SkoomaDentist
The Greater Finnish Empire
No bio...
User ID: 84
Whoosh... (see also and from 1:10 onwards)
Do you use commercial models/implementations or do you have a recommendation where to start if I want to set it up myself?
For photo noise reduction I've used Lightroom and (free but specific to Olympus / OM cameras) OM Workspace. I don't think there are good open source models as the models are camera specific due to different sensor and bayer filter characteristics (and why they can produce really impressive results - check the OM-1 original vs denoised comparison here where the original is far from what I'd consider usable while the Lightroom one is perfectly fine).
For audio stem separation Ultimate Vocal Remove is my tool of choice (you can download the models from the settings page). I start by removing vocals with MDX-Net / Kim Vocal 2, take the residual and remove drums with Demucs and then possibly remove the bass from the residual of that. Be aware that if you just split the stems from the original they will not sum to 100% and thus you want to go the recursive route. I'm sure there are some newer models that you can install manually but I haven't used those as the existing ones work well enough for my purpose (removing distracting vocals or emphasizing instrumental part to better hear what's happening).
Also extremely impressive considering it predates any non-research AI models by at least half a decade or more.
LLMs and other generation AIs are much more HW intensive than domain specific neural networks. 500M - 1B parameters is plenty when the model doesn't have to understand instructions or global context (hell, there are some task specific audio models in wide use that can fit in just a couple of megabytes while performing well). Sure, a more powerful gpu will run the models faster but when you're doing noise reduction on a dozen culled and selected photos it doesn't really matter if it takes 15 seconds or a minute to run the process when on cpu it would take half an hour. Likewise stem separation taking a few minutes is a non-issue when you only need to run it once or at most a few times for a song (such as when remixing or isolating instruments for practising the lines).
There are apps that can run in the cloud but they're (expensive) subscription or credit based and having to pay $30-$50 per month per app gets really expensive. Not to mention they tend to have ridiculous censorship (think photos of people on a beach where you want to remove some distractions and the cloud version complains that your content breaks the terms of use).
I'm a firm believer that nothing important has happened in the PC space for the last 15 years
There is one exception to this: A gpu that can run local AI models. Not LLMs or image generators but the sorts of custom neural networks that have become quite common for eg. photo noise reduction, audio stem separation etc. In those cases even a fairly low end "good gpu" will do fine (such as this ancient NVidia Quadro P2000 Mobile aka Gefore GTX 1050) but the difference between "have" and "have not" is massive.
Office documents and PDFs, along with even many browser tabs, are definitely a solid set of real-world work computer requirements, but they're also not that demanding.
A better way to think about it is that web pages and apps are ridiculously ineffective while Office and PDF viewers are if not optimized, at least not 1000x pessimized by design simply due to having decades long history, no time for rewrite from the ground up in "modern" languages and generally the core is written by people who have at least some idea what they're doing.
A general rule of thumb I've found is that it's flat out impossible to have too much disk space if you use the computer for any sort of entertainment or hobby stuff beyond web browsing and the right amount of RAM is to take your initial estimate and double it. Hence me using this 2018 model laptop for C++ development, photo editing, running AI audio tools etc without problems because I made sure to upgrade to 64 GB ram and many TBs of SSD storage.
'Man wakes up in 2040, tells his friend "I want to fuck a toaster". The friend replies "You know you can just order a sexbot, right? I really don't want to know about the details."'
You just told me that it's not common for Mormon ladies to have massive mammaries. That is the biggest downsell you could hand me
That is just because you're a heretical unbeliever who is doomed to eternity in hell...
Unlike those of us who are righteous unbelievers because we can appreciate the beauty of smaller breasts.
Our feeds must be very different.
Probably, as I have zero interest in American media or general purpose forums, what with living in Finland and all that. It is possible that the American media is sensationalist but The Motte is an international forum so a generic "why do people care" is going to be taken as "why do people everywhere (in the west at least) care" to which the answer is "actually they mostly don't seem to care".
This is the latest news here about the virus (article is in Finnish and text copy pasted here in case paywall goes up - you'll need to use google translate or something). It seems to have a very "This is very interesting but it doesn't have any effect on us" sort of approach to me.
On Meddit everyone seems aware of all the pieces
FWIW, that has been the approach of the Finnish media. "This is very unusual and a deadly outbreak but there is no reason for concern as human to human transmission is very inefficient and thus risk of any sort of pandemic is very low".
Basically the same as if there was an Ebola outbreak on a cruise ship. That'd be newsworthy and reason for cautioning travelers who may have interacted with people from that ship but otherwise just "stuff happens abroad, evening news as usual".
I also don't know why.
Imagine there was an Ebola outbreak on a cruise ship. That would obviously also be story even though there is no risk of global pandemic or spread in western countries.
A deadly virus (in the very literal sense) outbreak in such situation is always newsworthy even though there is little risk of it spreading further.
Why do people care so much about the hantavirus outbreak?
They do?
I’ve seen more denials here on The Motte than I have seen any actual caring about the outbreak in the news or other forums. Obviously an outbreak of such virus on a cruise ship is newsworthy so there have been a few articles in local papers about it and one about two locals who were exposed on an airplane but that’s it. No alarmism whatsoever because hantaviruses just don’t transmit between humans well (or at all depending on the specific virus).
I think there is more demand for alarmism (that can then be used to point how ”the establishment” is overreacting) here on The Motte than there is any actual alarmism in the news or from officials.
What part do you not believe?
That hantaviruses are found all over the world? That there are around 100000 cases per year? That this strain spreads between humans? That the spread is not particularly effective?
In other words, they try pretty hard.
I don't think they do. They certainly could but frankly their recommendation algorithms have always been utter garbage and they've gone out of their way to make it impossible for users to even manually help them. For example I can't say "Never recommend this artist for this playlist" nor can I say "Never recommend this album or song for anything (but do recommend other songs from this artist)". Their recommendations to playlists keep repeating the same small number of songs over and over and can't even distinguish multiple identical versions (so a playlist that has song X from the original album will get recommendations for song X from a compilation album).
This runs in parallel with them having a massive team to work on the Spotify client with the result that it has only degraded with time since people need to justfify their existence while the real development needs could be filled by just a couple of small teams.
It's pronounced "shitter" for a reason.
I don't have any numbers but there's probably a reason you don't hear anything about similar utter devastation that's common in North American natives and Australian Aboriginals communities.
AFAIK more or less every human farming civilization has developed alcohol so most of the people in those who were at very high risk of alcohol dependency simply died off centuries or millenia ago and the rest developed physical and cultural resistance mechanisms.
But what if the zeitgeist is all about how things are not on a good track? The 20th century artists wanted to explicitly wake people up from their slumber, so they don't think that everything is fine. To upset and shake people by the shoulders.
Eh. The fear of nuclear annihilation during cold war was by any sane definition about things not being on a good track but it resulted in a whole bunch of beautiful art (ie. music). See exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and so on.
Art can be intentionally made to wake up people while being both beautiful and popular.
There's one that has definitively met the high bar, which is the terrible disease resistance of Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals due to not having plagues until colonisation
Alcoholism resistance is another obvious one. The rates are just ridiculously higher than for any society that didn't move directly from being hunter gatherers to modern life.
Hantaviruses are found all over the world and not that rare. There are around 100000 cases caused by different Hantaviruses per year globally. What's different is this strain sustaining spread between humans (but not particularly effectively).
You're just really unlucky or surrounded by autists in a particularly woke environment.
I've worked in tech for the last 30 years and personally know of exactly one (1) trans person (and that's not via anything work related). She had obvious autistic tendencies (severe enough to prevent holding a steady job for very long) before transitioning.
Honestly, who gives a shit?
This is a ridiculous flogged to death hobby horse some Americans insist on sticking to. Clinton had bad taste in women? So fucking what? That's completely and utterly irrelevant to literally anything at all other than keeping up juvenile kindergarten level "Clinton is a poohead"-rhetoric that mostly just tells how the complainer doesn't know when to give up when they have no actual criticism left.
Hugo Weaving and Liv Tyler are just bad - the films in general just cannot do elves
Liv Tyler / Arwen simply shouldn't have been featured in the films beyond perhaps one short scene in Rivendell and another at the end. Expanding that role was a prominent example of how the film series was completely needlessly hollywoodized.
My issue with the Hobbit trilogy is that it is abundantly clear that the studio wanted more LotR movies but the Hobbit is a very different work from Lord of the Rings in both tone and content.
Much of the WTF-ness of the Hobbit trilogy is explained by Del Toro noping out less than a year before the shooting started with the result that Jackson didn't have the preproduction or script finalized by the start date and the problems only got worse for the second and third installments with Jackson essentially having to go "Fuck this, let's just shoot something and hope we can edit it to something coherent".
- Prev
- Next

Agreed. What most frustrates me about Covid talk on The Motte is the insistence that there were only ever two situations in the western countries: a full lockdown or the Swedish "let's do nothing"-approach. As if my country (you know, right next door to Sweden) with zero legally mandated "lockdowns" but a bunch of voluntary recommendations and public health response changes didn't exist.
I kept track of restrictions during the Covid era and the only government mandated ones were restrictions to large events, bars, restaurants and gyms. Everything else was voluntary (including bar / restaurant closures when the pandemic started) or just recommendations with no penalties. The officials outright recommended that "going out in the nature is a very good idea now".
More options
Context Copy link