Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Apropos of a very small, tangential discussion on the main culture war thread, what are the borders of polyamory?
For me personally, I don’t think of any variation of one man/x number of women as actually being polyamorous in the current year sense. It’s all just gradations between patriarch with +1 wife, or a mistresses situation, or a full on Ottoman seraglio.
I can’t say I base this on much more than vibes, but modern polyamory seems to connote at least one additional male in the mix, and probably something that tends towards more even mixes of men and women.
One Penis Policies are the most common format of polyamory seen in the real world. It might not be the most pure form of poly or the most honored form of poly in theory but it's the most common, so it seems like it would be odd to define it out of the community.
It also seems odd to call such a scenario monogamy, which would be the implication if one defined it out of polyamory.
In my mind polyamory is defined by:
-- Some degree of social and public openness about the nature of one's relationships.
-- Open Acceptance of the arrangement by all partners involved, with at least some degree of lip service to the idea that this is a positive arrangement for all involved.
So cheating isn't polyamory on either count, but a two ladies, and I'm the only man does, polygyny being a subcategory.
This is so fascinating!
I would not call a one penis policy monogamy. But it’s also not polyamory, at least not as I understand the essence of the concept. It’s just regular old polygamy on the euphemism treadmill.
That’s why it’s so interesting that you have reason to believe it’s the most common format. On the rare occasions I run into openly polyamorous relationships, they are almost always one woman/two or more men. It’s hard to phrase the apparent dynamics charitably because they have been pretty clearly moderately attractive woman+beta wallet cuck+jobless alpha chad. If it’s not that kind of relationship, then it’s sloppy low-class, low-status trailer park relationships being dressed up as a “polycule.”
Inasmuch as I think of those latter two types as being something distinct enough from polygamy to have their own technical term, I think one penis policies are just something very old coming out, inevitably, but having to dress itself in modern clothing, as it were, even if the clothes don’t fit well or at all.
I guess we're at crossed wires here on the definition of and the distinction between Polygamy and Polyamory. Polygamy refers to having more than one spouse, while Polyamory refers to having more than one lover. Polygamy refers only to situations in which one is, at minimum, establishing a mutual household if not claiming marriage; while Polyamory refers to any kind of relationship structure in which one party approves of the other party having an additional lover. I'm not sure what your working definition is; as far as I can tell (meant without insult) it's something like "Annoying thing that Annoying cucks on the internet won't stop Annoying me about." Which might be a good definition for most of the times you've run into it online!
Where I've run into IRL couples who label themselves Poly, the most common types in order of appearance are:
-- Theoretically "open" relationships with a 1PP where the woman is supposedly Bisexual and free to sleep with other women but never really has the get up and go to find a woman; and the man is free to sleep with other women in the case of a threesome but isn't hot enough to find one easily while his wife is kind of half-assing it; and it never happens and they're always nosing around "poly" and "kink" and "Queer" events trying to find a third. These are the ones everyone else complains about because they're annoying.
-- The above, but the couple is hot and/or rich and the woman is genuinely bisexual, and therefore find thirds regularly, who they include as an auxiliary member in their relationship for a period of time before shuffling them out. In this case, a 1PP is the stable equilibrium, because a hot woman can find other women about as easily as a hot man can find other women.
-- True "Open" relationships in which both partners are free to pursue other lovers as they choose and are doing so. They tend to just be a glide path to breaking up, or very loosely attached to begin with. Tend to break down due to gender imbalances, because a woman of any given quality can find a man much more easily than a man of a similar quality can find a woman.
-- Polyandry in which one woman and multiple male partners play house. Normally a degenerate form of the above, in which the men are theoretically empowered to look elsewhere but don't.
In all cases, the defining aspect of a polyamorous relationship is the acceptance on the part of one's partner that one is allowed to have additional lovers.
Before I respond in any kind of more substantive way, I will throw out there that I don’t think we’re really at crossed wires.
Polygamy is illegal in the United States. My take is that relationships that would be polygamous under a different legal regime just retitle themselves as polyamorous and go without the official legal imprimatur of marriage despite being long-term mutual households, and being essentially patriarchal “one dude, multiple women” setups. That’s what I mean about them being polygamy on the euphemism treadmill. It’s just patriarchal (which is good, IMO!) dynamics accruing to themselves some woke cover. It’s all very fascinating to me, honestly.
To me, harem-type setups have something distinctly different about them, in essence, compared to the types you mention above.
I suppose that is possible, but I haven't really encountered it. Generally where you have the rich man keeping a harem on hand, they make no bones about not liking each other and being unhappy about the arrangement, even if Mahomet said it was ok, accepting it as their lot only for lack of a better option. Polyamory is defined by the multiple women having positive, if not necessarily Sapphic, feelings for one another.
What polyamory has largely replaced is old fashioned adultery.
...It's still adultery, though, in the completely literal sense of 'having sex with people other than your spouse'. Plenty of historical wives understood that their husbands would have mistresses, too(after all, it beats having a husband who's poor).
I think the good old fashioned affair has gone into decline.
When my dad and I drive down a certain highway about 50 minutes south of me, he always points out a house and says "That's where used to put up his mistress and their secret kids."
You don't see that much these days at the small town Pennsylvania level.
Secrets of that magnitude are somewhat more difficult to keep these days.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link