site banner
PaperclipPerfector  4mo ago (text post)   2933 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for January 5, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To the American users of this sub, does anyone use a HealthShare plan?

Here's an example: https://altruahealthshare.org/how-it-works/memberships/

This would, in theory, allow one to have access to health care at less than half of the cost of comparable Obamacare plans. Presumably, a large part of the difference is not getting grouped together with the drug addicts, mentally ill, and extremely fat that make up a sizeable percentage of the American public.

But what are the practical elements of the plan? When I go to the doctor, are they going to give me a hard time?

I do not use a healthshare plan, but it remains a possibility for the future. I have many friends who do.

  • Doctors do not hassle about the use of the plan, but you do have to pay for many things which would be covered by an insurance plan. This would include checkups, vaccines, etc. It does not cover birth control and this is explained to me as intentional. These plans are most popular among very conservative Christians who object to paying for prep on moral as well as financial reasons, as well as a few hippies, and this demographic oddity is reflected by the leadership.
  • You will get a bill after care and have to submit it to healthshare for reimbursement/payment yourself. I'm not sure whether they give you the money and you pay the bill, or they pay the bill for you. They definitely expect you to negotiate the bill down and price shop but I don't know how much enforcement there is. Either way, this is significantly more navigating paperwork than a conventional insurance plan.
  • Not covering the obese, drug addicts, alcoholics and heavy smokers, homosexuals, etc is probably a large part of the cost saving, but members in these plans tend to really believe in the mission and I believe that they save money by price shopping a lot as well, or by expecting members to pay for certain things themselves. Prescription coverage in particular is very bad and you should see this as similar to a high deductible plan, but with no network requirements.
  • A lot of the people using these plans have hippy-ish attitudes and the doctors most used to these are the ones that are willing to see antivaxxers, or who have unusual views on nutrition, or whatever.

For context for those not in the know, prep is a drug that allows for participation in gay orgies without contracting HIV. Your US insurance is legally required to provide it at no cost (thanks Congress). It is not especially cheap to your insurer, and those costs are covered by elevated prices for users in general.

Mentioned this a few weeks ago, iirc it's $20,000 a year. Something like 10x my entire lifetime of medical expenses, but I end up paying for it anyway.

@self_made_human’s source suggests that it’s dropped to $40/month, better than most of these Medicare prescriptions. Probably fewer users, too.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats