dont_log_me_out
No bio...
User ID: 686
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
The sexuality and sexual experiences of our children is one of those few times where a clear bias exists within each and everyone of us and if the science gave us an answer the was counter to that bias then we would deny and burn down the science department. That is to say, it's one of the few dark spaces in scientific discourse where the science becomes irrelevant by the end of the day due to extreme public blowback.
So honestly by the end of the day all I can say on the subject is that you will almost likely never get a satisfactory discussion on the subject matter if you go against the current acceptable standard at any point in history, and arguing for or against even neutrally is not worth the social status loss risk of doing so.
And just to further clarify, my statements here are not from a they don't want to hear they are wrong about 16 being too young position, rather my lack of joy is from a I hate science having dark no go spaces when it clashes against social beliefs and comfort zones.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Doesn't have to be conspirational. You may want less jews for the same reason you might want less white men on a board representing a diverse city, or more support programs for underprivileged black youth. Sometimes being from the same ethnic group results in similar experiences which may blind one to the experiences of other groups.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Hey I never said I was an exception to the rule, i am just further proof of the rule being true.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
would you expect Mohamed to be #19 for French boys in 2019?
I mean by 19th ranked name for all you know you are on the name used by 1% or 0.1%. That honestly doesn't sound so bad.
Assuming the most extreme case of all names being equally popular, Mohammad would be the name of 5.2% of men. Still a vast minority.
Also all the refugees Europe took.
The upper classes irrespective of cultural background tend to integrate better. Maybe just stop taking in poor people.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Eh. If all the Mohammed's behave culturally french and are 3rd generation french citizens then they are french. Naming conventions live on far longer than all other cultural habits. Just look at the surname Smith for example.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Utilitarian systems or practice styles seem to survive the longest in a competitive environment so even with no active intent that's what we end up with?
You are obviously uneducated too but I do not see how that is relevant to our conversation now. ( I jest dramanaut. )
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Makes sense. I am just saying that eh, my life is more valuable anyways is a free get out of jail card from any guilt for any action you will ever take.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Same for East European states.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
If feminism misguided then why South Korea collapsing first?
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
What you said makes sense in the scenario you created.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
In their individual lives yes, to pass judgement onto others outside their direct experience no.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
And innocent until proven guilty matters to make sure you do not get the wrong guy based on your opinions.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Noted. Thank you!
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Yes, thank you!
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
True true, I am just saying it is not the only meaningful variable.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
I mean being a genius isn't even all that great. Being smart does not guarantee social success, nor does it guarantee the best income. If you wanted to be rich you would be a businessman. If you wanted to maximize reproductive success you would keep working out. I think one of the primary issues is that on the functional society level we fail to realize that there are multiple solutions and values beyond intelligence. I am pretty sure I can make myself sound smarter than almost everyone I know, but my reproductive success is the lowest nonetheless. You gotta accept the markers then look at where you are deficient and what to do about it.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Of yeah I am a firm believer of human biodiversity.
The thing is that society is fully functional only at the level where it has evened out its diversity levels. We managed to do that at the national level then it stopped. One day we achieve enough intermixing at the continental level and it no longer matters again.
The group expands either by further intermixing of larger and larger groups or in a competitive state some groups simply dying out over time.
Believing this leads you to a lot of inferences/conclusions that are very controversial to say out loud in polite society.
It's only controversial as long as people do not understand that working out will make anybody seem more attractive and attractive people have the highest reproductive success rate.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
I thought I did. My bad.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
I would not be surprised if there was a noticeable minority that unironically like the main character in American Psycho. As I understand it the actor who plays the titular character had to go on camera to explain to the people that you aren't supposed to root for the main character. Add in the fact that the main character does reflect a form of masculinity that from his own point of view makes him a tough person, and one can see where the fans who like him genuinely come from.
I have met people in real life who would admit they thought the character of the main psycho was a horrible guy but also a chad.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Why? It was an effortpost on rdrama, why can I not reuse the effortpost?
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
I am not a troll. What would assure you of the same?
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Not really, I just wrote something I liked and it felt partly culture warry so I shared it on the culture war thread. Nothing deeper than that.
I think nobody else gets this because of how famous Rick and Morty continues to be among the zoomer generation and the fact as you pointed out yourself that most of society has a lower than 100 iq.
dont_log_me_out
2yr ago
Nice. Thank you.
No, I clearly mentioned wanting less whites on a board how have you equated that with affirmative action for whites?
More options
Context Copy link