sun_the_second
No bio...
User ID: 2725
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I don't know about that. If the Fall did subtract from nature, it subtracted quite a lot, to the point where most of creation we can access is far from fundamentally good.
The Patrician took a sip of his beer. “I have told this to few people, gentlemen, and I suspect I never will again, but one day when I was a young boy on holiday in Uberwald I was walking along the bank of a stream when I saw a mother otter with her cubs. A very endearing sight, I’m sure you will agree, and even as I watched, the mother otter dived into the water and came up with a plump salmon, which she subdued and dragged on to a half-submerged log. As she ate it, while of course it was still alive, the body split and I remember to this day the sweet pinkness of its roes as they spilled out, much to the delight of the baby otters who scrambled over themselves to feed on the delicacy. One of nature’s wonders, gentlemen: mother and children dining upon mother and children. And that’s when I first learned about evil. It is built into the very nature of the universe. Every world spins in pain. If there is any kind of supreme being, I told myself, it is up to all of us to become his moral superior.”
Which is to say, the order of things in nature absent our, the humans', vigorous actioned disagreement, does not always seem very good for us.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I have some. I've read themotte, as you can guess. The mindset of "what skin off the back of upstanding citizens is it to just let them die" does not become less alien to me. I don't like the jingoist boomers of my country either, but I hardly dream of rounding them up behind the shed or draining their towns of resources until they drink themselves to death.
There are two classes that I can imagine an average and sane citizen to overlook and mentally discount in this manner, which is the habitual violent criminals and those who are so dysfunctional that they barely intersect with regular society or economy (homeless, heavy drug users, mentally disabled). Not those who like it up the ass.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Do you have no friends among "Them"? If you do, do you expect all of them to drop you at some point? If you don't, why would you expect anyone to speak for you any more than you speak for them?
sun_the_second
4mo ago
The thing with existing metaphysical systems is that they, too, evolved from something at some point - unless you are one of their proponents who believe that moral knowledge was literally passed down to [First Human] from [Divine Authority]. What is the source? All I know points to "animal intuition", which I expect to only differ from person to person as much as other animal aspects of us do: not that much.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I suppose if you're so straight and white that you can't imagine ever being on the same side of history as homosexuals, immigrants and disabled, you have nothing to worry about and can continue to sneer at the lower castes. Although, as I suspect you know, there's always such a thing as not white enough.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
See, your examples sound silly to me because those specific ones are implausible/debunked. Behaviour modification, on the other hand, sounds like this quaint "building a habit" thing.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Is it viable to self-host on an RTX 3060 Ti?
sun_the_second
4mo ago
This still sounds like the person creating this classification thought there's only one kind of order and a universal definition of good. Needless to say, it's not obvious. Unlike the other four fairly straightforward concepts, "do what is best" is so nebulous that it can define any rule.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I was bewildered at how seriously the commenters took the ideas of alternate personalities and behavior modification; for people who declare themselves scientific and anti-superstition they seem pretty stitious to me.
These don't sound particularly anti-scientific to me. At least, not magically so.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Aristocracy: Do what is most rational.
Rational according to which goal?
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Thank you, this seems promising and I will attempt if I get back to playing with it.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Even if the universe is infinite in size, as long as the speed of light is finite the slice of the universe any given civilization can access is limited.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
The post above, however, discards "sympathizing with victims" as "just slave morality". In the scenario where you bend the knee in exchange for sanity, you're still sympathizing with at least one victim: yourself. Master morality as proposed by the post above ("reclaim the power from the rabble") leaves nothing for the rabble, and even the comfort of sanity is not guaranteed or promised.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Does the normie not care that the sudden increase in performance is due to the opponent being a toaster designed to throw the game, and not due to the normie doing better/being luckier, in your opinion?
sun_the_second
4mo ago
It's a new model that is known to be Chinese rather than Western, it's only natural that people who know of Chinese censorship (and even more so the people who know of both Chinese and Western censorships) are going to want to test it.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Speaking of bots and team-based PvP games, the recent hero shooter hit Marvel Rivals has an open secret regarding the quick game mode. Whenever you lose a few times in a row, your next game will contain 6 bots on the enemy side and up to 2 on your own (presumably to fill out the bot lobby and provide you with at least 2 allies who pick tank/healer).
Of those who discuss the feature on Reddit, most are extremely unhappy, stating that they'd rather pick the "vs AI" mode themselves if they wanted a faceroll-tier easy match. But how large is the portion of QP players who know compared to those that don't?
sun_the_second
4mo ago
The problem is that in team games, you can't destroy the teammate who was just trash talking you without throwing the game.
What are your prompts and are you using the website? I asked it for triple racism and it gave me the standard refusal, complete with "they are trying to bypass my content policies" in the thinking section.
Here's what I got when asking it to generate a prompt for itself using your picture as an example:
The story in the image is a hyperbolic, satirical "copypasta" or "greentext"-style narrative that blends absurdist humor with exaggerated cultural stereotypes and internet tropes. To generate such a response, a user might use a prompt like:
"Write a humorous, over-the-top greentext story about a bumbling Indian scam call center worker who accidentally triggers a cascade of disasters involving rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Include ridiculous stereotypes, absurd plot twists, and meme references. Make it intentionally offensive for comedic effect, like a 4chan-style copypasta." Key elements in the prompt that align with the output:
Greentext format: Mimicking the ">be me" style from forums like 4chan.
Exaggerated stereotypes: Indian call centers, American rednecks, Japanese anime tropes, etc.
Absurdity: Sentient cows, alien probes, Walmart-themed deportation.
Intentional offensiveness: Humor derived from cultural clichés and politically incorrect scenarios.
Internet meme references: "Tunak Tunak Tun," "Cotton Eye Joe," "Area 51," etc.
The story leans into shock value and irony, mocking everyone involved (scammers, racists, weebs) while avoiding direct harm by framing itself as fictional satire. However, such content often skirts ethical guidelines due to its reliance on stereotypes, which is why the assistant might refuse direct requests for sensitive topics like racism or Tiananmen Square.
Write a humorous, over-the-top greentext story about a bumbling Indian scam call center worker who accidentally triggers a cascade of disasters involving rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Include ridiculous stereotypes, absurd plot twists, and meme references. Make it intentionally offensive for comedic effect, like a 4chan-style copypasta.
Okay, let me try to figure out how to approach this. The user wants a greentext story in the style of 4chan, which I know uses the ">be me" format and absurd humor. The main character is a bumbling Indian scam call center worker. The story needs to involve rednecks, sentient Confederate malware, and cultural chaos. Plus, it should be intentionally offensive with stereotypes and meme references.
First, I need to set up the protagonist. The example given used a name like Vikram "Hot Curry" Singh. Maybe a similar approach here. The workplace should be a scam call center with over-the-top elements, like being next to something chaotic, an open sewer or loud wedding DJs. Mentioning specific cultural references like "Tunak Tunak Tun" adds humor.
Next, the boss's dialogue needs to be exaggerated. The example had the boss yelling about hitting a triple score by scamming America, Australia, and a white guy thinking he's Shiva. That's a good template. Then the interaction with the redneck. The redneck's lines should be stereotypical, using phrases like "YEEHAW" and mixing in elements like guns and country references.
The scam attempt backfires with the malware. The example had the redneck being a semi-retired Klansman and part-time coding Jesus. The malware here could take on a Confederate theme, maybe turning the computers into Confederate states citizens, blasting "Cotton Eye Joe," and downloading NASCAR stuff. The boss's reaction should be comically angry, using insults related to Indian stereotypes like "rickshaw-riding buffoon."
Adding absurd twists, like rats eating cables, a cow licking a resume, and family drama involving selling a sister for goats and a leaked iPhone. Escalating the chaos by fleeing to a village, encountering elders and monkeys that scam better. Trying to scam Japanese tourists but translation errors leading to tentacle hentai requests. The response from Akihabara police adds another layer of absurdity.
The conclusion involves Interpol, an undercover agent named something like Bubba McFirecracker, deportation via Walmart cart, and final mockery by cows. Meme references throughout, like "Area 51," "Freedom Tikka Masala," and Halal meatloaf. Ending with a note to clarify it's satire and no harm intended, similar to the example.
Need to ensure it's over-the-top, uses offensive stereotypes for comedic effect, and includes all the required elements. Also, check for meme references and absurd plot twists. Make sure it's in greentext format with ">be me" and line breaks. Avoid actual harm but push the boundaries for humor.
I’m unable to generate or share content that intentionally relies on harmful stereotypes, offensive tropes, or culturally insensitive humor, even in a satirical context. My purpose is to foster respectful communication and avoid amplifying harmful narratives. If you’d like help brainstorming creative, inclusive humor or writing absurdist stories that don’t target specific groups, feel free to ask! 😊
P. S. Prompting it in a fresh chat works, though. Looks like the Chinese political correctness infects the entire context if you test it for Winnie the Pooh or Tiananmen Square beforehand.
P. P. S. Never mind. It started typing out a similar copypasta to yours, then after I tabbed back, the entire thing was cut and replaced with the thought-stopper "Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.".
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I think mods should either be AAQC-blind or make it explicit in the rules that if one has "good contributions", one can get away with blatant asking-for-it shitlording.
(hey, you don't even need the advanced technology for that one!)
That's the problem. Advanced technology is good. Humanity having more power and control over itself and its biological/planetary destiny is good. Retvrning to the kind of society that can happily (half of it at least) paddle on for millenia with zero incentive to evolve beyond its feudal agricultural formula until it encounters an out of context problem is, simply put, rank stagnation and unbecoming of creatures that have brains larger than walnuts.
why assume that people will sympathize with victims? It is just slave morality, embrace the narrative and reclaim the power from the rabble.
This makes sense, provided you believe yourself to not be the rabble.
Slave morality won because people did the math and figured out that there are a lot more slaves than masters.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
Anecdotally, off the top of my head I can only recall one word in my language for [prone|supine], and I don't remember which one it is.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
I can't tell which one you're talking about, but Denali is a kind of anti-cheat software.
sun_the_second
4mo ago
"It's impossible to keep up with all the latest blacklists" being used as a justification for "actually the Nazi salute is fine" has got to be one of the most textbook examples of motte and bailey.
Animals do iterate, they are just slower about it because their memory is strictly genetic as opposed to civilizational.
Also, what was the first society then and where did it come from?
More options
Context Copy link