site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 27, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

government bureaucrats. They literally can't describe what they do at all

all they really do is ritualistically go through meetings where check boxes get ticked by the performative act of repeating managerial chants and "delegating" anything that requires knowledge, expertise, action, or even the assumption of responsibility down a memory hole where presumably it becomes somebody else's problem on the other side

Just to be clear, you are excoriating only the managers who do (or claim to do) nothing but coordination, and not the engineers, scientists, planners, etc. who do the actual work? Because some would include those engineers/scientists/planners in the "bureaucrat" category as well.

Doesn't the federal government contract out almost all of that actual wrench-turning work? E.g., NASA doesn't build rockets (Boeing/ULA/SpaceX), satellites (Lockmart, Northrup) or probes (JPL, Northrup). But they do a shit-ton of paperwork.

I can offer some insight into that. That's the perception but the reality is more complicated and it depends.

A little over half of NASA's government workforce of ~18,000 are engineers of some kind according to data from OPM's FedScope. While you're correct that most (not all) hands on hardware are from contractors, NASA-proper is heavily involved in the design and engineering.

Man, I've got stories to tell about my experience with "NASA Engineers", but I'm afraid they'd be too specific and out myself in my relatively small industry.

Let's just say this. Every now and again when I'm shooting the shit and people are talking about their work, I start griping about the NASA people I have to work with. And normies undoubtedly go "Oh wow, NASA?!" And I have to remind them, this isn't the NASA that put a man on the moon. This is the NASA that wasted a billion dollars because they didn't convert feet to meters correctly.

Jesus... even just this last week....

But like I said, I can't risk outing myself.

Presumably. But all the contracts I've worked on with three letter agencies have had probably a 5:1 ratio of managers to productive people. It's truly incredible. I'll be in an explicitly technical meeting, with explicitly planned technical goals (test connectivity, simulate some activity across systems, etc), and there will be literally 10 project managers hobnobbing for the entirety of the planned time, and myself and one other sad overworked engineer on the other side. Eventually the meeting reaches it's planned end time, all the project managers excuse themselves to attend other meetings, and myself and my technical counterpart finally get to do the work the meeting was planned around in the first place, an hour or two after the start of the meeting, eating into time we were supposed to be doing other shit.

But these fucking asshole project managers just invite themselves from meeting to meeting, destroying productivity, and treating it like a social function. It's been like this for the last 5-8 years I've been on contracts with federal government agencies. At least when this first started, if I had technical questions 8 of the project managers would look around scared and one grizzled old white guy project manager who'd been cowed into silence would finally speak up and show that not everyone there was a sinecure. That hasn't happened in the last 4 years. You just get shouted down by the PMs for asking technical questions in an explicitly technical meeting. They're utterly shameless now.

one grizzled old white guy project manager

He retired last year at our company. We only have the other sort now. The outcomes are shit but we still get challenge coins for the great 'success' of projects.

fucking asshole project managers just invite themselves from meeting to meeting, destroying productivity

They have to account for their time to tenths of hours against relevant charge codes, that's near 90% of their job.

So much of current year feels like managed decline.