boo
3d ago
it's not really acceptable but there's little that could be done.
Repeal the 19th
boo
9mo ago
I do, seems like common sense. Why do you think they wouldn't take an action that helps them? The action not instantly guaranteeing them a win doesn't mean its not worth taking. It's one action among many
boo
9mo ago
Maybe, that's true. Unsure if there have been any psychological studies on this effect, would be interesting to know for sure. However, clearly elite dems subscribe to my prediction, otherwise why buy 538 and libbify it?
boo
9mo ago
A human is a living thing that either was previously born as an infant homo sapiens or given proper time or care, barring natural medical issues, will be so in the future.
Seems airtight to me. Covers the favorite abortionist argument of "why aren't you crying over the load of cum in the toilet." If it was, is or is going to be an infant homo sapiens, it's a human, and it shouldn't be killed for convenience.
boo
1yr ago
This could be true for a lot of things; probably the most optimistic way to view the future of social media. Either we figure out a way to 100% know if a human is writing a post or social media becomes worthless and people stop caring about it as much and start venturing back into the real world more. Win/win
boo
9mo ago
You don't have the right to expose other people's kids to any ideas the parents don't want them exposed to. Parents have an absolute veto on any random creeps having physical or digital contact with their kids and doing it behind their back via discord is disgusting.
We're going to need some text embeddable proof that the writer is human in every social media site. Hell every site, people are only going to want to read text written by a human unless they're specifically looking for AI text. Of course you can always generate the text and then embed the proof you're human alongside it, but at LEAST knowing it's not purely a bot would be helpful for social media.
Possible approaches:
-
Recording of someone typing the comment
-
could AI generate the comment and pay others to type it for you, would at least be harder than just a bot tho
-
too annoying for normal users
-
-
Captcha included and visible with comment, type the solution into the comment
- arms race would result using successful comments as training data
Any other ideas? Anyone know of research/projects in this space to look into?
boo
1yr ago
All it takes is a janny who decides he doesn't like naughty words in any context and you'll be shadowbanned here too, there's no protection against redditization.
boo
1yr ago
Why not just ban them? What is so horrible about open and clear moderation?
Why leave reddit only to bring the worst parts of reddit along with you? You could make something better.
boo
9mo ago
It works much like the YouTube algorithm— if a certain type of answer keeps you using the app, the LLM is much more likely to give similar responses in the future.
How do you know this?
boo
9mo ago
If there are no sites predicting an R win or even a close win when someone R leaning googles, they may be less likely to care about voting. Seems like a no-brainer to use your control over the media to make this happen by any means necessary.
boo
10mo ago
You have the free will to act as you will as far as your agency goes, and call someone the N-word, but if you demand insularity and protection from the consequences of someone who pulls a gun out and shoots you for it, you aren't a person that wants freedom
One of those is a word, the other is murder, my 𝓃𝒾𝑔𝑔ℯ𝓇. Nobody advocates for the freedom to murder, people in sane countries do advocate for the freedom to say whatever words you want.
boo
9mo ago
South Americans are heavily mixed with natives, hence most of them are no longer white.
He's still a Hollywood actor/director, and it being a "this is how to roll over and die happy about the Great Replacement" story doesn't make it not an example of the trope
boo
9mo ago
So it's a positively-spun Great Replacement narrative, as was originally claimed.
boo
10mo ago
Hah, this is so hidebound and backward I can't tell if you're being serious. I could just as easily say "click at the wrong time, you just deleted an hours work!" Get real.
You aren't forced to twitch your finger regularly. Get real. Sorry to break it to you friend.
boo
9mo ago
Of course, it guarantees their food and rent without having to work. Women are unsurprisingly over twice as likely to be an unemployed spouse than men. See https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/famee.pdf -> Opposite-sex married-couple families
Plus, fuckup women can still pull non-fuckup men. Not the other way around (as often)
boo
9mo ago
If I happen to Notice that white people seem to need less help going to college and setting up their life absent intervention than Hispanic people, and so I decide to set up the dynamic in the movie according to how I see it - the white guy helping the Hispanic guys because it'd look weird the other way around, is that "deliberate agenda pushing"?
They don't "happen to notice" that black people are criminals more often, that women can't beat men in fights, and that in fact not every relationship is interracial.
All of that looks weird, yet they persist in pushing their alternate reality. Almost as if being realistic is not their motivation
People in some areas of the US have regular encounters with black bears, who are in fact pretty harmless.
More options
Context Copy link