@function's banner p

function


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 07 08:55:57 UTC

				

User ID: 937

function


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 07 08:55:57 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 937

Maybe he means the iterated game but yeah it's a weird way to put it

Russia might not be much better than the poshest prison cell you can afford

What?

It's wild that there's 4chan-styled "user was banned for this post" flairs here now lol. Very lindy

Like most who commented I was very surprised about galaxies being that close. Thanks for the info. But I have no idea how that was supposed to test my estimation skills tbh. It's clearly not common knowledge.

Honestly, this sounds like something a person who doesn't experience being piled on enough would say.

I'm not even familiar with that. Only know it in terms of settlements, e.g. company v. union under third party (the arbiter). Guessing it's "price arbitrage" meaning profiting off price discrepancies. But not sure how it relates to betting under the circumstances OP described, maybe it's the same thing.

I don't have much to add here except to say that this has been a very shocking/amusing development. I use instagram, and the amount of my female friends who just casually post pole dancing videos in revealing underwear is completely weirding me out. I'm not complaining of course, I'm simply bewildered. Just a few years ago I would find it unthinkable.

And the 9s/10s that get into modeling also appear to have this culture of getting naked at every opportunity. Not with a pornographic intent, it's always 'artistic' to some extent.

books had a sufficient potential liability on Trump they were literally encouraging arbitrage

What does "encouraging arbitrage" mean here?

Alright, makes sense. I guess I'm just one of those people who doesn't form romantic bonds. Completely alien to me.

But I will note this reads a bit like ideology in that it conflates a useful social technology of monogamy with something natural and true. It seems like throughout history and today, powerful men had no issues with such bonding, and in fact one of the main motivators for men is access to a variety of women. Their goals aren't to faithfully commit to a single one.

I'm sorry but this reads like mega-cope. I think most of my friends of the "chad" variety find quite a lot of value in it.

Worldnews is more interested in bullshit and propaganda than predictions.

Can someone explain to me how sex with no strings hurts people, and specifically how it hurts women more? In an age of contraceptives?

I'm not saying it's not true, it obviously is. I've been in situations where "sex with no strings" turned out to have a lot of expectations attached after all, while I on the other hand would be perfectly fine if we just went on with our lives. As would most men I know. (Maybe I'm some awful combination of high value enough to be given a chance, but not high value enough for it to be free.)

So it must be true, because they wouldn't bother pursuing anything more un

Can someone explain this thread to a confused Slav? I thought "are Slavs white" question was just an expression of good old-fashioned Anglo supremacism. And that it was aimed at our culture. But people here seem to be seriously discussing whether we are white, in literal terms.

What does it mean? Personally I am probably paler than most Anglos. Most people in my country are paler than Italians or Spaniards. What's going on?

Personally I'd live in a socialist socially conservative Denmark

He hasn't been particularly active recently.

What's the economic cost of torturing 100 disabled, net-cost people? If it's second-order effects of normalizing such practices, good luck reasoning about a concrete number...

Some limited nato training since 2014 simply eclipsed the entire Russian military.

More like a force of 150k couldn't fight a force of 900k. We'll see how this plays out on a less uneven field soon.

I wouldn't read that book because reading is much harder than watching a TV series but I do get your point. GoT is worsened by its bad ending, how can I argue it's not. I'm just saying it's not completely ruined and that I'll rewatch it no problem.

Do beware: I initially almost dropped it out of annoyance at the woke casting of one Old Valyrian family (not the Targaryens thankfully). Since then they've more than made up for it. On the other hand, the woke actors are at least very good, and it's consistent (instead of making random characters black they really bit the bullet and made an entire family black with white hair).

Fair enough, they certainly might fuck it up. Personally I think it's much less likely than it was for GoT. Baseline probability for fucking up shows that start so great is low, smaller scope, and lessons learned are still my arguments.

But that's not the point. I just don't share the overall sentiment that GoT is not worth watching because they fucked up the last few seasons. It feels like you are substituting the legacy of the whole show for its overall quality.

That's true in general but not here I think. Other 'good' series usually manage to maintain great scriptwriting, for example Sopranos, Breaking Bad, etc. Bad scriptwriting is the default starting position, but series that start good and are intended to be good really do require special circumstances to go down the drain.

We know what caused the GoT fiasco (lack of source material, producers wanted out, extremely long and built careers which caused pressure to move on). Those are the conditions.

I think it's still worth watching, more than anything I've watched over the last few years. It dethroned Better Call Saul as my favorite. It would suck if they cock it up but the writing, acting, and aesthetics are still so good that they stand on their own.

You're genuinely depriving yourself of something Great.

Besides, why would they cock it up again? Are the conditions for that happening even there? It's a finished story of a smaller scope. They know they fucked up. I'm not worried.

I saw people saying that he was on there very briefly. It might be a Russian psyop of course but they put children and Roger Waters on there. So they might as well have put Musk before someone with a brain gave them a call.

Did you watch HoD? It's genuinely amazing. Not sure how to put it exactly but its treatment of power and tragedy makes GoT look one-dimensional. And there are some scenes that took my "#1 Tv/movie writing" spot. For example king Viserys' ruminating on the nature of his rule and what it means to be King to his Hand, if you've seen it.

This show deserves more cultural spotlight than GoT had, imo. And I love GoT.

808s is considered his worst album? Weird it's my favorite