site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 10, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

people who, for instance, will give a baby soda in their bottle

Do people actually do this? Why would anyone ever do this?

I give my kid fruit juice and it's not much better for ya.

Maybe stop doing that?

Nah, it tastes good and I do it sparingly or water it down. Life's too short even if you're two.

That seems fine then, as long as it's freshly-squeezed natural juice and not industrially-produced junk.

I'm told my grandmother gave me Dr. Pepper in a bottle long after I was otherwise done with bottles. This was blamed for the wretched state of my teeth when I started Kindergarten, though I've personally believed that the part where nobody told me that rensing your mouth with Dr. Pepper immediately after brushing your teeth is a bad idea had something to do with it.

(I feel obligated to defend myself by pointing out that I quit sodas when I was 13 and haven't looked back since. It's just that, when I was 5, I started school with no upper incisors and silver canines making me look like a sleepy robot vampire.)

I was skeptical myself. This survey looked at three different locations in Australia, Singapore and Vietnam and asked parents to report whether different high calorie beverages (HCBs) had been introduced to their child:

HCBs, such as cordial, flavoured milk, 100% fruit juice, fruit drink, and non-caffeinated soft drinks ... were introduced at an early age in all localities, but more frequently in Vietnam. 36.9% of respondents in HCMC [Ho Chih Minh City, Vietnam] reported giving HCBs to children at six months or less, compared with 13.0% in Campbelltown [Australia] and 12.1% in Singapore. At one year, 72.6% of participants in HCMC had introduced HCBs, compared to 32.4% in Campbelltown and 36.3% in Singapore.

The most common high calorie beverage seems to be fruit juice. In Campbelltown and Singapore, soft drinks appear to be fairly uncommon before age 1 -- maybe around 5 percent in Singapore and well under that in Campbelltown.

I can't be sure what the numbers would be like in the USA, and they would probably vary by region.

Also, note that the numbers before 6 months are even smaller, and that 1 year olds are often not bottle fed any more, for what it's worth.

Edit: Actually, reading further, it appears that none of the parents in Singapore or Campbelltown gave their children soft drinks of any kind by 6 months:

Non-caffeinated soft-drinks (Fig. 8) were introduced by 2.4% of participants in HCMC by six months, but none were introduced in Campbelltown and Singapore. At one year, the rate rose to 11.9% of participants in HCMC, compared to 1.9% in Campbelltown and 5.5% in Singapore.

...

Caffeinated soft-drinks (Fig. 9) were introduced by six months by 3.6% of participants in HCMC, but by none in Campbelltown and Singapore. By one year, 9.5% of participants in HCMC had introduced caffeinated soft drinks, compared to 0.9% in Campbelltown, and 1.1% in Singapore.

This reinforces my skepticism about soft drink bottle feeding, I have to say.

Yes, people do this. Underclass women without good role models make absolutely horrendous childbearing decisions and that’s one of them.

I had an accident one winter and damaged a part on my car just before spring break. So I took greyhound that trip. I learned many things about people, and I'm pretty sure Greyhound should change their motto to, It's not just a ride, it's an adventure.

One of the many memorable people was a young lady with a roughly 6mo old baby. Who she said cried if her baby didn't get a bottle of cola about once an hour (I kept my guess about caffeine withdrawal as the cause to my self).

(I kept my guess about caffeine withdrawal as the cause to my self).

Are not babies crying every hour the default? Regardless of caffeine withdrawal or not. Babies cry if they are hungry, sleepy, in an uncomfortable position, need their diapers changed, etc.

My guess (yet to have a baby) is that the baby was crying because hungry, and the mother in question discovered that soda works in replacement of milk.

It's abnormal for a six month old to need to eat that often, six month olds eat about 4-5 times a day (with 3-4 hours between feeds) and nap 3ish times a day.

Usually a watchful parent can tell if a baby needs something (food, sleep, etc) before it reaches the point of crying. If a baby cries, a parent should be able to resolve the issue without soda. A six month old is past the point of colic.

That's a pretty short time for a child older than a few months to be getting hungry or sleepy in my admittedly limited experience. Yeah, babies seem to love all things sweet, so I'm sure soda was pretty easy to get him to drink.