site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 5, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

106
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not sure if this is better for SQS but - What is the steelman argument against vegetarianism/veganism? I am especially interested in claims that aren't health-based, as I know quite a few very intelligent and well-sourced vegans who have thoroughly convinced me that most health based claims are false.

I'm not a vegetarian myself but I'm reasonably convinced that I should be one, it's more of a moral failing on my part that I eat meat, not a logical stance.

I think the strongest against vegetarianism would be something along the lines of: animals have the right to exist, and meat eating is the most viable way to allow animals to exist in a human society.

I'm pretty sure most meat eaters do not think that vegetarianism is wrong, however. They simply disagree with it as a moral imperative. "There's nothing wrong with eating meat" rather than: "Not eating meat is wrong".

Generally non-nutritional arguments would be; distinguishing animal lives as lesser than human lives, believing that animals are incapable (or less capable) of suffering, or that human enjoyment of meat outweighs how an animal suffers to produce it.

Personally, I justify my meat eating habits with the second argument, and to a lesser degree the third. I think that animals (the ones I eat anyway) are capable of feeling pain, but not anguish. They cannot foresee their death, or fear the void, they can't really predict the future beyond associations with past experiences. While animals will likely feel pain when they are slaughtered, humans do a very good job of minimizing that, so that very small amount of unnecessary pain in (what should be) an otherwise happy life is well below the hedonistic enjoyment humans will gain out of the meat. I am against factory farming because of this. Meat should be a rare treat, ideally one you raise and slaughter yourself, not the everyday protein source we use it as today. Meat raised ethically is much tastier anyway, stress causes inflammation that impacts the flavor, and so does a lack of diversity in feed.