ZorbaTHut
2d ago
It's theoretically possible it's a bug with a specific browser; what browser are you on?
ZorbaTHut
10d ago
Yeah. I'm very glad I set things up in a way where I could just move the servers easily.
ZorbaTHut
10d ago
There's a bunch of problems here. Yes, China traffic spiked, but it didn't spike that much. Also, now that the analytics have caught up, it spiked a day or two before the server problems began, and everything's back to normal. So . . . was it bots? Eh, maybe, maybe not. And while I can get a long list of IPs, it's not clear that there was any significant pattern within that.
ZorbaTHut
10d ago
If you had an employee whose work you had to check every single time, you'd fire him.
In most of the programming jobs I've been in, code reviews are considered mandatory for all programmers. Everyone's work is checked every single time, and yet we don't all get fired. Humans make mistakes, and we've set up systems to better solve that issue. So do computers pretending to be humans. Nothing out of the ordinary here.
There's a lot of cases where figuring out how to solve a problem is far more complicated than verifying the solution, and those are cases that LLMs are fantastic with.
ZorbaTHut
10d ago
I don't know what you've tried, but:
- Claude is probably the best-integrated system out there; use the commandline tool because it's able to go research your codebase on its own.
- Make it a CLAUDE.md with general architecture. It can make a CLAUDE.md for you with the
/initcommand, but read over it by hand to make sure it's right. - Make sure thinking is enabled (hit "tab"). If you're asking it to do a really hard thing, use the "ultrathink" keyword, which will give it more space to think.
- If you have reference tests to use as a model, point it at those. Telling it something like "read existing tests and use the same general style" can help a lot; if you can be more specific, do so.
- Ask it to run the tests and fix problems.
- Expect the occasional mistake. Review its code.
ZorbaTHut
10d ago
I'm paraphrasing a bit; I ended up with a bunch of prompts, including "write tests to cover every endpoint" and "write tests to increase code coverage" and "stop skipping this specific file, I've seen you consider it six times now and you keep saying it'll be hard and going to do something else, knock it off, go do it for real" and at one point it started just writing tests that verified an endpoint returned a success code instead of actually checking the data and I had to tell it to go back and fix them.
But nevertheless, it was fundamentally "go write a bunch of tests kthx".
What kinds of tests does it write?
Pretty simple ones. In general it's either "call endpoints and verify that the right thing happened in the database", or "change the database and verify that the right thing happened from the endpoint".
How does it know what to expect or assert in the tests?
By reading the code. It's not a black box, it just goes and reads the code. Then it tries stuff.
Then if the stuff didn't work, it reads the error messages and fixes it.
Same way a programmer does it, except it does it while I'm in the kitchen making a snack.
ZorbaTHut
11d ago
Some of this might actually be fixed, or at least, in a position where it can be fixed. We had a problem for a while where updating the software was impossible because it caused crashes and largescale fixes were sketchy due to how badly tested it was. Thankfully, with the rise of AI, I can (and have) just point Claude at the codebase and say "write a ton of tests kthx" and now it's a lot less questionable to do work on.
It actually found a few bugs while writing the tests which was pretty funny.
ZorbaTHut
11d ago
Honestly, I'll take some credit, but the mods have been putting a lot more work into it lately than I have. Give them most of that credit :)
ZorbaTHut
12d ago
Nobody mentioned it to me until maybe twelve hours ago :V I think it's now fixed, I think the computer it was on was having problems and the solution ended up being "bump it to another computer" . . . after doing a few in-retrospect-unnecessary optimizations. But hey, at least the optimizations are done.
ZorbaTHut
12d ago
The thing that's weird about this, though, is that it ramped up gradually over a period of a week. And it's hard to believe that us specifically would get a massive increase in traffic over simultaneously such a long and a short period of time.
That said, I may have solved it; I think we were just on a crummy cloud computer, I recycled the node and performance is fine again. Gotta remember that for next time.
ZorbaTHut
12d ago
To be honest, I'm not sure. If it's a DDOS it's a weirdly terrible one that's spending a lot of effort looking like a misbehaving web crawler. On the other hand, if it's a misbehaving web crawler, it's a weirdly terrible one that's spending a lot of effort looking somewhat like a DDOS.
Either that or we've gotten incredibly popular in China over the last week.
It's not just you. Working on it. :)
(Should be better now, I'll let it sit for half an hour or so and see how it's going. More work may be needed.)
(Edit: Sigh, not solved. Still working on it.)
(This may now be fixed; I think we were just running on bad hardware.)
ZorbaTHut
1mo ago
Yeah, it's trying to remove tracking codes, so I decided to leave that in for now.
ZorbaTHut
1mo ago
This should now be fixed. I also stripped out the weird URL-replacement stuff that was going on :)
ZorbaTHut
7mo ago
I should definitely do that - I actually started a #workshop thread on a Discord for much the same reason, though unfortunately a lot of stuff that I'm doing is backend and hard to share in interesting ways. But I'll see if I can start posting there when I do have things of interest :)
ZorbaTHut
7mo ago
Absolutely! I'm hoping to get a somewhat-serious public release in the next few months.
ZorbaTHut
7mo ago
Is he really busy with work? Life in general?
Pretty much, yeah.
(ping @TitaniumButterfly @Southkraut)
So, here, lemme give a sort of tl;dr of The Shape Of Zorba's Life.
I vaguely divide most of my tasks into a few categories. In no particular order, those are:
- Sanity
- Family
- Survival
- Professional hobby
- Unprofessional hobby
The tricky part is that I usually have time for at most four of them. Unsurprisingly, Sanity, Family, and Survival end up in those four. They're kinda important.
In my case, I work in the game industry. So "professional hobby" is making my own game studio. "Unprofessional hobby" is The Motte. I end up having to choose between them, and for a while, I was aiming most of that spare time at The Motte in the hopes I could make it start paying for itself; if The Motte could take over Survival (which more-or-less gets summarized as Money, usually in the form of Day Job) then suddenly "I have time for four of them" starts looking pretty good.
Well, I'm not going to say that outcome is impossible, but at the moment, it seems pretty unlikely. I took a serious shot, it did not immediately work out. This meant I had the long-term choice of sacrificing professional-hobby in favor of unprofessional-hobby, or vice-versa.
That whole "can I make The Motte take over Survival" thing also applies to the game studio, though. And I found myself in a situation where I had some really promising ideas and tools, which made it seem like I had a plausible shot at making Professional Hobby actually become my day job, thus subsuming Survival entirely, if I started working for myself and managed to get something viable before I ran out of savings.
And so that's what I'm fundamentally focusing on. If I can collapse Professional Hobby and Survival into one thing, then I have spare time to keep working on Motte stuff. But I just can't afford to get too distracted from this, because the bank account isn't going to last forever.
So the tl;dr is that I ended up needing to triage and The Motte got the short end of the stick. That doesn't mean it's abandoned - I really do want to work on it - that just means that there's enough stuff I have more immediate needs for that it has to be sidelined for now.
I will say that the mods have done a great job of keeping this place going. Its current survival is entirely thanks to them and I am extremely grateful. Fingers crossed that my current project is successful - in fact I'm looking at a major milestone coming up in a week that'll give me a much better sense of whether this is viable - and if it is, then I'll be able to come back to The Motte and put some serious effort into long-term plans that I simply never managed to work on.
Until then . . . keep it up, y'all.
ZorbaTHut
11mo ago
How do you in-person voters... remember anything meaningful?
I go over the sample ballot, make my choices, and either mark them down on the sample ballot or print them out.
Then I bring that in as a cheat sheet and just follow it.
I used to write it down on my phone, but the state I'm in disallows phones while voting, so, paper solution.
Yeah, this actually might be somewhat reverted now, I'm still messing with stuff.
More options
Context Copy link