied by Israel". So people who support it and planned it and people who oppose it essentially agree we are being pulled into this by Israel.
SecureSignals
19hr ago
Trump claimed credit for stopping the executions, and the mobilization happened after the protests died down. So he already claimed victory on that front, not to mention the fact that the protests themselves were pushed by the US and Israel.
And earlier you said:
Would Israel not have struck Iran if the U.S. weren't involved?
No they wouldn't have, their plan relied on US involvement and Netanyahu made sure of it.
SecureSignals
19hr ago
You are ignoring the military buildup. Yes, the military buildup would be likely to provoke retaliation, but why do it in the first place? Because America is Israel's bitch and Israel cannot take on Iran alone and it knows it. So Netanyahu goes to Washington, Trump sends an obvious preparation for an attack, and then the US attacks on the logic that an attack would prompt retaliation. It's not a matter of "game theory", it's a matter of the US dancing to the tune of Netanyahu. This buildup was always going to lead to an attack, you don't bluff with that degree of military hardware.
SecureSignals
19hr ago
If Iran attacks the US in response to an attack by Israel, whose fault is it?
It's pretty silly to mass mobilize the military on the border of Iran and then claim a threat of retaliation from an Israeli strike as justification for a "defensive" preemptive strike. If the US didn't build its forces it wouldn't have needed to worry. Iran didn't strike US in 12-day war except as symbolic retaliation for Fordow.
Interesting account from the NYT today about Rubio not disclosing the consideration of a regime-change operation:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel walked into the Oval Office on the morning of Feb. 11, determined to keep the American president on the path to war.
For weeks, the United States and Israel had been secretly discussing a military offensive against Iran. But Trump administration officials had recently begun negotiating with the Iranians over the future of their nuclear program, and the Israeli leader wanted to make sure that the new diplomatic effort did not undermine the plans.
Over nearly three hours, the two leaders discussed the prospects of war and even possible dates for an attack, as well as the possibility — however unlikely — that President Trump might be able to reach a deal with Iran.
Days later, the U.S. president made clear publicly that he was skeptical of the diplomatic route, dismissing the history of negotiating with Iran as merely years of “talking and talking and talking.”
...
But on Feb. 24, hours before Mr. Trump’s annual State of the Union address, congressional leaders from the so-called Gang of Eight gathered in a secure conference room in the Capitol to speak on video teleconference with Mr. Rubio and Mr. Ratcliffe. The two officials were just down Pennsylvania Avenue at the White House, but security arrangements for the president’s speech made the two-mile trip onerous.
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Ratcliffe talked about the intelligence behind the strikes, the possible timing and the potential “offramp”— if the Iranians were to give up nuclear enrichment at upcoming talks.
And yet Mr. Rubio never mentioned that the administration was considering a regime-change operation.
In the briefing, Mr. Rubio argued that, no matter if Israel or the United States struck first, Iran would respond with a powerful barrage of weapons against U.S. bases and embassies. It was logical then, Mr. Rubio said, that the United States should act in concert with Israel, since America would be dragged in anyway. And Israel, Mr. Rubio said, was determined to act.
This logic sat poorly with some Democrats, who thought the Trump administration was letting Mr. Netanyahu dictate American policy — and was making a circular argument that the United States had to attack because its military buildup could prompt Iran to strike.
So Netanyahu walks into the oval office, Trump mobilizes a good portion of our military to defend Israel, then we attack Iran on the logic that Iran would attack user after Israel's attack.
The real question is what did Netanyahu tell Trump in his many visits to the Oval Office.
"the j00s control the government" people were the side that correctly predicted this war during a time it was very unpopular to do so. Trump was promising no Middle East wars in his campaigns, he was campaigning on mass deportations. The most JQ-influenced people, including me, were the ones on the record saying "I don't support Trump because he's owned by the Jews, we won't get mass deportations but he'll bring us to war with Iran." Now it's easy to say broken clock etc. but this was clearly the direction things were heading:
- Benjamin Netanyahu has the best chance he is ever going to have in his entire life of conquering Iran and overthrow the regime. You really think he's just going to walk away and retire in the sunset or something? He's a man of history, he's been planning this his entire political life.
- Yes Trump in particular is owned by the Jews and easily influenced by them (blackmail is potentially in play here as well, we can't know because there is no trust). Combine with point #1 none of us are surprised by the US going all-in now on regime change in Iran, we predicted it.
I also predicted the TikTok acquisition by Netanyahu allies before the law even passed, I predicted Paramount winning over Netflix. Nick Fuentes predicted the entire trajectory of this conflict on October 8th, less than 24 hours after the Hamas attack on Israel:
I'm sure most here have heard of Nick Fuentes, maybe seen clips where he's said something funny or outrageous. I do not consider myself a follower of Fuentes, I have my criticisms of him and his movement, but I have to give credit to Fuentes for churning out consistently correct predictions.
When it came to the Israeli-Gaza war, Nick Fuentes registered these predictions in this short clip, in summary from just the first 60 seconds:
- The Oct. 7 attack is going to be the tripwire that enables Israel to finally solve the Gaza Question with ethnic cleansing.
- Israel is going to conduct a "brutal campaign against Gaza" which they "know Iran has to respond to."
- In doing so, their retaliation against Gaza will knowingly provoke a retaliation from Iranian-backed militias against Israel.
- This will give Israel an excuse to widen the conflict and "to do what they always wanted to do, which is bomb Iran's nuclear program".
- This will initiate war between Iran and Israel, and Israel will draw the United States into the war with Iran- Israel brings in the United States to "put Iran in check."
- This will culminate in an end to the regime in Syria and an end to the regime in Iran.
- This is the big play Israel is making.
Nick Fuentes registered these predictions on October 8th, less than 24 hours after the Hamas attack on Israel. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say Fuentes may have registered the best predictions out of anyone in the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7th (feel free to keep me honest here if you think someone else was even more on the money).
Hindsight bias being what it is, the accuracy of Fuente's predictions may seem less impressive than they actually are. But I still remember the huge amount of uncertainty leading up to the Gaza campaign, including a high degree of uncertainty over the strength of Israel's retaliation against Gaza- whether they would show restraint or even put boots on the ground in the first place, and even if they put boots on the ground would it be a relatively short and mostly symbolic campaign. Certainly at the time "Israel is going to ethnically cleans Gaza, provoke escalations from Iranian militias, and widen the conflict to try to draw the US into war with Iran" was a prediction registered by not very many people.
Fuentes drew a huge amount of criticism for vocally opposing Trump's campaign due to his belief that Israel would draw Trump into war with Iran. A lot of that criticism comes from the "Bronze Age Pervert" sphere, and BAP is a sharp critic of Fuentes for Fuente's low-IQ obsession with da Joos. But we can contrast Fuente's sober-minded and accurate predictions with BAP's own incoherent analysis of the conflict he published last week, chalking it up to some old-man syndrome while remaining baffled as to why Israel is pursuing the strategy it has engaged in since the beginning of the conflict.
At some point, you can just say it's a played out meme, and I agree there's truth to that, but the people who have this model of the world are the ones correctly predicting these things. I did not support Trump because I predicted this happening during a time it was very unpopular to make that prediction an ran contrary to what Trump/Vance campaigned on, and I'm honestly sad to be right but not surprised.
SecureSignals
2d ago
The word 'seems' is doing all the work here.
"Seems" was tongue-in cheek mirroring of the comment I was responding to. The means, motives, and opportunities are clear as fucking day, and people attributing it to motives like "spoiled heir" are just obviously wrong. It was a sarcastic qualification to avoid the banhammer for building consensus, but to avoid ambiguity: it doesn't seem that way, it is obviously what is happening and I don't think rational people have any more leeway to attribute other explanations like "bored, spoiled heir" at this point.
SecureSignals
4d ago
Oh yeah and the Ellison's getting TikTok algo was also just a "fuck you" to PRC, nothing to do with the stated motives pushed by the Jewish lobby for forcing the TikTok divestment. Bored billionaires, burning cash because they are spoiled heirs, just sending "fuck yous", Weiss's pro-Israel allegiance and steering of the network is just incidental- none of those explanations are plausible given this pattern of facts.
Why did Netanyahu support the sale of TikTok and acquisition of the algo by Ellison? To send a "fuck you" to China?
It actually doesn't seem like that at all, it literally seems like Israeli agents acquiring property to make sure American Media is pro-Israel and pro-Jewish. You can't say "oh they just want to waste their money on clout" to explain Bari Weiss being installed at CBS New, or the political sequence of events that led TikTok algorithm into falling in the lap of Ellison (hundreds of Jewish lobbies lobby for the TikTok ban because TikTok is antisemitic, then the ban happens and Ellison gets the algorithm, that's not "bored billionaires")- which Netanyahu directly identified as the most important development in Israel's eighth-front war. That's not "bored billionaires trying to buy everything" it's something else.
ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt was heard on leaked call demanding something must be done about TikTok due to declining support for Israel among young people, hundreds of Jewish organizations throw their weight behind a Tik Tok ban, a week ago Time publishes in article by Anthony Goldbloom titled Why TikTok Needs to be Sold or Banned Before the 2024 Election which hardly mentions anything about some national security threat from CCP, and instead under the heading "Why it Matters" complains about the portion of pro-Palestinian hashtags on the platform and the spread of antisemitism...
TikTok says users decide whether to post and engage with content on #FreePalestine rather than #StandWithIsrael. But, content moderation decides what posts stay up, what gets taken down, and what accounts get banned from the platform. And it’s TikTok’s algorithm that decides what circulates and what doesn’t.
For anyone who doubts the causal link between TikTok and the rise in antisemitic incidents we’ve seen on U.S. campuses: a November 2023 study conducted by Generation Lab, which I helped to organize, showed that people who spend 30 minutes per day on TikTok are 17% more likely to agree with anti-semitic statements like "Jewish people chase money more than other people do."
They want control over the moderation and algo, as ADL has control over the moderation of Reddit and nearly every platform except X only since Musk's takeover.
Netflix ditches deal for Warner Bros. Discovery after Paramount’s offer is deemed superior
In a development that was predicted by many, Paramount Skydance owned by the Ellison family has derailed the Netflix acquisition of Warner Bros and will acquire the company.
The Ellison family are close, long-time personal friends and business partners with Netanyahu. For example, in 2020 Haaretz reported that Ellison intervened to secure a lawyer to represent Netanyahu in his corruption case. In 2021 Larry Ellison offered Netanyahu a paid role on Oracle’s board. Larry Ellison has widely been described as the largest private donor to the IDF.
With Paramount Skydance now poised to acquire Warner Bros, here is an incomplete list of the properties that now have or will shortly come under ownership of the Ellison Family.
August 2025- Hostile takeover of Paramount:
- Paramount Pictures
- Paramount Television
- CBS
- CBS News
- CBS Sports
- Nickelodeon
- MTV
- BET
- Comedy Central
- Showtime
- Paramount+
We saw the immediate fallout from the Ellison family acquisition of CBS News with the installation of Bari Weiss to lead the editorial direction of the company.
Only last month in January 2036 the TikTok algorithm came under the ownership and control of Ellison-owned Oracle, so for practical purposes TikTok should be added to this list:
- TikTok
Now with the impending takeover by Paramount of Warner Bros, these properties will come under the control of the Ellison family:
- Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group
- CNN / CNN International
- HBO / HBO Max
- Discovery+
- Discovery Channel
- DC/DC Studios
- TLC
- TNT
- TBS
- Turner Classic Movies (TCM)
- Animal Planet
- Science Channel
- Travel Channel
- American Heroes Channel (formerly the Military Channel)
- Cartoon Network / AdultSwim
This is the consolidation of American Media under the Ellison family in just sixth months.
Netanyahu has described International Media as the "eighth front" of Israel's wars, it is wildly intolerable to me that the Trump Administration would permit the consolidation of this breadth of news media into a family with foreign loyalties and foreign ties. The reforms at CBS News and elevation of Bari Weiss also prove a political motive and intent to fight this Eighth Front defined by Netanyahu, which is a front Israel is fighting against the minds of the American People.
At what point do "conspiracies" stop becoming conspiracies and start just becoming recognized as plain reality? All the "conspiracy theorists" predicted from the beginning the TikTok algorithm would be handed to an apparatus loyal to Israel, and that Paramount Skydance would not allow Netflix to win Warner Bros, because they are fighting a geopolitical war and not optimizing dollars and cents.
All of this while the United States mobilizes to fight another war for Israel... but deporting Somalis from Minnesota is just impossible we are told.
There's enough symbolism involving wine in the Old Testament, like with Melchizedek, the fact that other surrounding pantheons had gods of wine isn't surprising.
They had a god of wine who took human form and visits Thebes claiming to be the son of Zeus, performs miracles, but is rejected by the King who is then torn asunder for denial of the son's divinity.
The NT has a god who takes human form, turns water into wine, visits Jerusalem claiming to be son of Yahweh, gets rejected by the pharisees, and the divine punishment of the pharisees is prophesized in the parables. It's more than an incidental similarity.
In the Bacchae Dionysus escapes prison through a divinely summoned earthquake, in Acts Paul and Silas escape prison from a divinely summoned earthquake, and Jesus's resurrection is associated with a divine earthquake in which Jesus escapes from his tomb.
Ancient Dionysian rites entailed followers consuming the essence of their god:
The wine they drank was for them potent with divine power--it was the god himself, and the very quintessence of divine life was resident in the juice of the grape. This the devotees of Bacchus knew as a matter of personal experience when, after drinking the wine, they felt a strange new life within themselves. That was the life and power of their god. Their enthusiasm was quite literally a matter of having the god within themselves, of being full of and completely possessed by the god. So they themselves described it in their own language (entheos, enthusiasm). They might be intoxicated; but they felt themselves possessed by the god. The drinking of wine in the service of Dionysus was for them a religious sacrament... So Euripides could say that he who knows the Dionysian mysteries "is pure in life, and revelling on the mountains, has the Bacchic communion in his soul."
The devotees of Dionysus had other realistic means of attaining to communion with their god. They had a sacrament of eating as well as a sacrament of drinking. This rite was the "feast of raw flesh." To be an initiate into the mysteries of Dionysus one must be able to avow... "I have .... Fulfilled his red and bleeding feasts."
I assume Jesus was more familiar with Isaiah than Dionysus in his earthly life.
The entire NT was originally written in Greek, I would assume the writers were familiar with myths from the Greek Dionysia.
Acts 4:12 says that there is no salvation except through Jesus. In Genesis God tells Abraham that He has made him "a father of many nations." Gentiles are also children of Abraham.
Esau was a child of Abraham, and his divine inheritance was swindled by Jacob. The early Rabbis associated the descendants of Esau with the nation of Rome.
SecureSignals
7d ago
I wouldn't say Vatican II muddied the waters as much as it did establish dual path to salvation, not providing any logical justification other than "it's a divine mystery why the Jews are saved in spite of Jesus's words." And many Catholics are simply in denial of the new Church doctrine.
SecureSignals
7d ago
Jesus's parable of the rejection of the son of god is playing on preexisting themes from ancient Greek theater. Here is wikipedia's summary of Euripides The Bacchae (405 BC):
The tragedy recounts the Greek myth of King Pentheus of Thebes and his mother Agave, who were punished by the god Dionysus (who is Pentheus's cousin) for rejecting his cult. The play opens with Dionysus proclaiming that he has arrived in Thebes with his votaries to avenge the slander, repeated by his aunts, that he is not the son of Zeus. Disguised as a foreign holy man, the god intends to introduce Dionysian rites into the city, but the Thebans reject his divinity and king Pentheus orders his arrest.
Eventually, Dionysus drives Pentheus insane, luring him to the mountains. The play ends with the women of Thebes, driven by Dionysus's orgiastic frenzy, tearing Pentheus apart, while his mother Agave bears his head on a thyrsus to her father Cadmus
So the son of Zeus appears as man as a character in the play, tries to introduce Dionysian rites into the city, gets his divinity rejected by the local elite, the elite get slaughtered by intoxicated female cult-followers. Dionysus was the god of wine, and Jesus's first miracle is turning water into wine.
Jesus said He came to fulfill the law. When something is fulfilled, is it still happening or is it over?
Two months ago, Israel hosted an "army" of 1,000 pastors to "Support Israel, Combat Antisemitism". CBN News provided some coverage/summary in a short 4 minute video.
The Christian Broadcasting Network was founded by Pat Roberson, and their channel has 2.7 million subscribers.
The whole video is worth a watch, because if you watch the video you will see the core theme, the message being sent to the pastors, is that God does not renege on his promises. Esoterically that sends the signals to the pastors that they owe their allegiance to Israel. But the CBN anchor also emphasizes that as a takeaway in his short monologue summary of the "lessons" from this summit:
God keeps his covenant, and as Christians we need to recognize that the covenant with Abraham and Moses continues on to this day. He does not change, he is the Lord, he changes not. When he promises something, when he makes a covenant, he fully intends to keep it until that day. Now as a Christian I really enjoy the New Covenant, it was a covenant that was made with the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, but I have to recognize Christianity is a Jewish religion and Jesus was Jewish, and the New Testament was predominantly written by Jews who came to realize that Jesus was the Messiah.
... Paul states plainly that all Israel will be saved. Why? Because God keeps his promise.
Although the emphasis is distinctly evangelical, the actual message is consistent with Catholic Doctrine as well.
The New Law did not abolish the old covenants, it was a practical set of compromises to enable the diffusion of Christianity created by Paul, not Jesus.
SecureSignals
7d ago
Different people different circumstances. IIRC it was Paul who even said that Christians could eat meat that was sacrificed as a pagan offering. I'm pretty sure my auntie would have a heart attack if I served her steak from a cow that was sacrificed to Jupiter, but there was a practical motivation for this new set of rules, which came from Paul and not Jesus (Paul never met Jesus, except in a vision).
The New Law was an optimization for cultural diffusion of Christianity in Pagan Rome, and the rules provide enough leeway to have made it happen. Paul made Christianity as much as Jesus.
SecureSignals
8d ago
Which branch of Christianity professes this? Not Catholicism, certainly not Protestantism. They believe the NT extended salvation, not that the nation of Israel was abolished or that the Gentiles are now among the nation of Israel.
Even if some Christian believes that, just imaging the cognitive dissonance: "I don't like or support Israel because they are claiming to be Israel but are not, I am Israel now, I am the real Jew- not Netanyahu." Even if you believed that, you are just operating in this little universe that shrouds your perception of what is going on here.
In Genesis God promises Abraham, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse".
Both Huckabee and Carlson believe Yahweh made this promise, but only Christian Zionists take this seriously. How could you believe in the bible and not take that seriously? Carlson says "Oh I, uh, don't curse Israel because Gold told me not too, I just don't think Netanyahu is a real Jew or Israel is the Israel mentioned by God." He is pigeon-holed into this anti-semitic canards that don't get to the truth of it: that is hostile foreign propaganda-myth, it's not true. Don't believe it, because if you believe it you are being manipulated into doing someone else's bidding for their own benefit and not yours. Huckabee and Ted Cruz believe it, Carlson believes it but he just suffers cognitive dissonance trying to square it with his own newfound antisemitism.
SecureSignals
8d ago
Ethnography and theology are two sides of the same coin, as are myth and ethnogenesis. They are tokens that influence the genetic evolution of the tribe.
Are you really saying that ancient Jews did not believe in the literal existence of God
Yes the vast majority of them did believe the stories, but the ones creating the stories had political motives. There is a distinction to be made between believing the myths and believing the myths. Does Netanyahu literally believe them? Or does he believe in them insofar as he identifies with them and uses them to organize a people to attain geopolitical objectives? It doesn't really matter what Netanyahu believes, he is a product of those myths and he is using them to change the world, and those same myths are indispensable in ensuring the loyalty of foreigners like Huckabee and Ted Cruz: people who are supposed to represent me by the way, but they do not- the bible tells them to be loyal to Israel it doesn't tell them to be loyal to me and mine.
You are making a pretty weird claim here, and one that doesn't seem necessary to the rest of your point at all
It is necessary for my point, because people just dismiss Huckabee as being some outlier that provides an incidental justification for a "straw man", rather than Huckabee's loyalty to Israel being a feature, not a bug of Christianity. And Carlson's opposition, also rooted in Christianity, is forced to accept the same fictional truths Huckabee uses to justify his perspective. How can Christians debate this if they agree God promised them the land?
SecureSignals
8d ago
The Old Law: if you don't properly worship Yahweh (symbolically representative of Jews) you are cursed. And if you do properly worship Yahweh (Jews) you will be blessed. I can hear my own political representatives restate that framework to curse their own race and nation for turning against Israel.
SecureSignals
8d ago
Christians claim thew New Law represents the "completion" of the Old Law. But no branch of Christianity claims the New Law supplanted the Mosaic covenant. Jesus himself said he did not come to abolish the law, and Christian doctrine is that the First Covenant is living and they are outside of it.
The New Law actually was a practical mechanism for bringing Gentiles in the fold of Yahweh. Conversion would be quite difficult if you demanded they get circumcised and are unable to eat their traditional diet or at the tables of their pagan neighbors. It was Paul's innovation of the New Law that allowed Christianity to flourish.
But Christians believe in the Mosaic Covenant and the Abrahamic covenant. Huckabee is the one that treats these seriously, Carlson is the one that doesn't present a coherent position rooted in the bible and instead just balks.
SecureSignals
8d ago
And how exactly is Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz droning on about "Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed" contrary to Leviticus?
The 26th chapter of Leviticus is laying out the same framework for the Mosaic Covenant, which is a genetically-inherited blood covenant between the Jews and Yahweh. I am not aware of any Christian sect that claims this covenant does not or no longer exists- I've seen anti-Semitic Catholics claim that Jesus broke the Mosaic covenant, but that's contrary to their own Church teachings.
The Mosaic covenant is one of the most stark "main characters of history" assertions in the body of human mythological canon, and it's remarkable that billions of non-Jews hold it as true. That has real-world consequences, like when we are faced with actual life and death geopolitical standoff we have two Christians debating Genesis.
You even undersell the depth of Jonathan Pollard's betrayal, who was one of the most damaging spies in US history. Pollard's professed motive was that he believed the US wasn't doing enough for Israel. Huckabee meeting with Pollard is a feature not a bug, as Huckabee's worship of Jews is the fundamental job requirement for his US government position.
The most unfortunate part is that what you call the "strawman" of Christian Zionism is actually the only internally coherent position a Christian can hold... like, don't you believe the Bible is divinely and literally true? It's a fatal flaw in the Christian blockchain that the Torah really does reduce to race worship of Jews symbolically represented by their tribal god Yahweh, like Zeus was a tribal god representing the European tribes worshipped by him. I don't see how you could believe the Old Testament and also not agree with Huckabee's perspective.
I understand where HUCKABEE is coming from, it's Tucker Carlson who pussyfoots without saying what he actually means. Is Carlson saying that Yahweh did not promise the land to the Jews? Or is he saying that Yahweh did, but for diplomatic reasons we shouldn't acknowledge it? Why doesn't Carlson then just say "I agree with you but we shouldn't say it out loud because it's not politically expedient", why act shocked if he believes it as well? The best I can infer is that Carlson is saying Yahweh did promise the land to the Jews but the Israelis are not Jews- although he does not say that directly, he makes the argument indirectly by saying "Netanyahu came from Europe."
Carlson incessantly says we can't criticize Jews collectively for their collective behavior, but his approach to antisemitism is a critique of literature he himself claims to hold is true.
I grew up Christian, I understand well the dynamics and how going to a Catholic church is not even close to the same as a sermon from Mike Huckabee. But are you really equipped to challenge Huckabee when he clearly has the bible on his side and you believe the bible as well?
The real problem is that your "strawman" of Christian Zionism is internally coherent within Christianity, and it's actually the Christian antisemitism professed by Carlson that's incoherent.
With that said, for all of Carlson's denials that he is antisemitic he has put himself in a very dangerous position, he has put himself squarely in that camp and none of his meager qualifications or groveling "I hate Rome too because they killed Jews, I'm not antisemitic!" is going to work. I don't understand Carlson's motives. He is either Red Pilled and trying to subversively promote anti-semitism or he's just trying to gain market share from the surge in anti-semitism among young audiences. If it's the latter he's going to have a Come to Jesus moment very soon, if it's the former then he's just demonstrating how Christianity is a blocker from properly engaging that tribe.
Yahweh didn't promise anything to the Jews, Yahweh is literary fiction- ancient capeshit, and the bible is Jewish race propaganda. That's a hard pill to swallow as a long time former Christian myself, but watching the "Carlson vs Huckabee dialectic" on the eve of another major war for Israel just shows how the Christian perspective is unable to grapple with the forces we are dealing with, it is captured by the Torah on both the anti-semitic and philo-semitic side of the debate.
SecureSignals
13d ago
Biological evolution is not too slow. The Roman Empire was created in more than two generations and it declined over many generations. Biological evolution inarguably happened during the Black Death. Biological Evolution of what an "American" is is happening in 2 generations.
The most specific is the claim that the change in population after the collapse of Rome was dysgenic
You have that backwards.
Latin warlords conquer Italian Peninsula: "Hard Times" that create good men (From frame A towards B, essentially genetic replacement of Early European Farmers with Indo European colonizers).
Genetic Changes during Imperial Rome: "Good times" that create weak men (From From B to Frame C). Decadence, dysgenic cultural practices enabled by prosperity: fertility decline, population replacement, decay of noble status and lineage. Huge genetic shift in the population.
Late Antiquity: "Weak mean create hard times" - From Frame C to D and onwards, imperial Rome collapsing and being genetically cleansed by the barbarians.
Medieval and Early Modern: "Hard times create good men": Genetic changes from Imperial Rome are reversed, genetic foundation for the next phases of European culture.
So we have two theories:
I'm sure all those visits by Netanyahu to the oval Office were Netanyahu taking Trump's orders for staying on the warpath (despite media reports that the opposite was the case).
Notably Trump qualifies his belief that Iran was going to attack first as his "opinion", because US intelligence has confirmed that they were not going to attack first.
Senator Warner, a top member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and "Gang of Eight" had this to say about Trump's opinion:
Warner is only wrong that we are in uncharted territory, we are in the territory that brought us to Iraq twice and now here, only instead of platitudes and debates and lies about Hussein-9/11-Al Qaeda connections, existing WMDs, babies being ripped from their incubators in Kuwait, Spreading Democracy, they don't even feel the need to lie to us anymore with high ideals or fabricated intelligence.
So I guess "Iran was going to attack first" is the narrative they are going to go with, but they don't even have any fabricated intelligence or false flag or anything. IC says that is false, and Trump just says it was his opinion.
More options
Context Copy link