ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
You're probably referring to this, and the recent follow-up. Much like you, I think the flaming-out poster is entirely imagining any "10 step plan to reshape society so that AAs collectively have reduced social impact, freedom, rights, and political power".
HBD is boring to me
Fair, but I don't think you should misrepresent others' opinions.
Followed up by here's my 10 step plan to reshape society so that AAs collectively have reduced social impact, freedom, rights, and political power.
Can you give an example? Most I've seen is people arguing to remove the special privileges that were given to them, and therefore to actually equalize social impact, freed, rights, and political power.
Do you really want to tell me that the average HBD believers, Alt right, and dissident rightists are in any form individualists?
Yes. Allowing for collectivism in your framework is not the same thing as "not being individualist in any form", though with how extreme the demands for individualism are (at least as far as a certain group of people is concerned), I understand the distinction might be too subtle to notice.
It sounds like you're disagreeing with his argument. I don't really have on opinion on the proportion of autists to AGPs, I'm saying he might be perfectly right about their prevalence in either locality, but it's irrelevant to how acceptable I find trans activism.
They changed something in how they format the data. This happens every once in a while and usually gets fixed within a few days.
I absolutely despise modern journalism and it's inability to present information, but hey, turns out you're actually right. On the other hand - darts. I tried to find results for pool / snooker, but that only yielded a lot of mewling from journos. So it's not a clear "no differences in hand-eye coordination" thing, but it turns out Samuel Colt did, in fact, make us equal.
Is it possible the "transgender intolerance" of the right is a self reinforcing feedback loop?
Nope. Portraying the trans issue as being primarily about who gets to go to which bathroom, or some visceral "ick" factor, is at least 10 years out of date. The reaction to the trans issues comes from progressives seeing the provision of irreversible medical procedures to minors as an inalienable human right, that justifies nearly everything, including public school teachers transing children behind their parents' backs.
The EU makes no laws about that. The EU has no police force or court. The EU can’t jail anyone.
Oh wait, this is not how you phrased it originally. The EU very much does make laws about it, and it does have it's own courts.
So what?
Right back at you. It's still accurate to portray the EU, particularly the legal entity, as anti free speech, because it clearly is.
I also don't recall people claiming the cases in Germany and the UK are representative of all of Europe, so I'd appreciate a link. I also don't remember anyone's claims being exaggerated, people accurately reported on actually existing cases.
The European Union as an entity has a clear anti free speech stance, regardless of what member states think on the subject.
Presumably this was a Grindr hosted political event rather than a literal gay orgy.
Porque no los dos? Even the CPAC confererence has a reputation for being a depraved pit of debauchery, what chance does a liberal event organized by Grindr have?
33% have between 6 and 21 children
What?!
I don't disbelieve, I'm just impressed. Even if the top of the range is that one couple who really fucks, the sheer logistics of it all...
Why should I privilege the views of a non American specifically selected on idealogically grounds over the 12 randomly selected ordinary American citizens who apparently spent like two weeks listening to just the testimonies alone who all decided he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
I never understood this argument. The evidence the jury gets to hear is curated, so they don't necessarily see everything, the quality of the arguments depends on which side can afford a better lawyer, and people are easily manipulated by the general zeitgeist and the media bombarding them with propaganda about racist police.
Also no one is arguing you to privilege the guy's argument, presumably you posses sufficient reasoning faculties to evaluate his argument on your own.
The US won for ~20 years, we had dominance over most of Afghanistan while barely even lifting a finger.
The "barely lifting a finger" was a massive money pit that could have funded all sorts of "everybody gets a pony" programa from universal healthcare to a permanent base on the moon, and the "winning" was a state where you failed to subdue your enemy.
The issue techieland has isn't in winning the war, but in convincing their people that a war halfway across the planet is worth the relatively minor expenditure on them against a group of people who see their side as existential and go into hiding.
Even in that framing it sounds like they have a shortage of manly men that would enable them to take decisive action.
"The government we set up collapsed, and we had to leave" is a curious definition of victory.
If you moved Belgium next to the Taliban any war would be laughably one sided in Belgium's favor.
Belgium has a quarter of the population of Afghanistan, and almost 10% of it is Muslim. Moving it closer would, if anything, work to their disadvantage.
Who wins?
Techieland obviously.
That's not what I saw in Afghanistan.
Claude lied to me! So here I was trying to optimize the bullet simulation. To do that I have to create a similar spatial index that I made for the bugs. That one is kept in a series of buffers, which in glsl work kind of like C structs. Now wanting to recreate 3-4 of those I was wondering if there's a way to somehow keep the bullet data in the same buffer as the bugs, but have the data well organized. Since the bug-data is an arbitrary length array that gets tricky, I can't have two of those in the same buffer... but I could do that if one of them is fixed length. Then I find out the glsl also has "constants" that you can set from the cpu-side, and that I can use them to define array lengths. Like I said, lies.
It sort of worked but the program was using the constant's default value, not the one set from the CPU. A series of bugs ensued that weren't entirely obvious to troubleshoot. When I finally got to the bottom of it, it turned out I'm back at square one. Next step: do the same thing again, but with actual compile-time constants.
How have you been doing @Southkraut?
I've seen lots of hemming and hawing as to why there's a difference, but not many attempts to quantify it. I suppose someone could go over various pool, darts, or e-sports tournaments and compare scores between leagues, but that's a bit too much work for me.
Well those are the same thing.
Hardly. It clearly means if you're organizing opposition against Skynet, you still should put men in charge of the military affairs. We may ultimately lose, but "we'll all die anyway, so it doesn't matter" is a very defeatist attitude.
Sorry, I was under the impression you were making the argument that women can contribute to warfare nearly equally to men, not that Skynet will eat us for breakfast.
But even more importantly, modern warfare just doesnt really care as much about your physical capabilities as nature did. What wins war isn't manly men with thick abs swinging their muscular fists at each other anymore. What truly wins modern wars (if things are even "winnable" traditionally now) is the logistics and science, even Rambo has no defense against a drone swarm.
Women also get btfo'd in hand-eye coordination contests, which doesn't bode well for female drone pilots, and logistics games are probably one of the most male-skewed hobbies on the planet.
Wouldn't call it "happy", but of that's what it takes, I can take one for the team.
put a retard in charge of HHS
You are, of course, referring to the person that abolished minimum age recommendations for trans hormone treatments and surgeries, right?
No, somehow this one has not popped up on my feeds.
Not surprising, for my part I've seen an interview with a Ukrainian mother that moved to California because of the war, and had her daughter put into foster care and transed. Blue states are still full steam ahead with this stuff.
- Prev
- Next

Yes, I agree, but I don't think they're so collectivist that they've purged any trace of individualism from their worldview, which I think would be necessary to confidently answer a question like "Do you really want to tell me that the average HBD believers, Alt right, and dissident rightists are in any form individualists?" in the negative.
More options
Context Copy link