Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 125
- 3
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Book subthread
(I hope nobody minds but until there's a script that automatically posts a book subthread I'm just gonna go and do it on every future friday thread)
Very short review of the Eisenhorn trilogy by Dan Abnett
Wanted some innocuous bedtime reading and was playing a WH40K game, so I decided to check out the related literature.
I'm aware that much of WH40K literature is a bit basic, so I checked somewhere - either the 40KLore reddit or I asked Deepseek about the 'best written' stuff and was told it's the Eisenhorn trilogy* by Dan Abnett so I started reading them in order.
They're sort of mystery/ procedurals following the career of the titular Inquisitor Eisenhorn- probably a decent introduction to WH40k to people unaware of the setting. It's nothing great, I'd say it's like.. 1 level above Clancy in writing quality, maybe a level under Iain M. Banks. Not regretting reading them at all, it's quite readable and fairly well written.
A pleasant ending is simply not a possibility, neither is retirement unless it's of the medical sort. The books sort of attempt to describe it but it doesn't succeed nearly as well as it should.
The mystery part isn't aided by it being a part of an established canon, though. Something like 'Declare' by Powers is a somewhat better book - I strongly recommend it, but partly because it's a genuine mystery and novelty - something not entirely possible in something like WH40 where t he supernatural is the same sort of problem as say, the mob or rats. Severe, serious and persistent problems but not actually mysterious much.
The best Warhammer books are Ciaphas Cain. Now Sandy Mitchell is just marginally better author than brandon sanderson*, but his books have no right being this much pulpy fun.
*For anyone doubting Brandon Sanderson is harder to read than Joyce I present you the part of Rhythm of War that is between the front and the back cover.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link