The_Nybbler
If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.
No bio...
User ID: 174
Yes, HP is left wing and yes Voldemort was Nazi-inspired; of course he was, that's the modern incarnation of evil. But Harry himself wasn't particularly lefty, he was mostly interested in solving his personal problem with Voldemort. The left-wing paragon role was left to Hermione. How to do a right-wing version of the story would depend on what "right wing" you want. An American 'gun nut' right wing wouldn't actually be so far from canon, except for the major changes that you'd have to have Dumbledore be an outsider, and throw Hermione out on her ear. Traditional European blood-and-soil would be difficult to do without replacing half-blood Harry, of course; perhaps Neville Longbottom could be the hero.
RW Potter fanfic is like Voldemort winning.
No, Voldemort was a degenerate obsessed with his own personal immortality; he was just using the mudblood stuff to get support (though when he was just half-blood Tom Riddle he believed it)
Yeah, I don't think anyone's making a real story here. Although if you're a Death Eater trying to foil (or turn!) Harry Potter, a cutie Slytherin honeytrap would have been a better way to go than anything the canon Slytherins came up with.
You absolutely can have open borders, a welfare state for citizens, and a functional economy.
This, however, is not a political possibility in the United States either.
The best exponent was some nice number because those are easier for humans to develop proofs for.
Democratic control of the press means whatever is worst for the Republicans will be front and center of the voter's minds. And the fifth column among the base supposedly mad that Trump didn't deport 100 million people (that is, Fuentes) doesn't help.
I expect a blowout in favor of the Democrats.
And tri-Delt in particular does.
"Society" is not looking for any alternative ethical model. It has the one it wants (men bad women good), it just fears to say it openly.
Ghomeshi
Ah, the case where the text messages indicated the women were co-ordinating their stories. Same case which involved a Volkswagen Beetle called the "Love Bug", which unfortunately for our brave accusers, Ghomeshi didn't actually own at the time of the events he was accused of.
Explanation A (uncharitable): There was no rape
Explanation B (charitable): There was in fact rape
Explanation A is uncharitable to Jane Doe but charitable to the accused. Explanation B is charitable to Doe but uncharitable to the accused. Charity provides no answers here, only a political preference for one sex or the other does.
Can you put yourself in a headspace where A and B are literally the same scenario?
No. Rashomon is misleading; there is an objective truth and objective reality, even if inaccessible.
We are not at war with Russia. We are at war with Iran, but not Russia.
We live in a majority Democratic country. A small number of those Democrats will vote Republican when the Democrats are in power and screwing everything up by the numbers. A large number of Republicans will vote Democratic if Republicans are in power and screwing up any one thing. So I expect a Democratic landslide, Blue Texas and all.
There's also the US invasion of Grenada, which was not bloodless, but nor was it gruesome. Same with Panama.
Presumably they got scared of the mob and turned around.
Not the mob, but the juggernaut of state force behind them. Confrontations between left-wing mobs and right-wing defenders lead not only to injury but charges for the right-wing side. Even when the principal himself defended himself in a mild way, he was arrested.
The analogy with Christianity pretty much falls apart with prostitutes; as far as I know Jesus forgave them but expected them to stop being prostitutes. But on another level the whole thing fails because it was right to be worried about Christianity; it led not only to wars and upheaval but ultimately the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Crusades, Islam, and wokeness.
Probably they'll invite Mattress Girl to be on the jury.
All that has to happen is Letitia James has to find a friendly judge who will throw out all the exculpatory evidence and/or ignore the law and rule that voluntary intoxication negates consent. She's likely got a rolodex full of such.
"This person we're crushing isn't actually heroic for bucking us because he had no reason to believe we'd crush him" really isn't a great argument.
Jack Smith is the special prosecutor who went after Trump for the Mar a Lago case and a January 6 case. The first was dismissed by Trump appointee Aileen Cannon who said (with some backing from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas) his office was illegal. The second was actually dismissed by an Obama appointee after Trump won the 2024 election.
There's also a Gauss rifle in Fallout, and a Gauss cannon in Doom.
The words "freesia" and "verbena" are the common names of flowering plants. I wouldn't say 'yakuza' (a member of a particular Japanese crime organization, or collectively the name for the organization) is a technical term either. I'm not sure "doula" qualifies either.
Like, how the hell do they expect regular and/or awkward guys to learn this stuff?
"No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to die"
That is, they don't, they just want regular/awkward guys to disappear and never bother them. Preferably doing something out of sight that helps them in some way, but the "out of sight" is the important part.
The broken window fallacy says there's a benefit to the broken window. The argument here is that the detriment is less than you get with just by counting the price paid for the window, which is true -- the glazier does indeed benefit, even though the net effect is loss.
And when the Democrats win the midterms and invoke War Powers Resolution law because Americans don’t want this to go on indefinitely… what then?
Trump vetoes.

The reasoning in the second paragraph should cast doubt on the first. It's not going to be a spectacle. It's going to be a video of a guy in a wheelchair, restrained, hooded, and with a target placed on his heart, who is then shot to death by several people. It will be brutal, but it won't be a spectacle. And I think Hegseth knows this.
I don't know why he wants it publicly streamed. But I think it's a good thing. Whether you're for or against the death penalty, you should be able to see what it is.
More options
Context Copy link