I read somewhere that fiscally right conservatives become leftists when it comes to all matters reproductive.
Death is a necessary part of one particular configuration of an ecosystem, and appealing to nature is pointless. Everything is natural.
edit: not even that. Like darkness is an absence of life, death is an absence of longevity. It is not "a part" of life, it is that longevity is not a (necessary) part of life based on sexual reproduction. "You have outlived your usefulness", says the gene once it is duplicated and recombinated into a fresh host. I'm sorry, but who asked?
How about I receive "not getting stabbed in my sleep for daring to do something to my own body", and you receive "not getting herded into a luddite concentration camp before you lot start stabbing people"?
The same plans people had on the frontier, but with a higher range of activities and environments available?
Is "exercising one's advantage in natural selection over arjin_ferman" not a deliberate action whether they do it traditionally or not? What, they slip and their dick falls into a woman producing genetically fit children on accident?
If that's considered an existential threat to humanity, then homo sapiens was an existential threat to homo erectus and your son is a tiny existential threat to yourself.
Aging is merely the ability of the body to repair itself breaking down. Who says we mustn't repair that one, too? (Rhetorical question, Christians!)
As a mild transhumanist, I don't like the perspective of a subroutine that's somewhat similar to the processes in our brains either. It's approximately as valuable to me after I perish as 1+ organisms that have genes somewhat similar to some of the genes I had: i. e. not at all.
I resolve to not upload myself until either I'm terminally ill or old anyway, or the uploading technology demonstrates that it can support continuity and wholeness of thought (such as, for example, Ship-of-Theseusing a willing test subject halfway).
If Yud can get laid with multiple women in rat circles, then I'm willing to believe that no, they really don't require a 6'+ gigachad at minimum or anything like that.
Will they jail the reckless CEO the same way as a reckless pothead driver when their car kills someone (or 10/100/1000 someones)?
If GPT hallucinates a wrong and deadly treatment, who do you sue for malpractice?
If the word "fair" appies to conquering in your books then you might as well own stealing as well. After all, conquering is merely stealing while having enough manpower to do so openly.
No, you cannot, because deterrence does not work when everyone thinks "well I can just not be violent on drugs".
Watch? The way you ostentatiously described it I'd think I could play there.
Upgrade perhaps, but still looks like to be an upgrade primarily in the areas where he can just do his own thing, once allocated resources, and drop a breakthrough paper. Allocating resources sounds like a bigger problem to be when moving towards superhumanity.
Why is it always Von Neumann? Last I recall he was a physicist, not a brilliant leader, warlord or businessman who solves coordination problems.
I do not believe showing children Michelangelo is something to be "defended" as if it's a bad thing. Why do you feel the need to censor what has long been accepted as high art, as if children would be struck blind by a marble penis? Take some folk wisdom from Sarge Colon - if it has a vase, it's decent to look at.
though maybe we'd quibble about doctor-skepticism-induced inaction being as costly as equivalent action.
The natural contrarians of today are lucky to have "boiling water" ingrained enough in them to not be questioned.
I find immortal or at least vastly-more-longliving transhumanism within our lifetime to be more likely than FOOM AGI society collapse.
How much more of a stake in a future can anyone have than literally being an immortal transhumanist?
Learn to cater, I imagine.
Misgendering an alleged trans person is not the same as calling a black person "nigger". It's more like saying "if you do X, you ain't black". Calling an alleged trans person "tranny" or "troon" would be an appropriate analogy.
I find that progressives do deny that people they dislike belong yo the protected group, but they will almost never use protected group slurs.
What is this fixation on "video games"? I've also seen 1 second no fail reloading in video games, doesn't mean it's relevant. I believe others have provided enough arguments in favor of slightly less optimal action (switching guns) being better than an optimal action that requires practice to be optimal (reloading). Plus weapon breakdown risk.
Have you kept any examples of tge modifications it made?
Doesn't the whole "Heaven" thing require that you die, as opposed to sticking around and possibly, God forbid, start getting ideas of building your own heaven on earth?
More options
Context Copy link