site banner
xanados  1yr ago (reddit.com)   2752 thread views

Reddit bans AI art model user for too many parentheses

reddit.com

So it turns out that the triple-parenthesis thing can get you banned from reddit even for benign nonsense. Some context: in some open source AI image models, you can use parentheses to emphasize terms that you want the model to pay more attention to. In this case, the author wrote "(((detailed face)))" and some other terms in their image prompt.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic

I mean, in online moderation I might not insist on literal Blackstone's ratio (though perma-site-bans from a major social media site start to have some of the same connotations - ban from a subreddit is a community deciding to expel you, ban from Reddit is a rule that no subreddit community is allowed to admit you), but do you have any statistics on how many of the people banned for ((())) are Nazis vs. talking about Nazis vs. syntax?

No idea. But that seems the most obvious reason, and sounds like plausible reason (which does not make it a good reason).

If it was human reviewed: maybe also they have see whatever image was produced and "bad anatomy, child, young" (without spotting that it is in negative prompt).

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats