This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I learned this around various DEI claims. Every single one I investigated more deeply fell apart (interruptions, benefits of diversity, women on the board, insignificant differences in interests, implicit bias test, growth mindset, pay gap, names on resumes) and sadly just about anything in relation to historical women in tech (Lovelace first algorithm, Hopper creating Cobol, women 'used to be the majority of computer scientists' ("programmers" in a historical, different sense, yes), Margaret Hamilton wrote all this code, etc. Most of the women involved were plenty awesome without inflating their claims to fame!)
It's sadly at the point that my first instinct is to disbelieve pretty much any psych or sociology 'study', especially if it points in a way the current narrative wants.
Can you elaborate on "interruptions"? I know about most of the things you mentioned but I don't know about that one.
There are claims that men interrupt women more than vice versa. The only 'study' I know was a self-reported single write-up, and the person didn't control for power, e.g. that it's likely the boss interrupts the intern more than vice versa. Even though, in the study, the person who interrupted most was a female vice president.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Let's not forget Hedy Lamarr supposedly inventing Wi-Fi. (I mean the actual, also incorrect factoid is that she came up with the idea of frequency-hopping signals (with more advanced techniques of the same general category being used in modern telecommunications), but the legend has mutated so much through the telephone game that I've heard the unknowing credit her with Wi-Fi itself (which was officially introduced three years before her death, well into her known late life seclusion and when she was a woman in her 80s who I doubt was tinkering much with computers) many times.)
Are you making a point or just dropping a link? Don't do this.
More options
Context Copy link
?
More options
Context Copy link
What's the truth behind the frequency hopping?
The truth:
Frequency-hopping was an old idea by the 1940s stretching back even into the late 1890s, described by Tesla (including in regards to torpedo guidance) at a minimum among others, with a patent from 1929 (over 10 years before Hedy's) even containing the idea (and proposed for essentially the exact same reason of protecting the secrecy/security of wireless communications).
The idea might have been independently reconceived of (of course that's what everyone claims, but the idea is actually a simple enough concept fundamentally (making it even more ridiculous to declare it some grand achievement) that it might be true) in regards to applying it to enhancing the stealth of radio-based torpedo guidance communications during WW2 (which ended up being mostly irrelevant as the whole idea of radio-based torpedo guidance at all was fairly primordial at the time and thus whatever technology developed wasn't likely to be compatible with what might be adopted in the future, that is it was a solution for a mostly hypothetical problem) during a conversation between Hedy and George Antheil, with many tellings being intentionally vague at best in regards to who actually brought it up first (and obviously the side saying Hedy has a particularly fervent and well-known bias and a record of playing fast and loose with history, to say the least, if it means promoting "representation").
Even in the pro-Hedy telling, Antheil came up with all of the details for the exact mechanism of control (based on a piano, as Antheil was a pianist) beyond the initial suggestion.
Hedy then hired Caltech professor Samuel Mackeown to take Antheil's still idea guy-tier description of the technology and turn it into an actual working prototype (which was found to be far too bulky, even if it weren't otherwise pointless, to be used in any practical military context as it would vastly weigh down the ships and torpedoes too much).
Even at that it's suspected by many that the whole story above is still fake entirely and that Hedy's final patent (or even just the basic idea) was simply "acquired" from her ex-husband and armaments (like torpedoes? Hmmm...) dealer Friedrich Mandl. (Mandl was an ardent fascist... but unfortunately for him an ardent Austrofascist, putting him in a somewhat awkward position in both the Axis and Allied sides of the world post-Anschluss. (He tried to collaborate with the Nazis anyway but Göring didn't like him and he was a Jew so he ended up having much of his property expropriated and running off to Switzerland.) Having Hedy publish the patent instead could have benefited both of them.)
Their exact implementation was not used at all during WW2. Eventually the category of techniques frequency-hopping is in was applied to most telecommunications, but since your router or GPS device is obviously not a radio-controlled torpedo trying to avoid sabotage, the exact motivations are obviously entirely different and the exact details vastly more sophisticated in design and implementation (but closer to the designs of engineers prior and subsequent to Mackeown like Broertjes who imagined frequency hopping being applied to pure communications).
So even in the most pro-Hedy telling (in which she still didn't come up with the exact implementation), at best you can maybe give her credit for not knowing about an idea that had been around for decades prior and possibly thinking of it herself (if she really was the one who brought it up first) and applying it to torpedoes (though she still wasn't the first in that either). Obviously though you tend to not get credit for adding something to the technological canon if you're decades late to the conception of it and thus it's pretty ridiculous to credit Hedy with basically any real novel contribution to modern Wi-Fi, GPS, etc. (My criticism isn't solely sex-based either; I don't give Antheil much credit other than being somewhat more engineered-minded than you average pianist. He didn't come up with the idea either even if he independently thought of it.)
You see similar sorts of chicanery with basically every category of invention that was essentially inevitable based on prior technological developments but took time to popularize/commercialize/standardize (traffic signals, light bulbs, etc.): Find the figure most beneficial to woke ideology who dabbled in it in the early days, give them all the credit, and ignore the rest. It's not like the audience you're seeking is going to challenge you on it, as they've been programmed to believe that such a thing is inherently immoral.
Anyway, sorry for the delay. I was rechecking all of the details (which seem to check out) to make sure I didn't end up as one of those Reddit "Akshually" guys who gets the facts just as wrong as what they're "correcting".
It's commendable you put in so much effort in this reply. Well done.
Thank you. Glad you enjoyed it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link