greyenlightenment
investments: META/FBL, TSLA, TQQQ, TECL, MSFT ...
User ID: 68
my original post explicitly mentioned polling
so what? does not change my point that biden did not see a polling decline after bad debate performance
then what polling site is more accurate? even if the model does not work as well or nate is a partisan hack, the data clearly shows biden did not lose approval points after his bad debate
He's taking the spotlight because the very act of selecting him is newsworthy in and of itself.
I am glad I didn't have any money on this. I have found no one can predict political outcomes reliably, and nothing confers an edge unless you are an insider.
elon is one of those people who can make anything work
meant in terms of polling. 538 unchanged
meant in terms of polling. 538 unchanged
A good running mate is someone who covers her weaknesses. So this would be be a center-leaning while male.
it would go down as one of his most original jokes
it cannot be worse than Biden's performance.
The evidence suggests Trump is more popular. Trump's turnout for 2020 was 10 million greater than 2016. You'd have to go as far back as Reagan for a candidate to be have a >55% of popular vote. Most candidates are not that popular, and the outcome comes down to the margins, like swing states, and that is where Trump shines.
i don't think it matters that much. The debate performance already caused voters to lose confidence in him. Him stepping down does not come as a surprise.
Debates do not matter that much. Even Biden's polls did not budge after the worst debate performance ever. Swing states are what matter, and this is why trump will win. Her problem is that expectations will be higher compared to Biden.
interesting how both our comments were downvoted despite being at odds. goes to show how it's irrelevant what you say, but who says it. respected members can post anything and always gets lots of votes.
So in the span of 8 days: trump assassination attempt, Cloudstrike, and now the presumptive democratic nominee steps down, a first in decades. I think you'd have to go as far back as LBJ the last time this happened. The big winner is Elon Musk and twitter by putting himself center in the media spectacle. In hindsight, it looks like his purchase will pay off as the news cycle continues to intensify and twitter surges in use.
but the problem is norms can change suddenly and unpredictably, for both sides
but the existence of repercussions for voicing seriously delusional takes creates a chilling effect and prevents many of those takes from being voiced
this is good in principle, but it would seem as of it when one side is typically on the of said repercussions. California has the right approach in this regard, for everything else that is wrong with the Golden state.
i think the culture of secrecy is the bigger problem. they are paid lot and expected to not blabber to the media if they expect to be employed now or in the future by other companies
When the pendulum precesses , you don't know when you're on the receiving end until too late.
The more conventional the opinion, the more cartoonishly sadistic its enforcement. They love to talk about what ought to be done to pedophiles — not because they have unusually strong opinions about the well-being of children, but because pedophiles provide the broadest possible canvas on which to fantasize about social cruelty.
I think this has more to do with rallying support among a shelling point: pedos deserve to have violence inflicted on them, so as a way of making their other views palatable by first establishing a common ground..
Automatic updates are the worst thing . Everyone hates them yet companies do it.
This is like seeing a jet plane crash in the 1960s and being like "this idea will not work" or the Titanic sinking and thinking the same thing. Enough companies rely on such services that evidently it's worthwhile despite these risks.
But you bet your ass that everyone lost a lot of money today and that it may take weeks (or months) for some businesses to get back to the black.
The market's reaction was surprisingly sanguine to this. CRWD stock opened 11% lower and stayed that way; almost everyone thought it would be down 30% or more. The Nasdaq was green for the first 2 hours and then went red, which could have been due to anything.
The economy is huge. Even when critical things fail, there is enough stuff that works, plus rapid response to fix the problem, that the damage is not as bad as the hype would suggest. Ironically ,a bigger problem entails a more rapid response to fix it, so it ends up being briefer or not as bad.
Boeing's planes fall out of the sky.
I could be wrong, but the number of fatal Boeing crashes or lesser incidents is not an outlier compared to past incidents and other manufactures before all the media scrutiny. Anyone remember the 737 rudder jams during the 90s? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_rudder_issues#:~:text=During%20the%201990s%2C%20a%20series,board%2C%20157%20people%20in%20total.
It was a different model and hardly got similar media attention despite two major accidents with lots of fatalities close together

Write it down , periodically refer to it by glancing at it and mentally reciting it, at which point it should be easy to commit it to memory. Look for patterns in numbers or words.
More options
Context Copy link