@Skulldrinker's banner p

Skulldrinker


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 November 16 18:09:10 UTC

				

User ID: 1874

Skulldrinker


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 November 16 18:09:10 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1874

Then the two of you together should get a larger apartment in that same city.

General rule; never move for a girl. You'll uproot yourself and your functional social status will be reduced, the girl will mysteriously find you less attractive and dump your ass. Maybe it's (slightly) safe(er) if you're both moving together and already married.

The career thing smells. I also don't quite get the flat-out refusal to drive.

I remember that, I just also remember the vibes coming from normie sources, or as normie as anything on the 2010 internet could be.

I associate Elevatorgate more with the rise of prominent "geek girls" that didn't seem to like geeks or geeky things.

Thank you, but I have to say, that second link does not sound like an actual woman, more like a dude making a point.

This is frankly Wellness-Wednesday adjacent.

Does anyone else remember when the internet was full of Women (capitalization intentional) complaining that men hit on them? My perception as a guy in the early 2010s was that the list of places/contexts where you weren't "allowed" to speak to a woman was growing every day. It started with the gym/bus/grocery store, but then came to encompass every possible social context where men and women might come into contact with eachother. It reached a point where I was expecting to see an article titled "We Need To Talk About The Serious Problem of Women being Flirted With at Singles Events."

It's just that, now in the current year, I can't seem to actually find any solid examples; aren't all these important feminist essays archived somewhere? I remember them being inescapable.

Here's a pithy summary: When I hear women complaining that men don't approach them in public anymore, I want to link a 2010s feminism article and say "This is why." But...where are the articles? Did I imagine them?

It stops being holy if it becomes an LLM-ism. Same with it's not X, it's Y.

The AI is doing us a favor by finding all the vapid, say-something-without-saying-anything phrases in writing and making them feel icky.

cost is just... chef's kiss

AI slop detected.

She's also zero-covid.

•Its important to go out there and DO SOMETHING

•Rich people are just different from you and me. They're all evil. So are white people, apart from the ones who are Allies

•[middle class people are struggling and need help so long as they're the right color]

•[poor people are good so long as they're the right color]

•Chuh, learn to code, boomer. Sucks to suck, women and queer PoCs are the future, your time has passed, something something mediocre white man

•We live in a fascist white supremacy where klansmen lurk around every corner plotting to lynch [TV actors], but also we are on the right side of history and our time is now and a people's revolution is right around the corner once we all unite behind revolutionary leaders like Hasan Piker, comrade.

• [disagreement is treason] I'm not going to bother with this one.

•White supremacist Nazi racist misogynist gatekeeping chuds are dog-whistling about their conspiracy to keep trans women of color from playing video games.

My point is, a lot of those things are just universal tactics to rile people up and bully your way into relevance.

I'd gladly accept a pile of crypto and give you whatever reimbursement doesn't cause you tax concerns.