Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 51
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
War subthread.
The entire interview-in English- of the German volunteer Freimann about Ukraine, conducted by a military historian & Col. Reisner of the Bundesheer- the Austrian Armed Forces, he leads their officer training school. Note it's 6 months old by now. Not sure why - first posted on Patreon? Excerpts have been posted earlier.
Reisner is notable for being one of the few Western analysts who was, while acting in an official capacity providing relatively unbiased information - probably because Austria is a neutral state. He is not pro-Russian - you quickly get the impression he doesn't like them, but unlike basically everyone and probably due to the neutral status he felt he was allowed to not be overtly partisan and not distort information.
If someone wants some more interesting war interviews, there's the 3:30 hour accidental Azov battalion Florida volunteer video from '23..
A British volunteer interviewed by Lindybeige. Fairly thorough.
Not gonna watch videos until I’m back at home, but thanks for the links.
How are you assessing Reisner’s reliability? If he were distorting numbers—or selectively reporting, or remaining conspicuously silent—how would you know? It’s easy to spot the most shameless partisans, but that leaves out a lot. I suppose I’m assuming that anyone who spends this much time covering a subject will develop something resembling an opinion.
He doesn't like Russians much you can tell, but I think he's simply one of the few professionals and is mostly fair in his reporting and analysis. What he says isn't too dissimilar, rhetoric/attitude to Ukraine aside from what I hear from certain anti-Ukraine/US westerners with military experience who take their time following the war.
These are people who deplore the senseless waste of life but have little to no sympathies to Russian state.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link