My takeaway is that he would have gotten away with it if he had the restraint to not go around confessing to murder. Probably would have helped to not steal from the house after it's a murder scene rather than a robbery, but it sounds like no one would have bothered to look in his trunk if he just shut up about it. The implications are discomfiting.
I really have no idea what you mean. What is DR3? What are you saying in plain language?
The one who would likely win in a physical fight is the alpha.
Sorry, I stopped reading your wall of text here. Humans form alliances. We use these big calorie-hungry brains to navigate social systems. The winner in a fight is not the bigger, stronger man, but the one with the most allies.
“This translation service isn't available in your region”
That’s classic Petteri Taalas.
You’re missing an assumption: to get your conclusion, your preference for B must be continuous in X. To illustrate, I am fine with dogs living so long as no kids are harmed, but the second one hair on a kid’s head is harmed, genocide all the dogs. There’s no amount of dead kids for which I’m ambivalent about genocide.
For further reference, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermediate_value_theorem
Here you’ll get modded for not speaking plainly.
lots of people get their windows smashed in, say, San Francisco, too,
A bar so low it's painted on the floor.
Containing viruses is hard. I'd consider a lab leak to be within the normal range of human screw ups. In light of that fact, everybody up and down the chain of command who thought it was a good idea to do gain-of-function research on coronaviruses should be tried on 10 million counts of manslaughter.
Meh. Like feet, cups, tablespoons and teaspoons, it’s something I have around the house.
"threaten" doesn't really do it justice. She was mid-throw in an attempt to do so.
Is it constitutively part of policing to kill someone because they threaten you with being scalded?
Hard to tell if this is a rhetorical question, but in the interests of speaking plainly: Yea, of course. Police officers killing people who attempt to harm them is a shitty system, but it's better than all the alternatives.
You have this exactly backwards. Centralized services force a singular moral sensibility on everyone in the world. The cure is federation, or some equivalent of self-hosting or associating with like-minded people.
Edit: Zuckerberg, Musk, and Pichai are the people I should never empower.
Then your post has zero entropy. The world would have been a better place had you not bothered.
You should use this as an opportunity to re-evaluate your esteem of 538. Nate Silver left and it’s not what it once was.
“Generic X” always does better than any concrete candidate because people will think of their own perfect idealized person. Means very little other than as an upper bound.
To many of his voters, Covid was Trumps fault
You say this as if it's not true. I thought it was common knowledge amongst the people who cared enough to look into it. In 2017, Trump lifted Obama's ban on gain of function research, and subsequently the NIH funded gain of function research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Shockingly, yes, people are mostly betting no.
https://polymarket.com/event/will-joe-pardon-hunter-biden?tid=1721237578763
I find headsets uncomfortable to wear for even short periods of time.
While hilarious, this is wildly inappropriate to say under most any circumstances imaginable. These are people going through the same struggles we all go through.
Whether you call it "dementia" or "age related cognitive impairment" is irrelevant. Pretty clearly something changed since 4 years ago. It's hard to notice because ablity to read a teleprompter is an extremely low hurdle to clear. I was just commenting that noticeably more people started saying the emperor had no clothes earlier this spring, rather than just the right-wing political hacks who've been saying it for years. I'm thinking specifically of the Wall Street Journal and Special Counsel Robert Hur.
Despite fumbling the beginning and ending, Biden had a legitimately pretty good 30-minute stretch in the middle. I suspect he was given a shot of something good, but the timing was too close to the start of the debate. There are a lot of nootropic-interested people on this board. I should ask if this sounds congruent with any cognitive performance enhancing drug.
Biden has been gaffe-prone his entire life. But I believe there's been an increasing chorus of voices talking about something adjacent to early stages of dementia starting around the beginning of this year. Sorry, no specific citations, just my general impression from listening to lots of news and pundits.
Nah, it's the opposite. Psychopaths can only thrive if they can meet new people to victimize. A close-knit community that stays together for a long time is the best defense against psychopaths.
Huh?
Are you saying an overwhelming majority of humans are your political enemies? Or that your political enemies have a inordinate disposition to needing blood transfusions? This is a bewildering comment.
Feelings and preferences are legitimate. Full stop. Anybody trying to shame you into thinking otherwise is not your friend and is likely trying to manipulate you to their own selfish ends.
Nah, Red Pill stuff is a great antidote to the lies that everywhere else in culture is pushing: that women are wonderful and to put the pussy on a pedestal. It’s helpful for a class of guys who can’t figure out why being nice doesn’t get them a date or get them laid. The criticism I’d level against it is that the skills that get you laid are practically unrelated to the skills necessary to maintain relationships and build families. But you have to crawl before you run.
More options
Context Copy link