@The_Nybbler's banner p

The_Nybbler

If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.

8 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 21:42:16 UTC

				

User ID: 174

The_Nybbler

If you win the rat race you're still a rat. But you're also still a winner.

8 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 21:42:16 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 174

The DSA is not going to be a third national party; it is taking over the Democrats. And with the Democrats it gets the Democratic juggernaut. Policy positions don't matter because the Democratic right flank is secure -- no matter how far left they move, they won't lose people to the Republicans, because it's simply socially unacceptable for people who have gone Democratic to ever vote for Republicans.

Surprised me in both directions, actually; I figured Roberts, like Kavanaugh, would also lean on statutory rather than constitutional claims, and I didn't expect Gorsuch or Thomas to go that way. Although MadMonzer is right here -- Thomas isn't a partisan hack, he has a very solid idea of what the Constitution says even if it ain't right. For instance in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado: "[A]ny statute that forced the President to allow aliens to cross the border against his will would appear to exceed Congress’s enumerated powers, and a court could not enforce it against the President." -- he gets this from the Article II vesting clause, which is a pretty severe stretch. I would expect that Congress gets to decide which aliens get to cross the border, and certainly the law has always worked that way.

At some point European liberals and handwringers need to realize that their generosity is the problem.

I'm fairly sure they know by now. But to them, the problem is not a problem.

That monopoly has enough loopholes to drive FedEx through. The post office suspended the monopoly on "extremely urgent letters" in 1979, and I believe current statutes freeze that suspension.

The DSA win has already flipped Newsom on the wealth tax (he opposed it before, he supports it now); Hakeem Jeffries has already feted them. The Democrats know this is the future of their party.

"Normies" on the Democratic right will never vote for Republicans; it's socially unacceptable to even think about it. The Democrats' right flank is secure, so they can safely move left to keep the highly motivated socialists happy. Strategies aimed at the center don't work for that reason.

You expect people to be informed of something there is literally not enough evidence to judge? The claim that the number of false ballots cast (no, not by ineligible individuals, but by organized groups) is small is disputed. And we know these operations can be hidden from official scrutiny (even if they're so well known they're basically a meme) for a very long time; Chicago was.

Rate cuts wouldn't fuck the economy, unless they zeroed them in the next meeting or something. The Fed doesn't have the fine control it thinks it has, and as far as I can tell the only Fed-related trouble we've had is due to overtightening, not over-loosening.

but that he's been making Argentina-like rhetoric for about a year now and his other actions very much suggest that he might go down the LATAM path.

I don't think the financial community is afraid of Trump acting like Milei.

Assimilation faces the same resistance and is even harder to do against resistance.

Well, to the counting office, but yeah.

From Election Code section 3020

(2) If the ballot has no postmark, a postmark with no date, or an illegible postmark, and no other information is available from the United States Postal Service or the bona fide private mail delivery company to indicate the date on which the ballot was mailed, the vote by mail ballot identification envelope is date stamped by the elections official upon receipt of the vote by mail ballot from the United States Postal Service or a bona fide private mail delivery company, and is signed and dated pursuant to Section 3011 on or before election day.

So if you can get the ballot to the counters as-if it was delivered by the post office or "a bona fide private mail delivery company", you don't need a postmark.

No. The issue is not that Trump would fuck the US economy by dismissing Federal Reserve members. The issue is the financial community would be freaked by the fact that he COULD, and that would fuck the US economy.

Yes, the decision is probably legally correct. But if something isn't done to prevent rampant fraud, our elections are all going to be decided by whoever is best at fraud.

Why wouldn't it be a reasonable search, given that the police in Chatrie had a warrant?

"and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

The question is whether "everything in that area" is particular enough.

California doesn't even require a post-mark, just a hand-written date on the ballot envelope.

Absolutely trivial, it's just an ink stamp.

I think basically Roberts didn't want to scare the hoes. Or rather, the bros. Giving the President that much control over the Fed would upset the financial markets and Roberts never wants to rock the boat that much.

It's not (except as a coinage by the eponymous douchebag music producer), but "quixotic" is, as is "quixotism"; the latter may be meant.

ADOS is a special case and probably not assimilable for the reasons Jefferson pointed out, bolstered by HBD reasons. They will never forgive the original sin as long as they are visibly less successful than whites, and they will always be visible less successful than whites if they aren't receiving continuous bolstering to an extent greater than ever practiced -- and any such bolstering depends on the acceptance by both groups of the relevance of the sin.

Has the formation of ghettos ever turned out well?

Yes, often. The US is full of former ghettos where integration eventually happened; the ghetto provided a place those who could not integrate could survive (but at a disadvantage) while their children and grandchildren integrated.

Watson is pretty terrible; it allows bad actors to keep adding backdated votes after election day until they get the result they want. Vastly increases the ease of such fraud.

I think a pragmatic libertarian would begin to believe that the constitution can’t protect libertarianism.

That's not merely pragmatism, that's empirical fact.

If you give Google the context, it finds Brown fine. Plessy it finds with a single-word search.

duelling arises out of being armed

Formal duelling in the US is basically extinct, despite all the guns. Anything else you might call "duelling" only arises out of being armed if you exclude unarmed mutual combat, in which case your argument is just a tautology.