Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
- 23
 - 2
 
What is this place?
			This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a 
			court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to 
			optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
			The weekly Culture War threads host the most 
			controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are 
			appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; 
			if in doubt, post!
			
			Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. 
			You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
		
Why are you called The Motte?
			A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, 
			it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
			originally identified by 
			philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial 
			but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens 
			this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for 
			the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired 
			propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
			On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
			
		
New post guidelines
			If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
			A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
			such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
			submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
			Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
			significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
			If in doubt, please post it!
		
Rules
- Courtesy
 - Content
 - Engagement
				
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
 - Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
 - Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
 - Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
 - Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
 
 - The Wildcard Rule
 - The Metarule
 
		
	

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
In Australian news, 9 years jail-time (5.5 non-parole) for a guy who posted pictures of women superimposed onto pornography.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/man-jailed-for-sharing-fake-images-of-women-he-knew-on-porn-site/ca1myxahk
Pleading guilty is supposed to get you 25% off in our system. He'll almost certainly appeal and get the sentence greatly reduced, which the judge should really have been aware of in theory-of-mind terms. She's known to be a harsh sentencer. For context, the maximum penalty for trafficking commercial quantities of drugs is 10 years (large commercial quantities is higher). Grievous bodily harm? Max 10 years.
At the same time we have an ongoing debate about restructuring rape/sexual assault trials to ensure the victim can't be cross-examined so intensely. Presumably as women get more and more influence in the legal system this trend of favouring female interests will continue.
Interesting that the word "slut" is now considered sufficiently offensive to censor in state media.
They're generally pretty accurate though, it's mostly in story selection and presentation that their slant appears.
I'm Australian myself; that's how I knew SBS was state media. I'm merely noting that "slut" wouldn't have been censored 20 or even probably 10 years ago.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link