Is Massachusetts gerrymandered? If the distribution of Rs is even enough, it's basically impossible to create a reasonably contiguous district with enough Rs. A cursory look at the map doesn't reveal any obvious ways to carve out an R district, and it seems that few state republicans complained about the last redistricting..
https://www.wbur.org/news/2025/09/02/massachusetts-trump-gerrymander-texas-california-democrats
Ultimately we should just get rid of single member districts.
I refuse to believe Gaza was a serious issue. There were not enough Dearborns to impact the election. Not that the Israel issue isn't seriously divisive (perhaps within both parties, soon) but "it's the economy stupid" is usually a good explanation for things.
The founders believed states would have much more power and guard it jealously. The Gettysburg address was the tipping point between "The United States are..." and "The United States is". Then the depression and the war ensured federal dominance.
Well, it's more likely to work than charging Comey with writing "8647" in seashells, but there's really not much to say about this.
The New Orleans shooter managed to cook up some homemade RDX, though he forgot that it requires a detonator. Bizarre display of semicompetence from an Army vet.
This guy was a caltech grad and he couldn't come up with a better plan than "run past a security checkpoint and hope there aren't more guards"? He didn't even get onto the floor of the ballroom itself. What happened to good old fashioned ANFO?
Where does this end?
In the short term, robo-caretakers for the ballooning aging population. In the medium to long term, artificial wombs for mass production of wards of the state. Sexbots will help top off the bread and circuses. AGI will pay for all of this of course.
Or, continued mass migration from the wellsprings of fertility. One seems more realistic than the other.
Hostile powers with nukes aimed at each other certainly pushes the world closer to nuclear use. One Soviet submarine officer prevented the Cuban missile crisis from going nuclear; another successfully nothing ever happens'd a false early warning. India and Pakistan is the most likely flashpoint for nuclear war; they are neighbors, have actually fired missiles at each other, and India even managed to accidentally fire a nuclear capable missile into Pakistan a few years ago. All it takes is one stupid misunderstanding and an overzealous trigger man. Iran and Israel have the mitigating factor of distance, but Iran's paucity of early warning systems will increase paranoia.
There's a thin line between informants and agitators.
Oh, I was just adding on to your point about the study. The healthcare system would implode if we tried to impose Medicare or Medicaid prices on providers.
-A comment from a presumably intelligent healthcare professor on a recent healthcare podcast
Redistricting is retarded. Look at Louisiana. First the legislature draws up a map with 5 non-black majorities and 1 black majority. This is challenged in court and found to violate the VRA so they go back and draw up a new map with 2 black majority districts (Louisiana is 1/3 black). Another group of 'non-African-American voters' challenges the new map for being racially gerrymandered and a federal panel agrees, so now they might have to change the map again pending SCOTUS decision.
Redistricting changes that would significantly shift the results (based on the most recent election) should just not be allowed. Why can every other country make this work?
Yes, and people conflating this with historical antisemitism are pretty clearly off the mark. You can't explain it with reference to, idk, shylock or the dreyfus affair (do 5% of Americans know who alfred dreyfus was?)
To the antiracist left/liberal, Jews are white colonialists and Arabs are brown natives. There is very little that the oppressed can do against their oppressors that deserves full-throated condemnation.
Vance apparently asked for a 20 year halt on enrichment (and handing over the remaining uranium). Now they're thinking about releasing $20b of frozen assets in exchange. It's hard to see how this isn't just the JCPOA but worse in most aspects.
Per NYT, Israel told the US that they had intel about a meeting between Khameini and other IRGC leaders in a few days time and pitched it as the best time to strike. If the US had declined to get involved, Israel probably would not have gone ahead.
The funny thing is that the economy was generally doing well pre-war. Dow was over 50k as someone pointed out, employment was good. Tariffs were paid for by Americans but weren't as big a drag as expected either, although core goods inflation would have been negative without them? He really could have done nothing, toned down ICE's retardation, and coasted.
South Korea is perfectly capable of annihilating Pyongyang even without nukes. The threat simply isn't credible. America could not have threatened the Soviets and Chinese with nukes to get them out of Vietnam, and Nixon's madman theory made him look pathetic instead.
It was also sitting under the rubble of Isfahan since last June; no indication that they were even trying to dig it out. Because it was a bargaining chip (until now).
Nuclear blackmail also doesn't work the way the author thinks it does. Why doesn't North Korea say "Give us $100b and lift all sanctions or we nuke South Korea and Japan"?
For better or for worse, human happiness seems to be tied only lightly to absolute material standards and heavily tied to relative status, position, and feelings of fairness, and the internet and social media are super-stimuli for the human sense of status calibrated towards the Dunbar number.
Relative deprivation/hedonic treadmill.
Agreed, this is just impotent rage finding a lightning rod. You can't change society, but you can (attempt to) murder a CEO.
They agreed to 3.67% enrichment and then the US ripped it up; thus, ask for more next time. If you look at a graph of SWUs (ie effort/time input) versus enrichment percentage, it's not that huge a leap; the first few percentage points of enrichment are the hardest.
Wasn't that the point of the JCPOA? You can point out it was not indefinite, but given millennarian Shia expectations, it could plausibly be renewed without too much ideological handwringing.
Which shows that they value having proxies over having nuclear weapons. Ultimately, trying to get nukes has been more trouble than it's worth for the Iranians; Israel can't invade them, the US pre-Trump wasn't interested, and it just led to a whole bunch of crippling sanctions. Khameini issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons which, presumably, meant something in a very fundamentalist society.
- Prev
- Next

5th circuit court halts abortion pill access by mail
For various legal reasons, although SCOTUS ruled against universal injunctions in Trump v Casa, now no one gets to mail pills anywhere until the FDA completes its safety review, even though Louisiana is the one complaining that women keep managing to get abortions anyways. This is lame and we should just have the opposing states fight (in court). Blue states have already enacted "shield laws" and red states have countered with "We can sue you anyways" laws.
More options
Context Copy link