The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
No bio...
User ID: 174
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
3d ago
The problem is you're arguing against a real-life Pascal's Wager, or at least Pascal's Mugging. If you're the kind of parent who wants to buck CPS so your kids can have a better life, the cost of having your kids taken away from you is extremely high. The cost of having to stop doing it (that is, comply with "reasonable requests to stop") under (individual, not general) threat of having the kids taken away is also high. If you want good parents to find it reasonable to parent their own kids less strictly, then the chance of that has to be infinitesimal, not merely a few percent or tenths of a percent.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
3d ago
Waitress is a mostly female job in the US, but they aren't selected for attractiveness.
Depends on where you go. It's no coincidence there aren't any fat ugly waitresses at good restaurants. (Nor fat ugly waiters) They're not solely selected for attractiveness, but they're definitely selected for it.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
3d ago
In the better Red Tribe schools, of course. In Blue Tribe schools, maybe but not because of anything they learned in schools (maybe videogames). In underclass schools, oh yes, definitely, it's of practical importance.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
3d ago
It's kinda connected. The particular regulation isn't, but the practice that ultimately developed that having and enforcing a policy of removing disruptive people who are minority members would result in painful legal action whereas just letting shit happen wouldn't, was.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
3d ago
Because it didn't really have consequences last time. MLK Jr. spent maybe a few weeks in jail, total, right? Civil disobedience in the US wasn't like in South Africa where they actually imprisoned Mandela for a long time -- it was just a show.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
4d ago
it was only when the real holes in the story became too big to ignore
And that only happened because a cranky old white guy at the Washington Post was willing to call BS.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
4d ago
You know who WAS able to produce the dress? Monica Lewinsky.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
4d ago
The statute of limitations has run.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
4d ago
The fact that the Supreme Court can lay down very clear precedent and lower courts are free to plug their ears and say "lalala I can't hear you" is bordering on a constitutional crisis.
It's only a crisis if the Supreme Court does not yield, and they have.
It just means the Second Amendment has been replaced with the anti-Second Amendment: "None of your other rights apply when guns are involved".
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
I believe the standard darwinian playbook is that you draw the line so it encompasses the cases that support the things you are trying to prove, and does not encompass cases which do not. And the line applies only in the instant discussion and not to any other discussions involving the same evidence.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
I describe our current situation as a K-selection spiral. We put a lot of effort into protect and raising each individual child, which results in fewer children. Fewer children results in making each child more precious, and thus demanding of more effort to protect and raise, etc.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
Does such a person exist in reality, or is this a hypothetical?
Caster Semanya comes close, but does not have ovaries. I'm not aware of an 46,XY DSD condition which results in ovary development -- all I know of result in either testes (as with 5-alpha reductase deficiency, which Semanya has) or non-functional undifferentiated gonads.
Doesn't matter, though; those are intersex conditions, and are rare enough to simply be taken as exceptional cases. That there are a few edge cases that blur the lines doesn't mean the lines don't exist.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
And Roddenberry was definitely doing '60s Cold War analogies.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
Personally I offer nothing. But there are alternatives to the Calvinist ideal that one should be suffering all the time; hedonism and epicureanism are diametrically opposed, for instance.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
It's fairly easy to find references in Google Books both ways in the first half of the 20th century, though the only non-fictional contemporary one with an opinion I find asserts that blue is for boys and pink is for girls. This is post-Victorian (and American, besides).
I find nothing from the Victorian era, the only thing I find before the 20th century is this 1833 work, which also asserts that "pink is for girls".
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
5d ago
I'm surprised by the photo. Acid attack to me would indicate foreign Muslim (some form of brown), not probably-domestic black.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
6d ago
They've discovered it loses votes so they're keeping it under their hat until they're back in power, at which point trans-everything is back on the agenda.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
6d ago
LOL, this is like on Star Trek when they presented Nomad with an irresolvable paradox, except instead of making him get a higher-pitched voice and explode, it made him quote Ronald Reagan.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
6d ago
Turns out you can do the chart in FREDs interface. Here's median mortgage payment for a house bought in a given year as a percentage of income, assuming a median-rate 30-year mortgage. Very different look!
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
6d ago
From my perspective, having kids is the most sure way to ensure some decent and adequate standard of care in my twilight years.
Might want to ask King Lear about that one.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
6d ago
On the one hand, it really was about women entering into a "boys' club" space, not ethics in gaming journalism.
No, it never was.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
7d ago
"Suffering is the only part of life" is what you're offering.
The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
7d ago
· Edited 7d ago
The second chart appears to be comparing nominal mortgage payments to real incomes. That is, I can reproduce it by using the mortgage payments from the first table (which are clearly nominal, showing $2207 in 2024 and $141 in 1971) and the incomes in the second table (which are in 2023 dollars, as can be verified by looking on FRED)
If you properly use nominal incomes (from FRED) it looks a lot different.
Sure, but they were segregationists; it wasn't about crime.
More options
Context Copy link